86ed
Well-known member
I'm used to reloading for semi-auto pistols but have my new to me 686 now to load for. I generally tend towards loading COL longer so long as it cycle properly, doesn't engage rifling prematurely, etc. if making a load for a specific gun.
However, wheel guns are be a different beast.
I'm going to be using Starline 357 mag brass and Berry's Preferred 158grn FP Plated @ .358. Intended powder is Titegroup, but have CFE Pistol, Unique and AA# 2. The goal is a target load that's slightly more stout than 38 special pressure to practice getting sight picture after a shot break, but no current intentions of full house 357 loads.
I'm thinking to start with 4.3 grains Titegroup, which is Hodgdon published for Hornady XTP (albeit, these a JHPs) as a .38 spl +P load, in a 38 case. Hodgdon lists max load of 6.1 grains for 357 loads for the same projectile/power, in 357 cases so have plenty of margin (except for double charges of course).
Some questions:
- This Starline brass reminds me of military 9mm. It's ungodly thick. It's a tough push through the resizing die (sizing the new brass so it's the same dimensions when once fired and sized) and seems to get stuck on my powder through expanding die every time. Once + fired range 357 brass of other headstamps doesn't have this issue. I'm barely belling enough to seat the bullet without it falling. It's a tough flare and a tough drive to seat the bullet than I'm used to. However, I pulled the bullets on some samples and didn't see any copper being shaved down to lead. Is Starline known to be this stiff? It's not much better skipping the sizing. I'm thinking the slightly oversized .358 projectiles might not be the best fit for this brass.
- What's the general trend for COL in 357 revolvers for consistent velocity and accuracy? Should the cartridges be loaded long COL to minimize the throat jump (obviously not long enough to bind the cylinder or prevent the round from seating headspacing against the rim), or since the bullet will be swaged slightly by the throat anyway, is it better to seat deeper and get more neck tension for better powder starts? The 158 grn FPs seem to get a decent amount of surface area even when loaded to just ~.004 below cylinder face
- Titegroup is known to be hot burning, is there a non-negligible concern with premature erosion of the forcing cone/top strap enough to warrant NOT using TG in this application?
However, wheel guns are be a different beast.
I'm going to be using Starline 357 mag brass and Berry's Preferred 158grn FP Plated @ .358. Intended powder is Titegroup, but have CFE Pistol, Unique and AA# 2. The goal is a target load that's slightly more stout than 38 special pressure to practice getting sight picture after a shot break, but no current intentions of full house 357 loads.
I'm thinking to start with 4.3 grains Titegroup, which is Hodgdon published for Hornady XTP (albeit, these a JHPs) as a .38 spl +P load, in a 38 case. Hodgdon lists max load of 6.1 grains for 357 loads for the same projectile/power, in 357 cases so have plenty of margin (except for double charges of course).
Some questions:
- This Starline brass reminds me of military 9mm. It's ungodly thick. It's a tough push through the resizing die (sizing the new brass so it's the same dimensions when once fired and sized) and seems to get stuck on my powder through expanding die every time. Once + fired range 357 brass of other headstamps doesn't have this issue. I'm barely belling enough to seat the bullet without it falling. It's a tough flare and a tough drive to seat the bullet than I'm used to. However, I pulled the bullets on some samples and didn't see any copper being shaved down to lead. Is Starline known to be this stiff? It's not much better skipping the sizing. I'm thinking the slightly oversized .358 projectiles might not be the best fit for this brass.
- What's the general trend for COL in 357 revolvers for consistent velocity and accuracy? Should the cartridges be loaded long COL to minimize the throat jump (obviously not long enough to bind the cylinder or prevent the round from seating headspacing against the rim), or since the bullet will be swaged slightly by the throat anyway, is it better to seat deeper and get more neck tension for better powder starts? The 158 grn FPs seem to get a decent amount of surface area even when loaded to just ~.004 below cylinder face
- Titegroup is known to be hot burning, is there a non-negligible concern with premature erosion of the forcing cone/top strap enough to warrant NOT using TG in this application?