G.F.I./Fiocchi Brass

Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
4,550
Reaction score
7,843
Location
Spokantucky
I was running a couple hundred rounds of mixed headstamp,nicely cleaned once shot .44 Magnum brass through the stages today and immediately noticed that whenever I ran across a round that required additional "work" I found it to be G.F.I./Fiocchi brand.
My son asked if I would make some "plinking", range bullets for him and had furnished the mixed stamp brass which I ran through the vibrator last night. I am not fond of using mixed stamp brass unless its for one of my semi-autos that are not target grade and I don't care what happens to it. Just wondering if any of you other reloaders have run across this.
 
Register to hide this ad
I wont load any of the foerign 9mm brass. It seems specs are all over with diff manuf. I get a bunch of rounds thst wont case gage with 147gr bullets, always a foreign case like gfl, cbc, aguila.
 
Fiocchi is my favorite range pickup 223 brass (I’m only shooting it in a contender barrel). Some complain the flash holes aren’t always centered but at least you don’t have to deal with crimped primer pockets.
 
I'm still using an old Rock Crusher single stage press and usually everything runs very smooth, without much lever pressure needed to accomplish the job. I do not reload for others and have made an exception with my son. I have kept to a standard of only using one type of brass whenever possible and never have problems with any of the "commercial" companies. He brought me a bunch of mix headstamped stuff that he has been collecting while shooting his .44 magnum. It was all over the place but quite a bit of Fiocchi/G.F.I. mixed in amongst, Winchester, Federal, PPU, etc. Whenever I ran across a piece that required more than the usual effort on the lever, I checked the headstamp and got to where I could tell if it was G.F.I. nothing else wrassled me the way that stuff did.
I just got done by putting a factory crimp on these bullets and once again, everytime I ran into extra pressure on the lever it turned out to be G.F.I. They actually stick to the point the leading edge of the brass is receiving a bit more polish than the rest where it is getting fully sized at the end stroke. I believe the stuff is thicker than normal brass.
Years ago I learned that Winchester brass was the thinnest which enabled me to get more powder in a Winchester 45/70 case than any other, the only case I could truly get 70 grns of 1-1/2 Old Eynsford Goex in.
I'm going to tell him to give that stuff to someone else and scrap out any that I have left in the bunch he dropped off. Even though brass is softer than steel it still puts an unnecessary stress on the press and is the first brass I have ever run across that didn't run smoothly. I've shot a ton of that Fiocchi .223 stuff at the range but never reloaded it, it was great range ammo for an AR.
 
My thought would be that some companies use a smaller flash hole to reduce chamber against the primer. Then in addition to that you have a large diameter decapping pin (RCBS uses 2 sizes) so you are enlarging that hole's diameter a few 1/1000ths inch.

PPC and BR brass use an even smaller flash hole for that same reason and require an extra small pin.

Ivan
 
I’ve used both GFI and Fiocchi rifle brass (7.62) without any noticeable issues. Can’t say anything about their pistol brass as I don’t bother to sort them out for reloading.
 
I'm still using an old Rock Crusher single stage press and usually everything runs very smooth, without much lever pressure needed to accomplish the job. I do not reload for others and have made an exception with my son. I have kept to a standard of only using one type of brass whenever possible and never have problems with any of the "commercial" companies. He brought me a bunch of mix headstamped stuff that he has been collecting while shooting his .44 magnum. It was all over the place but quite a bit of Fiocchi/G.F.I. mixed in amongst, Winchester, Federal, PPU, etc. Whenever I ran across a piece that required more than the usual effort on the lever, I checked the headstamp and got to where I could tell if it was G.F.I. nothing else wrassled me the way that stuff did.
I just got done by putting a factory crimp on these bullets and once again, everytime I ran into extra pressure on the lever it turned out to be G.F.I. They actually stick to the point the leading edge of the brass is receiving a bit more polish than the rest where it is getting fully sized at the end stroke. I believe the stuff is thicker than normal brass.
Years ago I learned that Winchester brass was the thinnest which enabled me to get more powder in a Winchester 45/70 case than any other, the only case I could truly get 70 grns of 1-1/2 Old Eynsford Goex in.
I'm going to tell him to give that stuff to someone else and scrap out any that I have left in the bunch he dropped off. Even though brass is softer than steel it still puts an unnecessary stress on the press and is the first brass I have ever run across that didn't run smoothly. I've shot a ton of that Fiocchi .223 stuff at the range but never reloaded it, it was great range ammo for an AR.


That is because it is Better brass than most of the other old, worn out stuff you are used to.
 
I have used GFI, (Fiocchi) factory loads and the brass for handloads. Mostly in my 32 Long loads. I don't recall ever having any problems loading or shooting it. The factory loads are very good.
 
I believe that G.F.L. and Fiocchi are one and the same. I cannot speak to their 44 Magnum brass, but I did a quasi-scientific experiment with 9mm brass and found their brass to be a little lighter than most others, but with very decent extreme spreads and standard deviation of weight between sampled casings. I regard GFL as "good", but not as good as excellent brass such as Lapua, WIN, Starline, and a few others. -S2
 
I can't remember what non-USA brand that it was but......

one brand took a LOT MORE pressure on my single stage loader to size, de-prime, the brass, than the other mixed cases.

It might be G.F.L. or Tula.......
since I don't load or save these two any more.
 
Strange that this would come up...with Fiocchi brass in 44 magnum.

Here's what I ran into. Brass stamped "G.F.L" is measuring .011" thick. Brass stamped "GFL" is measuring .010". Nearly any other brand of bras I have measures .010" thick.

The G.F.L brass was giving me some headaches with lead projectiles, it will smash it down .001" more than it measures before seating. It was giving me leading issues in my Super Redhawk.

I've sorted the brass and have been using the G.F.L for .429" FMJ XTp projectiles and it works just fine. I use other brass for lead and they work just fine.

I also have GFL brass in 38 and 223 and they are not that way.
 
I believe that G.F.L. and Fiocchi are one and the same. I cannot speak to their 44 Magnum brass, but I did a quasi-scientific experiment with 9mm brass and found their brass to be a little lighter than most others, but with very decent extreme spreads and standard deviation of weight between sampled casings. I regard GFL as "good", but not as good as excellent brass such as Lapua, WIN, Starline, and a few others. -S2

they are the same. GFL stands for 'Giulio Fiocchi Lecco' according to an online headstamp guide I use.
 
No experience with their 44 Mag brass, but with their 357 Mag brass I find it holds up very well to repeated reloading. I have a box of GFL I have kept segregated to track how well it holds up and it's on it's 14-15th reload without issues and most of the loads have been on the hot side using Accurate #9, H110 and 2400.
 
I reload Fiocchi brass often (.44 Spl and .45ACP mostly) and don’t recall ever having any issues myself.
 
I can't remember what non-USA brand that it was but......

one brand took a LOT MORE pressure on my single stage loader to size, de-prime, the brass, than the other mixed cases.

It might be G.F.L. or Tula.......
since I don't load or save these two any more.

This has been exactly my experience with 44 mag and 45 ACP Fiocci brass. I have a ton of it in 44 mag, and I may need to reinforce my reloading table because of it.
 
I found their 357 brass to have tight primer pockets. After using them several times the problem subsided.
 
Back
Top