joe-836
Member
Does anyone know where Hodgdon CFE PISTOL powder would fall on the relative burn rate chart? It does not appear in Lyman's 50th edition chart.
CFE-P is between Unique & Power Pistol, burn rate wise.
I've generally had very good accuracy/grouping results with it, & I keep some on-hand, but it's not my go-to powder for anything.
While others love it's low/no flash property, it's not my preference.
And like most ball/spherical powders I find it's residue stains the outside of the cases in my full loads.
Give it a try & decide for yourself.
.
Are you sure you're not talking about Alliant BE-86?
That has a flash suppressant and it's burn rate is between Unique and Power pistol.
CFE pistol is slower burning than all of those three and has a copper fouling retardant.
I'm not picking a fight. Just quoting published burn rate data that I have. Maybe yours is right and mine is wrong. However, the chart I have, which I've tried to attach to this post shows CFE Pistol further down the burn rate chart from Unique and Power Pistol. Not all that important to the discussion at hand. I use a lot of CFE Pistol too, and I think it's a very versatile powder.I've never used BE-86. Have used several pounds of CFE-P.
Sorry, you're not correct.
The attached reloading data clearly shows that CFE-P is in-between Unique & Power Pistol's burn rate, definitely not slower.
And as the article below says, or anyone who has used it knows, it has low flash, especially compared to either Unique or Power Pistol.
.
"Hodgdon recently introduced a new gunpowder to pistol shooters known as CFE Pistol.
This is a spherical powder that has a Copper Fouling Eraser (CFE) formula, and follows the 2012 introduction of the rifle version CFE 223.
Hodgdon bills CFE Pistol as a perfect propellant for target and self-defense loads, providing clean burning and low muzzle flash."
A 'Fast' Look at Hodgdon CFE Pistol Powder
.
.
![]()
.
Burn rate charts are notorious for being inconsistent, mainly because there's no standard for establishing it & everybody can use different sized vessels for their tests which makes a difference.
Whether it's in a 9mm, 40 S&W or 45ACP, reloading data shows it's in-between Unique & Power Pistol.
So many obvious misplacements in that chart too.
LongShot & Power Pistol typically have very close load data, yet that chart shows LongShot is slower than Blue Dot. No way.
And how is Silhouette faster than Green Dot??
Professional reloading data gives you a better idea of a powder's burn rate than burn rate charts.
.
"Burning Rate" (actually it should be called relative quickness) data is inconsistent, and depends on the cartridge and bullet weight used. Powder A may be "quicker" than Powder B in .38 Special with a 158 grain lead bullet, but reversed in .45 ACP with a 230 grain FMJ. Those comparison charts are just rough guides to making propellant substitutions.
What if you looked up the data for each powder to achieve the same velocity in a 230 grain 45 ACP load?
Would CFE Pistol still fall between the other two, or would differences in burn rate change the order and make the slowest burning powder need the least amount of powder to achieve a given velocity?