|
|
02-08-2015, 06:10 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 595
Likes: 4,511
Liked 2,074 Times in 336 Posts
|
|
Model 1917 back from the gunsmith
Last September I traded a 4" DAO Model 64-5 for this 1917. It was in pretty rough shape, so I decided it would provide a good opportunity to try the new gunsmith in town. All proof marks had been files off of the gun. There was so much wear that one side of the barrel was flat. The muzzle was no longer square to the bore.
Overall, I'm satisfied with the work. He took a few liberties without consulting me first. I really wish he hadn't. He said that he was going to replace the original stocks. He ended up "reconditioning" them instead. You can see the results below. The lanyard ring was added, which we also didn't discuss. I think it is a nice touch.
Other work done included re-cutting and crowning the muzzle as well as refinishing the gun.
No trigger work was done. The pull is a bit stiff, but very smooth. I can't wait to get it to the range. I also think that it makes a great companion to my Winchester Model of 1917 rifle.
I have to do something about the stocks. I'm considering reproduction stocks and maybe a Tyler T. Suggestions are more than welcome.
Here's the important part
Before:
After:
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-08-2015, 08:15 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Flathead Valley, Montana
Posts: 2,822
Likes: 2,593
Liked 12,781 Times in 1,815 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
|
Repros won't work, notice how the frame has been modified? The shape is closer to a colt then a s&w.
Going to have to probably take up stock making and make your own set for it.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-08-2015, 08:19 PM
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: upstate SC / Mtns SW Va
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 3,064
Liked 9,875 Times in 1,986 Posts
|
|
Ouch on the grips. The rest looks fine
Charlie
|
02-08-2015, 08:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,644
Likes: 242
Liked 29,156 Times in 14,097 Posts
|
|
On second look, the grip strap does appear to have been altered. Did you get it that way, or was that another gunsmith enhancement? Or is it an optical illusion?
|
02-08-2015, 08:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 595
Likes: 4,511
Liked 2,074 Times in 336 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWalt
|
Thank you. Those are the ones that I've been looking at.
|
02-08-2015, 08:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 595
Likes: 4,511
Liked 2,074 Times in 336 Posts
|
|
SixgunStrumpet and DWalt -
Will you explain to me what you're seeing? It looks different than a standard square butt N, but my understanding was that these old guns had a bit different frame. I only have a few pics of the gun before sending it to the gunsmith. If you can help me see what is off Imay be able to tell from the old images.
Thanks again.
|
02-08-2015, 08:47 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,548
Likes: 89,904
Liked 24,944 Times in 8,538 Posts
|
|
The finish looks good, but the lanyard loop is incorrect. It is way too big.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
02-08-2015, 08:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 595
Likes: 4,511
Liked 2,074 Times in 336 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muley Gil
The finish looks good, but the lanyard loop is incorrect. It is way too big.
|
I agree. I looked at the lanyard loops at Numrich. I'm hoping to be able to swap it out.
|
02-08-2015, 09:09 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,320
Likes: 34,034
Liked 10,993 Times in 3,961 Posts
|
|
He did that to the stocks without asking? I would consider demanding that he replace them.
That lanyard loop looks like a sling swivel for a rifle. He seems to just throw odds and ends together and call it good. I wouldn't let him touch anything of mine.
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
02-08-2015, 09:15 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cottage Grove,WI
Posts: 4,124
Likes: 1,540
Liked 5,518 Times in 1,650 Posts
|
|
The refinish is pretty nice,Everything else....Not my Cup of Tea.It looks like the front grip strap has been heated up and bowed in.
|
02-08-2015, 09:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 595
Likes: 4,511
Liked 2,074 Times in 336 Posts
|
|
The grip frame shape is the same as when I got the gun. I can't pass that part off on the 'smith. he didn't charge me for the lanyard ring. As long as he didn't alter the dimensions of the opening I can replace it. The grips burn me.
The possibility that things might go wrong is why I took him something that I didn't have much invested in, monetarily or sentimentally.
|
02-08-2015, 09:47 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 13,995
Liked 5,919 Times in 1,761 Posts
|
|
Colt New Service/1917 grips may be large enough, and of the proper shape, to be fitted to the gun. It appears that may be what the original grips you have were from. These guns are larger than S&W N-frames with correspondingly larger grips, so there may be enough wood to play with.
__________________
SWHF #448
Last edited by -db-; 02-08-2015 at 09:54 PM.
|
02-08-2015, 09:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 595
Likes: 4,511
Liked 2,074 Times in 336 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by -db-
A Colt New Service/1917 grip may be large enough, and of the proper shape, to be fitted to the gun. It appears that may be what the original grip you have was. These guns are larger than S&W N-frames with correspondingly larger grips.
|
Thanks. I'll check it out.
|
02-08-2015, 10:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Northern GA
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2,025
Liked 4,843 Times in 1,479 Posts
|
|
Hate the grips. The rest is just fine.
|
02-09-2015, 04:51 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,225
Likes: 34,869
Liked 10,792 Times in 3,677 Posts
|
|
Here's a side by side comparison of a Colt and S&W 1917. Don't know if this will help much, but...
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-09-2015, 05:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The free state of PA
Posts: 5,224
Likes: 5,721
Liked 8,584 Times in 2,782 Posts
|
|
I'd pull the grip panels and send them to a custom maker to see if a replacement set could be fabricated.
If I'm not mistaken, the period correct lanyard loop would be circular, similar to the Bowen model:
Lanyard Rings & Studs : + Bowen Classic Arms +, Parts Store
__________________
I'm with the banned ...
|
02-09-2015, 05:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 595
Likes: 4,511
Liked 2,074 Times in 336 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy
Here's a side by side comparison of a Colt and S&W 1917. Don't know if this will help much, but...
|
I see it. Thanks for the picture.
|
02-09-2015, 05:14 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Tucson
Posts: 130
Likes: 6
Liked 55 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
The grips were not right to start with. Top of the grips are just non-original but the cut-out, or milling at the top of the grip on the frame is still correctly shaped. Isn't the bottom flat of the grip frame (heel??) altered so that it is no longer parallel to the bore. If so, the serial number is gone unless someone re-stamped it. I don't think it is just distortion caused by the photo itself as the angle of the grip bottom looks the same in all pics. Does it look like that to everyone else?
|
02-09-2015, 05:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,644
Likes: 242
Liked 29,156 Times in 14,097 Posts
|
|
What posible purpose would anyone have in changing the shape of the gripstrap? In any case, about all that can be done is to attempt to shape some grip panels fit it. But the other question is more important. Is the original serial number on the butt OK?
|
02-09-2015, 05:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 595
Likes: 4,511
Liked 2,074 Times in 336 Posts
|
|
I'll have to check if the heel is parallel to the bore this evening. I agree that the grips were not original, since they fit the frame. The serial on the butt is present, but faint.
|
02-09-2015, 06:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,644
Likes: 242
Liked 29,156 Times in 14,097 Posts
|
|
So long as the SN is legible, you are legal. Fortunately, you do have some grips which fit the frame, and that should make modification of standard shaped grips simpler as you have a pattern to go by.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-09-2015, 08:39 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,252
Likes: 11,935
Liked 20,600 Times in 8,584 Posts
|
|
Correct butt markings and lanyard swivel:
Correct wood stocks unless the serial number is below ~ # 20,000. I'll send you a PM with sources for correct stocks:
Correct under barrel stamp:
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|