Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-17-2015, 06:50 AM
BibleronKJV BibleronKJV is offline
Member
Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P  
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Liked 88 Times in 56 Posts
Default Utica Police Dept. M&P

Anyone out there have a Utica Police Dept. M&P 38? I just picked up one with "U.P.D." on backstrap which was shipped 5-2-35 along with 79 others. Mine is #651471. Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Ron
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-17-2015, 03:19 PM
BibleronKJV BibleronKJV is offline
Member
Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P  
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Liked 88 Times in 56 Posts
Default

Something interesting struck me since posting my initial thread on the Utica....the 38/44 HD was the new "in thing" for Police Departments during the 1930's, but Utica chose to stay with the M&P rather than going for the 38/44. I wonder why? Finances? Hoping for some interesting input. Thanks, Ron
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-17-2015, 04:02 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 12,994
Likes: 5,027
Liked 7,722 Times in 2,633 Posts
Default

Ron, I don't own a Utica gun and have no personal knowledge of them, but I know some have been reported in forum threads over the years. The "Search" menu up there in the forum banner has a couple of options to choose from. Use the Google box at the top of the list in preference to the search function built into the forum software and look for "Utica P.D."
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-17-2015, 04:07 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,853
Likes: 252
Liked 29,499 Times in 14,231 Posts
Default

Regarding the HD .38/44 vs. the M&P, not too many PDs used the HD .38/44 at that time. I think there were only about 11,000 HDs total made during the pre-WWII period, and they were somewhat more costly than the M&P. About $80 difference in today's dollars. Even more so (probably about $200) for the .38/44 Outdoorsman. That was a major consideration during the great depression. And I think most cops felt that a M&P (or a Colt OP) was plenty good enough.

Last edited by DWalt; 05-17-2015 at 05:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-17-2015, 05:36 PM
Absalom's Avatar
Absalom Absalom is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,762
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BibleronKJV View Post
Something interesting struck me since posting my initial thread on the Utica....the 38/44 HD was the new "in thing" for Police Departments during the 1930's, but Utica chose to stay with the M&P rather than going for the 38/44. I wonder why? Finances? Hoping for some interesting input. Thanks, Ron
Pretty much what DWalt said. It's easy to overstate the importance of the 38/44 because as the "ancestor" of the .357 Magnums it holds such a special place for S&W historians and collectors.
But looking at the actual numbers in comparison to the production numbers for the M&P in .38 Spl., it really was more a novelty than an "in thing" for most police departments.
Of course Colt at that time still had the upper hand over S&W in the law enforcement market, and they actually bragged with the fact that the Official Police could handle the .38/44 ammo which the standard M&P couldn't.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-17-2015, 06:11 PM
BibleronKJV BibleronKJV is offline
Member
Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P  
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Liked 88 Times in 56 Posts
Default

David, Thank you for the info about the "Search" mode. I checked it and found out a little about the Utica and am hoping some of the forum members will be able to provide additional info. Thanks again for your help, Ron
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-20-2022, 11:11 AM
Dziadzi#1 Dziadzi#1 is offline
Member
Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P Utica Police Dept. M&P  
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 59
Likes: 19
Liked 90 Times in 23 Posts
Default

I had a 19 that I bought from a buddy that had been a Utica PD gun. It was in good shape and had the best trigger pull that I had ever felt.

He had shot magnum loads in it and had a gunsmith tighten it up occasionally. Finally the smith told him that he wouldn’t do it any more. My friend replaced it with a L frame gun and sold the 19 to me. I later sold it and bought a 28. I probably should have kept the 19 and still got the 28.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Austin Police Dept. 38/44 HD #58 ringo1597 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 13 10-09-2017 07:19 PM
M58 For Maryville, IL. Police Dept. rusty37874 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 6 02-11-2013 01:26 PM
Which Police Dept? Bush Pilot S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 2 09-03-2011 03:42 PM
Utica Police Department M&P Club Gun Fan S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 1 11-02-2009 12:34 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)