Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2015, 07:35 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,661
Likes: 1,226
Liked 18,659 Times in 7,385 Posts
Default How cheap would it have to be?

To get you to buy an M&P 2" Victory model that has a non-factory nickel plate job and has been bored for 38 special?

The finish is about 80% or so, but the bad thing is that some roll marks (barrel) have been polished completely off, and the rest - like the S&W shield - are pretty faint.
Mechanically it seems fine, no push off, or appreciable end shake, lockup seemed good.

So how cheap would it need to be for you to take it home? Anybody ever had an luck replacing a bored cylinder with a standard 38 special? Or would that take too much hand fitting on one of these older ones?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2015, 07:42 PM
vytoland's Avatar
vytoland vytoland is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 5,654
Likes: 15,661
Liked 7,682 Times in 2,744 Posts
Default

i would not be interested in the described revolver.....more than likely, the victory model in question did NOT leave the factory with a two inch barrel and has been cut down and reworked.......
__________________
There's nowt so queer as folk
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2015, 07:47 PM
22hipower 22hipower is offline
SWCA Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 4,284
Likes: 8,280
Liked 12,499 Times in 2,844 Posts
Default

I would not be interested in it either; agree with vytoland that the barrel has probably been cut along with the refinish. Not that I haven't bought one much like this in the past. . . . Think I paid about $100 for it but that was maybe fifteen years ago. After I figured out all the issues, traded it off for about what I paid for it. . .and was happy with the "education" I'd gotten. Good luck.

Jeff
SWCA #1457
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2015, 07:50 PM
Bekeart Bekeart is online now
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: KY - 4 Rivers
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 6,501
Liked 5,415 Times in 1,700 Posts
Default CHEAP Truck Gun

I would be willing to pay $150 for sure.

Would NOT try to replace cylinder.

As said above it has probably already be "overhauled".

My thinking is that it will still be reliable and go BANG when needed.

Bekeart
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 12-30-2015, 07:51 PM
bwade's Avatar
bwade bwade is offline
SWCA Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bristol, Tennessee
Posts: 437
Likes: 1,313
Liked 1,369 Times in 187 Posts
Default

If the hammer and trigger were plated, then its parts as a whole are not worth much either. When they cut the barrel to 2 inches, the cylinder latch does not usually work well since there is no barrel lug left on the barrel. Probably has ****** stocks too. At best, it might make a tackle box gun if it was safe to shoot.

bwade
__________________
Blaine
SWCA 3490 SWHF 586
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-30-2015, 08:03 PM
merl67 merl67 is offline
SWCA Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,897
Likes: 3,435
Liked 4,124 Times in 1,465 Posts
Default

If this is a a British one that was originally in 38 S&W and originally had a 5 inch barrel and now has a 2 inch barrel this means it no longer has the forward locking lug. Most would consider it a parts gun now especially with the heavy polishing maybe $100-125 to me. Pictures would be very helpful .

Last edited by merl67; 12-30-2015 at 08:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-30-2015, 08:06 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,922
Likes: 255
Liked 29,590 Times in 14,271 Posts
Default

If I wanted a cheap gun to keep under the front seat of a pickup truck or a throwaway, maybe $100 if no paperwork was involved. And only if I was certain it had no mechanical problems.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 12-30-2015, 08:14 PM
ralph7's Avatar
ralph7 ralph7 is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,366
Likes: 9,264
Liked 6,421 Times in 2,229 Posts
Default

Gotta be worth a c note.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-30-2015, 08:20 PM
Art Doc's Avatar
Art Doc Art Doc is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 49
Liked 13,416 Times in 3,292 Posts
Default

I would not accept it as a gift. It literally has zero value IMO.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 12-30-2015, 09:17 PM
Jack Flash's Avatar
Jack Flash Jack Flash is offline
SWCA Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,332
Likes: 34,297
Liked 11,017 Times in 3,972 Posts
Default

It might be worth something for teaching yourself how to disassemble / reassemble a S&W. And / or could be a donor gun you could glean parts off for use on a more worthy revolver.

You didn't mention stocks, which might be worth something.

I would have to see it, but all in all, maybe $50 to $100.
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 12-30-2015, 10:34 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,661
Likes: 1,226
Liked 18,659 Times in 7,385 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merl67 View Post
If this is a a British one that was originally in 38 S&W and originally had a 5 inch barrel and now has a 2 inch barrel this means it no longer has the forward locking lug. Most would consider it a parts gun now especially with the heavy polishing maybe $100-125 to me. Pictures would be very helpful .
It is definitely a Victory model originally chambered for 38 S&W. I tried both a 38 S&W and a 38 Special round and both dropped right in.

I don't think the barrel has been cut down. The front sight looked normal for an M&P as far as I can recall.

I'll have to take another look at it to see about the hammer and trigger finish. I didn't look at it that hard.

Last edited by BC38; 12-30-2015 at 10:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-30-2015, 10:46 PM
lebomm lebomm is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 38
Liked 821 Times in 490 Posts
Default

I wouldn't pay more than about 50 bux for such a gun, and even then, only if I could be convinced it was legal and mechanically solid.

Larry
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-30-2015, 10:52 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,661
Likes: 1,226
Liked 18,659 Times in 7,385 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lebomm View Post
I wouldn't pay more than about 50 bux for such a gun, and even then, only if I could be convinced it was legal and mechanically solid.

Larry
Well, since it is for sale in a retail shop I think the legal part is pretty well covered.

As for the mechanical condition, I didn't see any glaring problems, but would want to look it over a lot more closely.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-30-2015, 10:59 PM
steelslaver's Avatar
steelslaver steelslaver is offline
US Veteran
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,849
Likes: 13,136
Liked 40,111 Times in 10,186 Posts
Default

If I could get it for under $100 I would see how nice a K frame 32 S&W I could make it. Sleeve the cylinder and barrel and adapt the extractor. Even if it didn't come out perfect I would learn for another attempt.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 12-31-2015, 02:36 AM
Absalom's Avatar
Absalom Absalom is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,762
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38 View Post
......
I don't think the barrel has been cut down. The front sight looked normal for an M&P as far as I can recall.
.....
A 2" barrel on a .38 S&W is not original. No ifs and buts about it. If it does not have a front locking lug, it's cut, no matter how good the front sight looks. If it does have the lug, it's a replacement barrel.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 12-31-2015, 03:02 AM
k22fan k22fan is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,834
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,243 Times in 2,483 Posts
Default

Some of those turkeys were rechambered with a 3/8" drill. Your time and ammunition or reloading components budget is more wisely spent on a police surplus Model 10.

That said, if you would otherwise spend the time in a bar then this "investment" will put you money ahead. An old friend buys junky little pistols that he does not expect to feed, diagnoses, then fixes them only to sell them at a loss. He's a mechanical engineer by trade and seeks the challenge. To each their own.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-31-2015, 03:11 AM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,661
Likes: 1,226
Liked 18,659 Times in 7,385 Posts
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom View Post
A 2" barrel on a .38 S&W is not original. No ifs and buts about it. If it does not have a front locking lug, it's cut, no matter how good the front sight looks. If it does have the lug, it's a replacement barrel.
I was thinking it looked about like this one - and that it was a 38 S&W.
Pre-War 2" M&P
Is that one a 38 special?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-31-2015, 03:53 AM
alwslate alwslate is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,680
Likes: 3,768
Liked 7,301 Times in 3,039 Posts
Default

Again, if it has been cut there will be no front locking lug on the barrel.
If so and rechambered and heavily buffed and plated I wouldn't want
to shoot it so it couldn't be cheap enough. Better to apply the price
toward a gun that's solid and safe to fire.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-31-2015, 03:58 AM
Absalom's Avatar
Absalom Absalom is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,762
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,996 Times in 8,452 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38 View Post
I was thinking it looked about like this one - and that it was a 38 S&W.
Pre-War 2" M&P
Is that one a 38 special?
If it has that type of barrel, it's a replacement barrel. Only the .38 Special version of the Victory model was produced with an original 2" barrel in limited quantity.

Last edited by Absalom; 12-31-2015 at 04:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-31-2015, 04:04 AM
k22fan k22fan is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,834
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,243 Times in 2,483 Posts
Default

What did the rare 1935 .38 special M&P that you posted a link to ever do to deserve being mentioned in a thread about a reamed and hacked former British service revolver? Wash your mouth out with soap!

There were some Victory or pre-Victory .38 special snubs but you'd be extremely lucky to find an original cheap.

Due to lack of space for the patent #s & dates between the front sight and frame 2" pre-Model 10s and their predecessors have them on the right side of the barrel and two lines of writing on the left side of the barrel, one over the other.

Good, if not so historic, surplus Model 10 snubs are not that hard to find.

Last edited by k22fan; 12-31-2015 at 04:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-31-2015, 11:39 AM
THE PILGRIM's Avatar
THE PILGRIM THE PILGRIM is online now
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ALBUQUERQUE, NM
Posts: 14,001
Likes: 8,153
Liked 25,624 Times in 8,624 Posts
Default

I wouldn't pay anything for it.
Not sure if I would take it for free.
Not a gun I would want in my house.
__________________
NRA LIFE MEMBER
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #22  
Old 12-31-2015, 02:05 PM
BC38's Avatar
BC38 BC38 is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,661
Likes: 1,226
Liked 18,659 Times in 7,385 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by k22fan View Post
...There were some Victory or pre-Victory .38 special snubs but you'd be extremely lucky to find an original cheap...
Yeah, but I'm sure this isn't one of those - if it were the previously mentioned 38 S&W wouldn't have dropped into the chamber, right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by k22fan View Post
Due to lack of space for the patent #s & dates between the front sight and frame 2" pre-Model 10s and their predecessors have them on the right side of the barrel and two lines of writing on the left side of the barrel, one over the other...
And I'm thinking that may be how this one was before buffing. The photos of the previously mentioned 1935 M&P <gasp - how dare I mention it again in this thread?> showed those roll markings as being very small and shallow - which would explain their not surviving the buffing prior to plating.

I'm thinking Absolom may have hit on the answer. The barrel has probably been replaced. I'll go take another look at it just for grins. If it could be had cheaply enough I was thinking I might pick it up just as a curiosity and/or truck/tacklebox gun.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-31-2015, 02:51 PM
jrd1976 jrd1976 is offline
SWCA Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 665
Likes: 63
Liked 321 Times in 138 Posts
Default

My LGS sold one a couple of weeks ago for $75.00.

I was not interested.
The guy that bought it knew what he was getting.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-31-2015, 03:21 PM
Camster Camster is offline
Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,794
Likes: 993
Liked 1,923 Times in 956 Posts
Default

I wouldn't want it for free,given the road time necessary for me to add it to my license....(It could be one that's missing the front latch for the extractor rod too.)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-31-2015, 04:21 PM
Jack Flash's Avatar
Jack Flash Jack Flash is offline
SWCA Member
How cheap would it have to be? How cheap would it have to be?  
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,332
Likes: 34,297
Liked 11,017 Times in 3,972 Posts
Default

If it is a 2" replacement barrel (ie not a hack job) the barrel itself should be worth something. Then there are the stocks which we haven't heard about, and the other parts.

If worse came to worse, you could part it out for maybe $100.
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just how cheap are you? ChattanoogaPhil The Lounge 119 07-09-2015 11:30 AM
My Dad's cheap gun. sigp220.45 Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 25 01-25-2015 06:36 PM
Cheap 9mm at CTD larry8 Ammo 0 09-25-2012 08:52 AM
buy cheap before big buy! tylerrybkowski Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 2 01-29-2011 03:45 PM
3" 625/2.5 686 cheap!!! panamajack310 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 8 12-17-2008 06:05 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)