Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-13-2022, 06:37 AM
Blackpowderwarrior Blackpowderwarrior is offline
Member
1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry?  
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 8
Likes: 17
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry?

Guys,

Y'all sure have been awful helpful to a new comer. I really appreciate everyone's warm welcome and knowledge and I'm glad ive found this forum.

I have another question.

The title says it all. Is there any kind of safety mechanism that makes it safe to load all 6 in my 1896 hand ejector , or should I follow cowboy protocol and load 5 with hammer down on a empty?


Thanks,

BPW
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-13-2022, 07:28 AM
mrcvs mrcvs is offline
SWCA Member
1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry?  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,720
Likes: 3,475
Liked 7,831 Times in 2,081 Posts
Default

You should always load five and keep the hammer down on an empty chamber.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 07-13-2022, 09:14 AM
Model19man Model19man is offline
SWCA Member
1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry?  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 679
Liked 2,239 Times in 936 Posts
Default

I would say at the range with the barrel pointed down range at all times when it is loaded I would load six. If the 120+ year old revolver is being carried around then yes I would load five with an empty chamber under the hammer in case you drop it.
__________________
S&WHF #946
S&WCA #3824
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 07-13-2022, 09:23 AM
glowe's Avatar
glowe glowe is offline
US Veteran

1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry?  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 13,100
Likes: 3,357
Liked 16,206 Times in 6,023 Posts
Default

If you are setting at a shooting bench, no issue with 6 rounds. If you are considering it as a carry piece, I would look for another gun. The 1896 has a rebounding hammer and a crude hammer safety mechanism, but nothing as effective of that found on M&P and Model 1903 post-1914 revolvers. You cannot push the hammer forward on the 1st Model 32 HE, but I would not trust it if dropped on the hammer.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515

Last edited by glowe; 07-13-2022 at 09:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 07-13-2022, 02:29 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry?  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,161
Likes: 12,512
Liked 21,098 Times in 8,801 Posts
Default

I agree, use Cowboy protocol if you carry it. The Model 1896 rebounding hammer passive safety is rudimentary at best.

S&W Hand ejector safeties improved greatly before WWII. The later pre war models with either of the two side plate mounted safeties can be considered trustworthy IN A WELL MAINTAINED GUN.

However I would not say the S&W revolver safeties are foolproof until the post war sliding bar hammer block was added in the latter half of the 1940s. And I would not hesitate to carry any of those with a full cylinder.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819

Last edited by Hondo44; 07-13-2022 at 02:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 07-13-2022, 05:23 PM
Blackpowderwarrior Blackpowderwarrior is offline
Member
1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry?  
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 8
Likes: 17
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Thanks for the tips and suggestions guys. I really appreciate it. I live in the appalachian/Smokey mountains and this little 1896 smith will be my squirrel medicine this year.
So to answer your question about if I'll carry it, I will.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 07-13-2022, 07:19 PM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is offline
Member
1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry?  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 35,561
Likes: 331
Liked 32,147 Times in 15,297 Posts
Default

Most here would honorably retire an 1896 and find something a little newer to use on squirrel. This is primarily because if you damage or break an important part, it will be nearly impossible to repair or replace it, the result being that you have changed a fairly desirable and somewhat valuable revolver into a wall hanger of minimal value. But it’s your gun to do whatever you want with it.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 07-13-2022, 10:10 PM
Blackpowderwarrior Blackpowderwarrior is offline
Member
1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry? 1896 hand ejector 1st model. Load 6 or load 5 to safely carry?  
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 8
Likes: 17
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

@Dwalt

I appreciate and respect the advice brother.

its solid advice.

i didnt buy it to gawk at though. i wont be running her through the paces daily or anything but she will get some time on the playing field.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Model 1896 Hand ejector cjjohn S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 3 08-20-2015 05:34 PM
FS S&W First Model Hand Ejector 1896 saltflatswindler GUNS - For Sale or Trade 2 02-11-2014 04:41 PM
1896 Model 1 hand ejector WhiteFalcon1 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 12 02-13-2012 10:27 PM
.32 Hand Ejector Model of 1896 gripper S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 10 07-29-2010 12:15 AM
Low-end 1st Model 1896 .32 Hand Ejector jsmith S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 0 06-05-2010 08:30 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 PM.


© 2000-2025 smith-wessonforum.com All rights reserved worldwide.
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)