|
|
03-29-2024, 10:18 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Hanover, Virginia
Posts: 1,925
Likes: 3,272
Liked 5,714 Times in 1,411 Posts
|
|
103 year old 32-20 wcf - keyholing???
I think I have this in the right subforum but if not moderators feel free to move.
A month ago I finally got to shoot the 103 year old S&W 32-20 WCF when some ammo (HSM 115 gr Cowboy Action - Soft Lead Flat nose) was given to me for Christmas. EDIT: the full target pic is now added and the distance was 15 yards. The target was stapled onto a cardboard backer.
The other day, looking again at the target (Dirty Bird splatter) I wondered from the shape of the holes if possibly the gun was keyholing, and if so why?
The one photo is marked Inet meaning I took the image off the Internet and it is not mine, just to see what "keyholing" looks like from other sources. peoples prospective. EDIT: could not post the pic...invalid file type.
The other 4 pics are mine, the gun, the ammo, and the enlarged target "holes" along with a enlarged muzzle pic reflecting the pitting and erosion that has taken place over 100 plus years.
So....just asking........what do you folks think? Keyholing or not?
My other guns punch fairly clean true round holes in the same dirty bird targets, regardless of caliber, but I'm usually always shooting either FMJ, or semi jacketed ammo.
I do love shooting this old gun. The 5" barrel is real sweet for me on balance and the accuracy (or lack thereof) is all on me...not the gun. Ammo's big bucks, but I'm keeping the brass for eventual reloading in the future.
Just curious and looking for comments.
__________________
Charlie B
SWCA#3083, SWHF#570
Last edited by cmansguns; 03-29-2024 at 10:41 AM.
Reason: add distance and full target pic
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 10:27 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Front Range of Colorado
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 1,266
Liked 1,663 Times in 620 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmansguns
I think I have this in the right subforum but if not moderators feel free to move.
A month ago I finally got to shoot the 103 year old S&W 32-20 WCF when some ammo (HSM 115 gr Cowboy Action - Soft Lead Flat nose) was given to me for Christmas.
The other day, looking again at the target (Dirty Bird splatter) I wondered from the shape of the holes if possibly the gun was keyholing, and if so why?
The one photo is marked Inet meaning I took the image off the Internet and it is not mine, just to see what "keyholing" looks like from other sources. peoples prospective. EDIT: could not post the pic...invalid file type.
The other 4 pics are mine, the gun, the ammo, and the enlarged target "holes" along with a enlarged muzzle pic reflecting the pitting and erosion that has taken place over 100 plus years.
So....just asking........what do you folks think? Keyholing or not?
My other guns punch fairly clean true round holes in the same dirty bird targets, regardless of caliber, but I'm usually always shooting either FMJ, or semi jacketed ammo.
I do love shooting this old gun. The 5" barrel is real sweet for me on balance and the accuracy (or lack thereof) is all on me...not the gun. Ammo's big bucks, but I'm keeping the brass for eventual reloading in the future.
Just curious and looking for comments.
|
What distance are you shooting?
Have you shot any "normal" heavy paper stock targets? If so, what do those holes look like?
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 10:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,481
Liked 8,136 Times in 3,679 Posts
|
|
Try some different ammo .
Lead bullets at low velocity usually don't play well with "pitting and erosion ".
And check the barrel crown ... 100 years of cleaning may have left some wear a the muzzle and / or crown and that can send them off on a wonky course .
Were all four corners of your target taped down to a stiff backer board ...
floppy targets show oval holes also .
All it might need is different ammo it likes ...old men and revolvers tend to get crotchety in their old age !
Godd Luck ... Sweet Shooter !
Gary
__________________
Certified Cajun
NRA Member
Last edited by gwpercle; 03-29-2024 at 10:44 AM.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 11:00 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SW MT
Posts: 6,738
Likes: 10,517
Liked 6,034 Times in 2,972 Posts
|
|
As Gary said, I only see staple holes in the top of the target. It may not have been tacked down but that does look like keyholing. A larger cast bullet or jacketed loads would be next to try.
__________________
Front sight and squeeze
Last edited by mtgianni; 03-30-2024 at 06:36 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 11:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Midwest
Posts: 241
Likes: 1,121
Liked 693 Times in 154 Posts
|
|
The oval bullet hole orientation looks to be identical for each shot. In my (limited) experience with keyholing, the orientation of the hole has been more random. I think what's happening there is just some consistent flexing of the target upon impact.
__________________
Ain't This Fun Though?
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 12:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 94
Likes: 101
Liked 184 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
I'm gonna say those HSM Cowboy loads are possibly undersize bullets for your revolver.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 02:48 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Monroe cnty. Ohio
Posts: 6,951
Likes: 4,431
Liked 10,072 Times in 3,692 Posts
|
|
My experience with 32/20s is to find the diameter of the bullet that your particular gun likes. This is allowing that you don’t have major pitting or crown damage. Also the heavier bullets tend to shoot better, 115gr. I have tried light bullets and found them with much to be desired in accuracy dept.
Have not had any luck with factory jackets or ammo. That goes for rifles and revolvers pre WW2. I’m shooting cast RCBS 115g sized .313” in my
1905 HE manf 1906-07. Same in old 1910 Marlin 1894 but different powder and charge.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 02:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 814
Likes: 22
Liked 1,914 Times in 467 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OutAtTheEdge
The oval bullet hole orientation looks to be identical for each shot. In my (limited) experience with keyholing, the orientation of the hole has been more random. I think what's happening there is just some consistent flexing of the target upon impact.
|
^^^^^^^^^^This. Pattern is too uniform to be keyholeing. All of the holes are elongated vertically with no tearing. What you have is slow flat nosed bullets rolling the target before they punch through.
Last edited by Dvus; 03-29-2024 at 03:03 PM.
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 03:30 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 11,163
Liked 12,134 Times in 1,942 Posts
|
|
I agree with all of the suggestions being offered. As a loooong time shooter of old and even older guns (your gun's bore looks pretty good to me) in additon to the bore diamerte issue I'd be looking fore HAED lead bullets like wheel weight grade castings. Another smal thing to be looking as is the bullet luibe. Goood luck, and be patient.
__________________
Randy
Provenance nerd
Last edited by quinn; 03-29-2024 at 03:32 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 03:37 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 666
Liked 1,575 Times in 668 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmansguns
A month ago I finally got to shoot the 103 year old S&W 32-20 WCF when some ammo (HSM 115 gr Cowboy Action - Soft Lead Flat nose) was given to me for Christmas.
|
I bought two boxes of the same ammo for my S&W Model 1899. It shot just fine for me. My barrel looks much better than yours but it seems like your accuracy was pretty good too. I don't think your ammo is keyholing but a bigger lead bullet might tighten up your group some.
__________________
S&WHF #946
S&WCA #3824
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 04:20 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA & SoFL
Posts: 8,699
Likes: 473
Liked 5,748 Times in 3,213 Posts
|
|
Hey Charlie B, gun question. On pic #1 of the left side of the gun.
What is the mark on the side under the thumb cyl. release? Cant make it out?
Got my glasse, see it now!
__________________
Mike 2796
SoFo Bunch member
Last edited by gmborkovic; 03-29-2024 at 04:41 PM.
Reason: expand
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 04:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central New York State
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 3,471
Liked 2,113 Times in 632 Posts
|
|
That is not keyholing. Bullets flying sideways or tumbling will never be in any kind of group as far as I know. At times you will even be lucky to hit a target of that size at 15 yards. Plus, you have what appears to be enough difference between the dimensions of the lands and grooves for the soft lead to grab and start the bullet spinning properly.
Last edited by bigmoose; 03-29-2024 at 04:34 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 04:59 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,597
Likes: 3,715
Liked 8,952 Times in 3,558 Posts
|
|
Those holes look more like a result of the type of target used rather than the bullet tumbling. I wonder if in a self defense situation a tumbling bullet would be more effective and one that did not.
Either way I do not see what appears to be elongated holes due to the bullet tumbling....
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 05:23 PM
|
Suspended
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,747
Likes: 1,590
Liked 8,916 Times in 3,555 Posts
|
|
That is not key-holing. As others have pointed out if you were seeing key-holing the orientation of the holes would be random. Also the hole from the nose of the bullet would be clearly different from the base area of the hole. You would also see holes that showed the individual bullets were striking the target anywhere from slightly able to see they were not traveling point on to holes that showed that the bullets were completely sideways. The holes in your target are remarkably consistent in shape and that indicates the appearance of the holes is due to the characteristics of the paper and how it was mounted/hung.
If you are near a gun shop that sells real NRA Official match targets then buy some of them, or buy them on-line, and compare how the holes appear in them. The paper of official targets is designed to show consistent round holes. They may be a bit fuzzy and show minor tears, but they will be generally round so long as the bullet strikes them straight on. While you are at it increase your range to 25 yards or greater. If the ammunition/gun combination is key-holing it will get progressively worse as range increases.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-29-2024, 11:18 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 3,428
Liked 4,120 Times in 1,462 Posts
|
|
Keyholes never look that consistent I agree with others just the target flexing shoot into some heavy cardboard, and I bet you get nice round holes....
__________________
Randy
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-30-2024, 07:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Florida Swamp
Posts: 226
Likes: 1,270
Liked 329 Times in 144 Posts
|
|
A lot of very important things have to happen before any hole gets punched through paper and those you posted look like you could fold them back and see round rings of lead. IMO you shot enough to prove no key holes and the function of the gun (barrel).
With the sights on the gun and its first available ammunition, I would be pleased with your results.
I say STEEL at 25
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-30-2024, 08:31 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 1,606
Liked 6,324 Times in 2,300 Posts
|
|
It seems to want to shoot high left, but if you centered the group on the target they'd all be in the 9 ring. As everybody said, not keyholing and given it's age that's more than acceptable accuracy for the gun, the ammo, and the shooter.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-30-2024, 10:33 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,481
Liked 8,136 Times in 3,679 Posts
|
|
I went back and looked more closely at the target ... I'm hard of seeing ... they look conspicuously identically oval ... not typical of keyholes .
Shoot another target with all four corners tacked/ taped down to a stiff backer board ... I would love to see what that shows ...
It may not be the revolver or ammo ... just the Target !
That would be an Easy Fix !
Gary
__________________
Certified Cajun
NRA Member
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-31-2024, 11:28 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Hanover, Virginia
Posts: 1,925
Likes: 3,272
Liked 5,714 Times in 1,411 Posts
|
|
No keyholing...just my eyes, the Internet, and bad target mounting!
Many thanks to all for the tips, comments and advice. I went back to the Internet and looked at a bunch of true "keyhole" targets and it is obvious that not only random, but all over the big targets and even outside of target suspected.
I see what has been posted about the uniformity of my shots, and for sure I only had staples at the top. I also remember that i hit the range late in the day, and as usual, the cardboard backer had been shot completely out in the "center" so yes......my target was flapping in the wind for sure and that HSM ammo is listed at 850 fps at the muzzle of a 5" test barrel, so probably barely moving at 15 yards.
This 32-20 and my 5" Model 10 no dash (1959) were basically my first outing with soft lead flat nose (32-20) and Lead Round Nose 158 gr, in the 38 Special. The 38 special shot decent clean holes without much elongation so that is why I posted about possible keyholing with the 32-20.
Anyway.........again thanks very much for the comments and advice. Next outing with the 32-20 I'll take all above advice to heart and see what those results look like. It is a great fun gun for sure.
PS for Mike (gmborkovic): That "mark" below the cylinder latch is actually the S&W trademark logo roll stamp. Interesting is that it is the smallest logo I have encountered on all my S & W's. It measures exactly 0.421" from the top of the "A" in "TRADE to the bottom right leg of the "A" in "MARK", and exactly 0.333" across the circle from 3 o'clock to 9 o'clock. I saw a post recently where Gary (glowe) I think had posted some information about different size of logos on these prewar guns but can't find it now.
__________________
Charlie B
SWCA#3083, SWHF#570
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-31-2024, 11:34 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,548
Likes: 89,904
Liked 24,944 Times in 8,538 Posts
|
|
"PS for Mike (gmborkovic): That "mark" below the cylinder latch is actually the S&W trademark logo roll stamp."
I think he was talking about the end of the hammer stud.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-31-2024, 11:44 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 179
Liked 4,301 Times in 2,112 Posts
|
|
IMO what you are seeing is a result of the grain direction of the paper target and NOT keyholing. Round nose bullets will produce torn edges at the bullet hole and the grain direction of the paper controls how that paper tears. If you want to see a clear demonstration of this then rotate the target paper by 90 degrees before shooting it. Had you used two different targets of the same paper and rotated one what you would have would be one target with oval holes in a vertical orientation and one target with oval holes in a horizontal orientation. It's the primary reason why the wad cutter bullet was designed because they produce very clean edged holes in a target.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-31-2024, 12:26 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA & SoFL
Posts: 8,699
Likes: 473
Liked 5,748 Times in 3,213 Posts
|
|
Charlie, I meant the small Trademark. Didnt have my glasses on.
__________________
Mike 2796
SoFo Bunch member
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|