|
|
 |
06-01-2011, 05:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 3,155
Liked 3,122 Times in 776 Posts
|
|
To answer the question I'll ask a question.
How many M27's have you seen out of time?
How many Pythons?
End of story for me anyway. Have owned both in the past and not to rain on anyone's parade but...the Smith is the MUCH more durable product and I also think it's the shooter, not the gun, as far as accuracy goes.
Just my .02. YMMV, and almost certainly will.
|
06-01-2011, 05:42 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by .357magger
To answer the question I'll ask a question.
How many M27's have you seen out of time?
How many Pythons?
End of story for me anyway. Have owned both in the past and not to rain on anyone's parade but...the Smith is the MUCH more durable product and I also think it's the shooter, not the gun, as far as accuracy goes.
Just my .02. YMMV, and almost certainly will.
|
I'd bet my M-27 that more Pythons have been hurt by rapid dry firing , feeling that super slick action , and boneheaded attempts at home gunsmithing , than have been hurt by honest use.
|
|
|
Tags
|
22lr, 357 magnum, 586, 686, bullseye, ccw, cocobolo, colt, ejector, hogue, k-22, m14, m27, model 14, model 19, model 27, n-frame, ppc, primer, ribbed, rrwo, ruger, sig arms, taurus, trooper  |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
