|
 |

03-26-2018, 10:13 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wilson, NC
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 470
Liked 839 Times in 381 Posts
|
|
History of the Model 67?
Can anyone post a dash-history of the Model 67, please?
That is, the list of changes that each subsequent dash incorporated.
Thanks in advance.
|

03-26-2018, 10:31 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 185
Likes: 50
Liked 99 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
Not much to tell.
Model 67 was introduced in 1972, The 1977 "-1" moved the gas ring from yolk to cylinder
|

03-26-2018, 10:43 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 185
Likes: 50
Liked 99 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert Rat 416
Not much to tell.
Model 67 was introduced in 1972, The 1977 "-1" moved the gas ring from yolk to cylinder
|
Sorry - that was supposed to be "yoke" to cylinder. More coffee helps my spelling quite a bit.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|

03-26-2018, 10:46 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wilson, NC
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 470
Liked 839 Times in 381 Posts
|
|
I was thinking that at some point the red-insert front sight was introduced....and then the tapered barrel was done away with....and then they drilled a hole in the side of it and put a lock on it.... Etc.
|

03-26-2018, 11:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Morgan Co, IN
Posts: 667
Likes: 475
Liked 462 Times in 259 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triggernosis
I was thinking that at some point the red-insert front sight was introduced....and then the tapered barrel was done away with....and then they drilled a hole in the side of it and put a lock on it.... Etc.
|
It is offered again now with the lock & a red ramp.
__________________
K & N S&W revolvers
|

03-26-2018, 11:56 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 185
Likes: 50
Liked 99 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
Apologies, yep, S&W currently makes a revolver simply called the "Model 67," and now its in a caliber of one's choice. Kind of like Ford currently makes a car called "the Mustang," and I way missed the mark on the context of the question.
As far as the original Model 67 and a 67-1, I have one of each. Both have red ramp front sights, and are indistinguishable until you pull out the yoke and cylinder for cleaning.
Hope someone comes along soon with more info on the later models.
|

03-26-2018, 12:27 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,358
Likes: 3,991
Liked 51,955 Times in 6,163 Posts
|
|
Since you asked, here is an advance look at a future article on the Model 67 - it should answer your questions.
John
The S & W Model 67 .38 Special Revolver
Chevys. Fords. Hot dogs. Apple pie. Smith & Wesson .38 Special revolvers. All have been around for quite some time, and are as familiar to us as the backs of our hands. Maybe you didn’t realize it, but revolvers chambered for the .38 Special cartridge have been part of our United States heritage since the dawn of the 20th Century. Smith & Wesson first introduced its .38 Military “Hand Ejector” in 1899. It was the very first S&W medium frame (later to be known as the “K-frame”) double-action swing-out cylinder revolver. This handgun was chambered for two .38 caliber cartridges; the U.S. service round, also called the .38 Long Colt, and the then-new and slightly longer .38 Special. The .38 Special was first charged with black powder. Soon thereafter, it was routinely loaded with smokeless powder. In 1902, the .38 Military was slightly modified to include an extractor rod lug under the barrel. This arrangement has continued to the present day.
Both the .38 Special and the S&W revolvers that chambered it became enormously popular. The .38 Special has become the most accepted center fire handgun round in the U.S. today. When introduced it quickly became the de facto standard for police forces nationwide. It’s also been used by our military, and many civilians have found that Smith’s K-frames handle “just right.” The .38 Special, first lacking some punch with low velocities and round nose bullets, is no slouch today. Strengthened guns, higher velocity loadings and expanding bullets have made modern rounds more than adequate for self-defense. Double action revolvers are perhaps the most reliable handguns made, and learning to use them is a piece of cake for almost everybody.
The .357 Magnum cartridge was introduced in 1935 by S&W in a heavy N-frame revolver. It could also chamber the shorter .38 Special. The gun became popular, but a steady demand for lighter .38 special guns continued. Many folks preferred them over the heavy-recoiling magnums; they were much more manageable and pleasant to shoot. Quick follow-up shots were much easier to execute, particularly in the medium-size K-frames.
The S&W K-frames have come a long way since they were first conceived so long ago. While the first ones could fire if dropped on their hammers, S&W soon developed a hammer block that allowed firing only when the trigger was deliberately pulled. The first method used could be less than reliable if rust or congealed gun oil inhibited the block from moving into position. During World War II, a second method was developed – a positively-activated sliding block that is virtually impossible to defeat in use. It’s still standard for external-hammer-equipped Smith & Wesson revolvers today.
.38 Special revolvers are still quite widely used, and S&W has continued to refine and improve the breed. The “Military and Police” K-frame revolvers evolved into what is now known as the Model 10 following Smith’s use of model numbers for its guns in 1957. Micrometer adjustable sights and a sloped (Baughman) front sight characterized the “K-38 Combat Masterpiece” revolver. This was considered the ultimate .38 revolver at the time for serious social work. It was available either blued or nickel plated. This fine revolver became the Model 15 in 1957. Many were used in our armed forces.
In 1972, S&W took the Model 15 a step further, making a new gun that was even more desirable for defense and severe usage. The Model 67 “K-38 Combat Masterpiece Stainless” was essentially the same gun as the Model 15, except that it was made with stainless steel rather than being blued or plated. It was a 6-shot handgun, and weighed 34 ounces empty. A 4” pinned barrel was standard, and the front sight soon after introduction was fitted with a red plastic insert for higher visibility. The first rear sights were also made from stainless steel, but these were soon changed to black to prevent sight glare. Both the rear sight leaf and the barrel rib were grooved. Unlike its .357 brother, the Model 66, the new 67s had no ejector shroud and the barrels were tapered to save weight. Walnut frame-fitting “magna” stocks were standard. The backstrap and forestrap had 10 grooves for better retention. An overtravel stop for the trigger was incorporated, but it can be easily removed if desired. This gun will handle +P and +P+ heavy loadings as well as the old 38/44 increased pressure rounds.
Many police departments from the 1940s through the mid-1980s still stuck with the .38 Special cartridge, and specified guns chambered for it as their standard issue. A good number of departments carrying .357 revolvers required their officers to use only .38 Special rounds in them, fearing over-penetration and liability for injury to nearby innocent bystanders. The Model 67 found its niche with the police, and many used examples will be found today with police identification markings.
Model 67s underwent some changes over the years. In 1977 with the Model 67-1, the gas ring was changed in location from the yoke to the cylinder. The handgun illustrated is one of these, and left the factory in April, 1978. It was obtained from the estate of an individual who bought it new but seldom fired it. The nostalgic pinned barrel was abandoned in 1982 to speed production. In 1988, the Model 67-2 appeared, featuring a new yoke retention system, a “floating” hand (the part that rotates the cylinder), a radius stud package that eliminated the pins in the hand, and a re-designed hammer nose bushing. 1993 saw the Model 67-3, involving a change in the configuration of the extractor. The frame was also drilled and tapped under the slightly modified rear sight leaf for scope mounts. Additionally, rubber Hogue grips were used. In 1996, the square butt was dropped in favor of the round version. Then in 1997, the shape of the cylinder release thumbpiece was changed to a “tear-drop” configuration, and the trigger became a metal injection molded (MIM) part.
With the Model 67-4 in 1998, the frame was changed to eliminate the cylinder stop stud, the grip frame grooving was stopped, MIM parts were used, and a floating firing pin in the frame necessitated some changes to the internals. The formerly graceful profile of the frame was, in my opinion, negatively affected. In 2001, to help comply with numerous regulations, a fired case was included with each gun shipped. In 2002, an internal key lock system was introduced with the Model 67-5. This was a sop to certain overzealous “gun control” politicians. The “ugly hole in the side” is still controversial, and many feel it has no place on any handgun, since possible malfunctions of the key lock could tie up the gun and be disastrous in defense situations. Interestingly, some “dash 5s” have been observed to have shipped as recently as late 2016; these were determined to be “cleanups” using in-stock older parts.
In 2004, a two-piece sleeved barrel was authorized for the Model 67-6. Also appearing were some heavy non-tapered conventional barrels with no ejector shroud. These were probably older parts cleanups. The Model 67-6 is still being made and continues to be popular.
Although semiautomatics and “plastic”-framed pistols have now become all the rage, the Model 67 is still in demand, particularly in the civilian sector. It has been continuously manufactured since 1972. Those who think the .38 Special cartridge is dead definitely have another think coming! It’s still well-liked and available everywhere. The Model 67 represents perhaps the finest example of a medium-frame revolver in this caliber, and occupies a singular place among the classics. The first ones and the “dash 1” examples are the most sought after and the prices on these earlier revolvers continue to escalate.
(c) 2018 JLM
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
|
The Following 56 Users Like Post:
|
71vette, 99savage308, adwjc, ancient-one, Baxter6551, Birdhunter6, bmcgilvray, CajunBass, cjtraining, Cuda, D Brown, Delta Rose, double-dipper, Doug M., edl, GB, Green Frog, growr, Hair Trigger, JayCeeNC, Jimmyjones, jurnes, K Frame Keith, LoadedRound, loc n load, LPD256, lrrifleman, medic15al, MG-70, mikerjf, mikeruns, Model 10-8, Moo Moo, moonsterman, MSD2343, mwozniak, Narragansett, njdet354, OIF2, pasound, PeteC, Peter_G, philbrook3, RoadVirus, robvious, Rpg, RSBH44, TAROMAN, TheHobbyist, Thin Man, trailmix, trinorbsa, Valmet, veeklog1, wcat94, Xfuzz |

03-26-2018, 02:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wilson, NC
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 470
Liked 839 Times in 381 Posts
|
|
Thanks, Paladin - that's exactly what I was looking for.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

03-26-2018, 02:23 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 8,002
Likes: 35,764
Liked 29,699 Times in 6,016 Posts
|
|
Here is my 67 no dash. I got it 10 or 15 years ago. It was in pitiful
condition. I had it bead blasted, put the red insert in the ramp, etc.
Show at right resting in one of it's favorite holsters. S.D. Myres #624.
__________________
In Omnia Paratus
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|

03-26-2018, 06:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 4,829
Likes: 3,291
Liked 9,729 Times in 3,430 Posts
|
|
Paladin,
Excellent article.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

03-12-2021, 04:08 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 160
Likes: 65
Liked 127 Times in 67 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PALADIN85020
Since you asked, here is an advance look at a future article on the Model 67 - it should answer your questions.
John
The S & W Model 67 .38 Special Revolver
Chevys. Fords. Hot dogs. Apple pie. Smith & Wesson .38 Special revolvers. All have been around for quite some time, and are as familiar to us as the backs of our hands. Maybe you didn’t realize it, but revolvers chambered for the .38 Special cartridge have been part of our United States heritage since the dawn of the 20th Century. Smith & Wesson first introduced its .38 Military “Hand Ejector” in 1899. It was the very first S&W medium frame (later to be known as the “K-frame”) double-action swing-out cylinder revolver. This handgun was chambered for two .38 caliber cartridges; the U.S. service round, also called the .38 Long Colt, and the then-new and slightly longer .38 Special. The .38 Special was first charged with black powder. Soon thereafter, it was routinely loaded with smokeless powder. In 1902, the .38 Military was slightly modified to include an extractor rod lug under the barrel. This arrangement has continued to the present day.
Both the .38 Special and the S&W revolvers that chambered it became enormously popular. The .38 Special has become the most accepted center fire handgun round in the U.S. today. When introduced it quickly became the de facto standard for police forces nationwide. It’s also been used by our military, and many civilians have found that Smith’s K-frames handle “just right.” The .38 Special, first lacking some punch with low velocities and round nose bullets, is no slouch today. Strengthened guns, higher velocity loadings and expanding bullets have made modern rounds more than adequate for self-defense. Double action revolvers are perhaps the most reliable handguns made, and learning to use them is a piece of cake for almost everybody.
The .357 Magnum cartridge was introduced in 1935 by S&W in a heavy N-frame revolver. It could also chamber the shorter .38 Special. The gun became popular, but a steady demand for lighter .38 special guns continued. Many folks preferred them over the heavy-recoiling magnums; they were much more manageable and pleasant to shoot. Quick follow-up shots were much easier to execute, particularly in the medium-size K-frames.
The S&W K-frames have come a long way since they were first conceived so long ago. While the first ones could fire if dropped on their hammers, S&W soon developed a hammer block that allowed firing only when the trigger was deliberately pulled. The first method used could be less than reliable if rust or congealed gun oil inhibited the block from moving into position. During World War II, a second method was developed – a positively-activated sliding block that is virtually impossible to defeat in use. It’s still standard for external-hammer-equipped Smith & Wesson revolvers today.
.38 Special revolvers are still quite widely used, and S&W has continued to refine and improve the breed. The “Military and Police” K-frame revolvers evolved into what is now known as the Model 10 following Smith’s use of model numbers for its guns in 1957. Micrometer adjustable sights and a sloped (Baughman) front sight characterized the “K-38 Combat Masterpiece” revolver. This was considered the ultimate .38 revolver at the time for serious social work. It was available either blued or nickel plated. This fine revolver became the Model 15 in 1957. Many were used in our armed forces.
In 1972, S&W took the Model 15 a step further, making a new gun that was even more desirable for defense and severe usage. The Model 67 “K-38 Combat Masterpiece Stainless” was essentially the same gun as the Model 15, except that it was made with stainless steel rather than being blued or plated. It was a 6-shot handgun, and weighed 34 ounces empty. A 4” pinned barrel was standard, and the front sight soon after introduction was fitted with a red plastic insert for higher visibility. The first rear sights were also made from stainless steel, but these were soon changed to black to prevent sight glare. Both the rear sight leaf and the barrel rib were grooved. Unlike its .357 brother, the Model 66, the new 67s had no ejector shroud and the barrels were tapered to save weight. Walnut frame-fitting “magna” stocks were standard. The backstrap and forestrap had 10 grooves for better retention. An overtravel stop for the trigger was incorporated, but it can be easily removed if desired. This gun will handle +P and +P+ heavy loadings as well as the old 38/44 increased pressure rounds.
Many police departments from the 1940s through the mid-1980s still stuck with the .38 Special cartridge, and specified guns chambered for it as their standard issue. A good number of departments carrying .357 revolvers required their officers to use only .38 Special rounds in them, fearing over-penetration and liability for injury to nearby innocent bystanders. The Model 67 found its niche with the police, and many used examples will be found today with police identification markings.
Model 67s underwent some changes over the years. In 1977 with the Model 67-1, the gas ring was changed in location from the yoke to the cylinder. The handgun illustrated is one of these, and left the factory in April, 1978. It was obtained from the estate of an individual who bought it new but seldom fired it. The nostalgic pinned barrel was abandoned in 1982 to speed production. In 1988, the Model 67-2 appeared, featuring a new yoke retention system, a “floating” hand (the part that rotates the cylinder), a radius stud package that eliminated the pins in the hand, and a re-designed hammer nose bushing. 1993 saw the Model 67-3, involving a change in the configuration of the extractor. The frame was also drilled and tapped under the slightly modified rear sight leaf for scope mounts. Additionally, rubber Hogue grips were used. In 1996, the square butt was dropped in favor of the round version. Then in 1997, the shape of the cylinder release thumbpiece was changed to a “tear-drop” configuration, and the trigger became a metal injection molded (MIM) part.
With the Model 67-4 in 1998, the frame was changed to eliminate the cylinder stop stud, the grip frame grooving was stopped, MIM parts were used, and a floating firing pin in the frame necessitated some changes to the internals. The formerly graceful profile of the frame was, in my opinion, negatively affected. In 2001, to help comply with numerous regulations, a fired case was included with each gun shipped. In 2002, an internal key lock system was introduced with the Model 67-5. This was a sop to certain overzealous “gun control” politicians. The “ugly hole in the side” is still controversial, and many feel it has no place on any handgun, since possible malfunctions of the key lock could tie up the gun and be disastrous in defense situations. Interestingly, some “dash 5s” have been observed to have shipped as recently as late 2016; these were determined to be “cleanups” using in-stock older parts.
In 2004, a two-piece sleeved barrel was authorized for the Model 67-6. Also appearing were some heavy non-tapered conventional barrels with no ejector shroud. These were probably older parts cleanups. The Model 67-6 is still being made and continues to be popular.
Although semiautomatics and “plastic”-framed pistols have now become all the rage, the Model 67 is still in demand, particularly in the civilian sector. It has been continuously manufactured since 1972. Those who think the .38 Special cartridge is dead definitely have another think coming! It’s still well-liked and available everywhere. The Model 67 represents perhaps the finest example of a medium-frame revolver in this caliber, and occupies a singular place among the classics. The first ones and the “dash 1” examples are the most sought after and the prices on these earlier revolvers continue to escalate.
(c) 2018 JLM
|
Hey, I realize that this is an old thread but you seem knowledgeable on 67s. I noticed your history mentioned late shipments of 67-5 models which caught my interest. I just purchased a new 67-5 earlier this week. The shop owner says that two 67-5 showed up in a recent shipment, do you know why S&W is shipping -5 models in 2021? FWIW the S/N is DNL44xx. My S&W book does not list this S/N.
__________________
Useless political propaganda
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

03-12-2021, 04:20 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,358
Likes: 3,991
Liked 51,955 Times in 6,163 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trailmix
Hey, I realize that this is an old thread but you seem knowledgeable on 67s. I noticed your history mentioned late shipments of 67-5 models which caught my interest. I just purchased a new 67-5 earlier this week. The shop owner says that two 67-5 showed up in a recent shipment, do you know why S&W is shipping -5 models in 2021? FWIW the S/N is DNL44xx. My S&W book does not list this S/N.
|
I suspect that it was a cleanup of older parts - S&W doesn't like to waste any parts than can be used for saleable handguns!
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

03-12-2021, 06:38 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 160
Likes: 65
Liked 127 Times in 67 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PALADIN85020
I suspect that it was a cleanup of older parts - S&W doesn't like to waste any parts than can be used for saleable handguns!
John
|
Did they just have some spare bits lying around and throw them together? I wonder what the date range for the S/N is.
__________________
Useless political propaganda
|

03-13-2021, 09:32 AM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,358
Likes: 3,991
Liked 51,955 Times in 6,163 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trailmix
Did they just have some spare bits lying around and throw them together? I wonder what the date range for the S/N is.
|
The last time this happened was 2016 - as you may probably know, S&W does not ship in serial number order. The short answer to your questions is "Who knows?"
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

03-13-2021, 11:19 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 160
Likes: 65
Liked 127 Times in 67 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PALADIN85020
The last time this happened was 2016 - as you may probably know, S&W does not ship in serial number order. The short answer to your questions is "Who knows?"
John
|
Thanks, I appreciate you sharing your knowledge. I was just confused when I ran across this, I assumed that when the -6 came out that the -5 was history but obviously that is not the case.
__________________
Useless political propaganda
|

03-13-2021, 02:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 863
Liked 2,090 Times in 729 Posts
|
|
Count me in as a big fan.
My current carry piece is a model 67 no dash in an El Paso Saddlery Sky six rig.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

03-13-2021, 03:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 290
Likes: 238
Liked 154 Times in 84 Posts
|
|
Great, short, article! I'm partial to stainless, and find the 67 with the tapered barrel to be one of, if not The classiest, stainless, revolver, ever produced. I even prefer the looks of it over the more functional, or beneficial, models with an ejector rod shroud.
Thank you for posting the article!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

03-13-2021, 04:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,464
Likes: 471
Liked 5,956 Times in 1,849 Posts
|
|
A no-dash 67 with the stainless rear sight has been my wife's house gun since the late 70s. Evidently it was NOS and had been in inventory for awhile. She owns other handguns, and even other .38 Specials, but when she says "my .38" there is no question what she means.
__________________
I need ammo, not a ride.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

03-15-2021, 09:10 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hillsdale, Mi.
Posts: 7,716
Likes: 7,401
Liked 7,465 Times in 3,091 Posts
|
|
My 67 no dash shipped in 1973. This example has the all stainless rear sights. S&W got complaints about glare from them. They later changed them to blue to remedy this. Bob
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

03-15-2021, 10:06 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 2,459
Liked 2,051 Times in 797 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bananaman
My 67 no dash shipped in 1973. This example has the all stainless rear sights. S&W got complaints about glare from them. They later changed them to blue to remedy this. Bob
|
I like the stainless sights just fine, but then again the gun was made to be used under all conditions, not just at the range. Besides, it is sort-of fun to have a "first-year of manufacture example,
Until I got the SCSW book I did not realize there was a full five years between the Model 60, and the 64, 66 and 67. Never had the time to investigate.
Mine is s/n 3K59xxx, so around 1972~73.
Last edited by PeteC; 03-15-2021 at 10:22 AM.
Reason: pics added
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

03-15-2021, 04:28 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ames Iowa
Posts: 870
Likes: 14
Liked 1,023 Times in 501 Posts
|
|
My no dash has stainless front and rear sights. 1972, first year of production.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

08-09-2021, 08:06 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 1,220
Liked 2,764 Times in 877 Posts
|
|
Have Model 67-1 on the way non pinned barrel , don't know if black has worn off barrel rib and front sight or just grime.
Last edited by jbtrucker; 08-09-2021 at 08:12 AM.
|

08-10-2021, 08:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Enola, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,492
Likes: 642
Liked 2,865 Times in 1,220 Posts
|
|
I have posted these photos in other threads but this is a no-dash Model 67 I bought two or three years ago for $300 plus some shipping costs with no stocks. Now before anyone accuses me of grand theft revolver, I should mention that it had been polished to a blinding shine that would make a 1969 Cadillac's bumpers envious and was maybe a tad rough around the edges. The seller apparently was not S&W savvy and was over-the-moon happy to get that much for it.
My gunsmith charged me $115 to restore the original brushed stainless finish and while it was completely apart for that service, he cleaned and lubricated the entire gun. I bought a set of the correct flat-bottom Magna stocks for it but I think it looks better in stocks from my collection of checkered targets.
My only problem is that I hate to shoot it and ruin that unfired appearance.
Ed
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|

08-10-2021, 11:19 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Nevada
Posts: 11,746
Likes: 19,980
Liked 28,344 Times in 7,850 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DD357
It is offered again now with the lock & a red ramp.
|
Yeah, it’s a 67 in name only. I think the latest iteration also has a two-piece barrel. Hard to beat the venerable 67.
__________________
213th FBINA
Last edited by CH4; 08-10-2021 at 11:22 PM.
|

08-11-2021, 04:40 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 13,634
Liked 5,379 Times in 1,287 Posts
|
|
Here is my 67-1 with Combat Stocks.
Last edited by Moo Moo; 08-11-2021 at 04:41 AM.
Reason: Add image
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-16-2023, 08:56 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: EU
Posts: 4
Likes: 4
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Model 67-7 version?
Hi guys, I have the opportunity to purchase this revolver, marked Model 67-7 (?), but not mentioned in history by John (Paladin85020 post). Does anyone know anything about this version? I'm also wondering if it's possible to replace the Hogue rubber grips with wooden ones for the classic look, but there is no mounting screw visible from outside. Thanks for advice.
(used pictures are from advertisement)
Last edited by Peter_G; 12-16-2023 at 03:40 PM.
|

12-16-2023, 09:37 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 452
Likes: 1,430
Liked 995 Times in 311 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_G
Hi guys, I have the opportunity to purchase this revolver, marked Model 67-7 (?), but not mentioned in history by John (Paladin85020 post). Does anyone know anything about this version? I'm also wondering if it's possible to replace the Hogue rubber grips with wooden ones for the classic look, but there is no mounting screw visible from outside. Thanks for advice.
(used pictures are from advertisement)
|
Thanks for using the search function to bring up this old thread, made for informative reading on my favorite revolver.
This is a 67-1, not a 67-7.
It has a pinned barrel. The revolver you are buying may be a different one from the one shown in these pictures.
The rubber grips on this one are attached by a screw in the butt. There is a small metal saddle that straddles the bottom pins, This saddle can be removed and wooden grips, or stocks can be attached.
This is a very nice Model 67 that I wouldn't hesitate to buy if the price was in my wheelhouse.
Last edited by Ingramite; 12-16-2023 at 09:39 AM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-16-2023, 09:44 AM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 27,657
Likes: 1,968
Liked 21,648 Times in 10,302 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_G
Hi guys, I have the opportunity to purchase this revolver, marked Model 67-7 (?), but not mentioned in history by John (Paladin85020 post). Does anyone know anything about this version? I'm also wondering if it's possible to replace the Hogue rubber grips with wooden ones for the classic look, but there is no mounting screw visible from outside. Thanks for advice.
(used pictures are from advertisement)
|
Welcome! Good information in the post just above. Just adding the 24K serial number prefix seen in the second image dates to late 1977, so is in the 67-1 time frame.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-16-2023, 09:48 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: EU
Posts: 4
Likes: 4
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Thank you both very much.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-16-2023, 02:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: delaware, usa
Posts: 274
Likes: 24
Liked 142 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
hi folks, yes a cherry would have been nice, to have the 67 in 2" or 2 1/2" stay safe.....dan
|

12-16-2023, 08:29 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 452
Likes: 1,430
Liked 995 Times in 311 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sw dan
hi folks, yes a cherry would have been nice, to have the 67 in 2" or 2 1/2" stay safe.....dan
|
I've thought that too....then I pick up mine. It's perfectly balanced and naturally pointing. I don't think a snub would or could be an improvement on the 4" barrel.
There is the semi-rare Model 67-5 L Comp with the 3" barrel and the port ahead of the front sight....interesting but....perfection is something that I don't want to mess with and my No-Dash 1st year is just about perfect.
Last edited by Ingramite; 12-16-2023 at 10:42 PM.
|

12-16-2023, 10:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 378
Likes: 912
Liked 1,000 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
I very much love my 67. I found it at a local FFL early this year. A little grimy but otherwise fine. It’s an early no dash with stainless sights. I put some early magnas on it and a Tyler T-grip.
Other than my model 17 8-3/8” it’s the revolver I’m most accurate with. Here she is with my 15-5 2”.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-17-2023, 07:35 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: EU
Posts: 4
Likes: 4
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moo Moo
Here is my 67-1 with Combat Stocks.

|
A very nice combo, the knife at least doubles the value of the gun...
|

12-17-2023, 10:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 488
Likes: 488
Liked 651 Times in 290 Posts
|
|
Model 67 history
Here is my early no dash model 67. I was looking for a model 15 at the time when this one came in at the local gun store.
The 67 really is one of the best. As much as I like blued carbon steel I have to admit that stainless has its advantages. The front sight insert was done before I bought the gun.
If I could only have one handgun this would be it.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-17-2023, 10:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 488
Likes: 488
Liked 651 Times in 290 Posts
|
|
Model 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by MG-70
Great, short, article! I'm partial to stainless, and find the 67 with the tapered barrel to be one of, if not The classiest, stainless, revolver, ever produced. I even prefer the looks of it over the more functional, or beneficial, models with an ejector rod shroud.
Thank you for posting the article!
|
As far as style goes the model 67 and 4” model 15 are among the best looking S&Ws. Here is mine next to my model 64. I have had the 64 since 1993 and the 67 since 2006. Both came from the same LGS at a decent price. When I bought the 64 it seemed like you could not give away anything that looked like a traded in police gun. When I bought the 67 things had changed at least in this market and what you could buy for $150 in the early 90s was now more like $300.
After I bought the model 67 I sent it back to S&W for an action job and a CT trigger. The gun now has the slickest DA pull that I have ever found. After I got the gun back I showed it to a retired LEO who asked me why I did’ nt go for a model 66.
My answer is the same now as it was then. The model 66 is a great gun, but the 67 is all that I really need.
Last edited by Inland7-45; 12-17-2023 at 10:43 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-17-2023, 12:22 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Chesterfield, Va.
Posts: 6,610
Likes: 9,755
Liked 14,237 Times in 3,531 Posts
|
|
I'm glad this got bumped up again too. I hadn't seen it and have enjoyed reading every post.
I got a 67-1 a few months ago. Like most of it's kind, I'm sure, it really likes 148 grain wadcutters over the standard charge of Bullseye.
It doesn't have a pinned barrel, and the S/N is a triple letter, AHYXXX, which as best I can figure is from about 1985. That -1 had a good, long run.
Still looks pretty good. I've added a BK to it, but that's about it.
It has an older sibling, a 15-2 that I like quite a bit too. Which one I like best, depends on which one I'm holding at the time.
__________________
John 3:16 .
Last edited by CajunBass; 12-17-2023 at 12:23 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-17-2023, 12:50 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 194
Likes: 1,291
Liked 673 Times in 138 Posts
|
|
[QUOTE=Inland7-45; The front sight insert was done before I bought the gun. [/QUOTE]
Are you sure the front sight insert was added?
I recently picked up model 67 # 5K97535 with stainless sights.
The front sight looks exactly like yours and appears factory.
Lots of good info in this thread, all of the dash changes mirror the model 66.
__________________
Troubles come, they will pass
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-17-2023, 01:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 488
Likes: 488
Liked 651 Times in 290 Posts
|
|
Good point regarding the front sight insert. The gun came with the original box and still has the store price tag with $175 hand written. The S&W label is still attached to the end of the box and readable.
When I get a chance I will check the label since front and rear sight options are listed.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-17-2023, 01:41 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas Gulf Coast...
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 10,885
Liked 24,707 Times in 3,492 Posts
|
|
S.S. has never been a favorite but I could
not pass this NIB 1975 vintage model 67 this past spring.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-17-2023, 01:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 488
Likes: 488
Liked 651 Times in 290 Posts
|
|
Early model 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by wcat94
Are you sure the front sight insert was added?
I recently picked up model 67 # 5K97535 with stainless sights.
The front sight looks exactly like yours and appears factory.
Lots of good info in this thread, all of the dash changes mirror the model 66.
|
Another piece of information about this gun is that it was purchased new by an auxiliary police officer who sold it back to same store in 2006. The policy may have been different from city to city but I know that some of the local jurisdictions required the auxiliaries to purchase their own weapons and there seemed to be
some leeway on what they could carry as long as it was a .38 Special. After appointment as a city police officers they were required to carry department issue weapons only while on duty.
At least that is how it was in the town where I lived at the time.
I grew up about a 20 minute drive from the S&W plant. It was an entirely different situation back then. I had several neighbors who worked there and I also worked there for about a year in the early 70s.
I also belonged to an indoor pistol league and our club as well as the other participating clubs had at least a few S&W employees.
If you knew someone who worked in the service department or in management it made things easier to have gun worked on and to be sure that their best guy worked on it.
If you lived close enough it was never a problem to bring your guns in and pick them up in person when done. They were also very helpful to law enforcement customers so the original owner of my model 67 may have had the sight done with a quick turn around.
Up until 1977 the factory was able to work on most of the very old guns. That was the year that there was a fire in the service department. At the time the service was located across from the main gate. From what I understand most of the older replacement parts were heat and water damaged and had to be scrapped. This included many parts for long action revolvers and even breaktops. I am not certain as to how accurate this information is. If the are any forum members who know the
whole story please correct me if my recollections are off.
Last edited by Inland7-45; 12-17-2023 at 02:19 PM.
Reason: Spelling, grammar
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-17-2023, 03:31 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 194
Likes: 1,291
Liked 673 Times in 138 Posts
|
|
Inland 7-45
I have no history on mine. It came to me from a shop in the east coast.
It was in need of a good cleaning but otherwise in great shape. The stocks were these poorly refinished targets.
I suppose it is possible the red inserts could have been added also. I had figured they were a change later in the first ones having the stainless sights.
Interesting write up, thanks.
__________________
Troubles come, they will pass
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-17-2023, 04:02 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 999
Likes: 6,722
Liked 2,941 Times in 633 Posts
|
|
Assorted 67's
Here are a few. Left to Right, Top to Bottom
ND, -1, -2
-3, -4
ND marked SCPD-R (Suffolk County PD I believe), ND marked CHP, -1 marked DPR (CA Dept Parks and Rec I believe)
ND marked CPD (?), ND marked OHB (Over stamp CHP)
Last edited by mchom; 12-17-2023 at 06:48 PM.
Reason: Additional thought
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-17-2023, 06:47 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 488
Likes: 488
Liked 651 Times in 290 Posts
|
|
Model 67 Collection
Quote:
Originally Posted by mchom
Here are a few. Left to Right, Top to Bottom
ND, -1, -2
-3, -4
ND marked SCPD-R (Suffolk County PD I believe), ND marked CHP, -1 marked DPR (Dept Parks and Rec I believe)
ND marked CPD (Chicago ?), ND marked OHB (Over stamp CHP)

|
That is a nice collection of 67s. My newest firearm is a model 64 made in 1979 or 80. As a rule my interest ends with the last of the pinned barreled guns.
The exceptions would be .32 caliber J frames especially the short run stainless and adjustable sight versions, Model 24-3 , Model 16-4 and the model 67. Especially law enforcement marked guns.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-22-2023, 01:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: EU
Posts: 4
Likes: 4
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_G
Hi guys, I have the opportunity to purchase this revolver, marked Model 67-7 (?), but not mentioned in history by John (Paladin85020 post)...
|
I've got it!
... and a comparison with the .32 grandfather from 1887...
SA trigger weight feels incredibly light, much ligher than my 2011 3.0 lbs (1.36kg) trigger, so I decided to check it ... 0.846kg (1.87 lbs)! Is that OK?
Last edited by Peter_G; 12-22-2023 at 06:11 PM.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|