|
 |

09-29-2020, 09:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 10
Likes: 1
Liked 9 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
History of this Model 19-3 .357 Revolver
Looking for the history, if any, of my SW Model 19-3, .357 Magnum. Serial number K890214. Purchased around 1985 from a fellow USAF Fighter pilot in my squadron for $150. I will attach several pics. Interested in date of manufacture and any history if that info is available. I suspect it was a former state trooper's issued weapon at some time. It has a 4 inch barrel.
Thanks in advance for any help, assistance or opinions. No, it's not for sale, but curious what any of you think it is worth. I will probably pass it on to one of my descendants.
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|

09-29-2020, 09:36 PM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 958
Likes: 492
Liked 2,171 Times in 520 Posts
|
|
$800 -$900
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

09-29-2020, 09:49 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: the ready line, N. Idaho
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 1,146
Liked 2,027 Times in 877 Posts
|
|
Nice desirable piece of history, handled well and fed the right vitamins to see a long life.
__________________
"Don't Give Up the Ship"
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

09-29-2020, 10:24 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 11,516
Liked 2,294 Times in 845 Posts
|
|
If it’s a former LE service revolver it sure doesn’t have much holster wear.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

09-29-2020, 10:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 2,459
Liked 2,051 Times in 797 Posts
|
|
According to the SCSW book, p489, K848782-K946391 corresponds to 1969. K890214 is in the middle of that range.
Model number 19-3 started in 1967, and had diamond center grips until sometime in 1968, so that fits. Some guns were stamped with the name of the law enforcement agency or police department that issued them. (There are two pages of those references in the book) If you find a stamp of initials like that, someone may be able to tell you more.
Or pay for a "letter" that would tell you exactly when and to what agency the gun was sold.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

09-30-2020, 09:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 10
Likes: 1
Liked 9 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
19-3
Pete thanks so much for this info!!!!
|

09-30-2020, 09:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 10
Likes: 1
Liked 9 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
19-3
Hey Pete one question......you said diamond center grips discontinued in 1968, but what do you call the grips on my handgun?? Those are not diamond center??? Little confused......thanks again!!
|

09-30-2020, 09:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 160
Likes: 67
Liked 230 Times in 89 Posts
|
|
It is most likely NOT a former police weapon.
That was my profession for decades, and I can tell you this.....
I have NEVER seen a police weapon with a target hammer and target trigger.
The triggers in particular are lousy for double action shooting.
Now, I am sure someone will come along and question my sanity but if the existed at all, they were rare in police work.
Police revolver shooting was mostly centered on double action fire.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

09-30-2020, 09:44 PM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 958
Likes: 492
Liked 2,171 Times in 520 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziphead65
Hey Pete one question......you said diamond center grips discontinued in 1968, but what do you call the grips on my handgun?? Those are not diamond center??? Little confused......thanks again!!
|
Not Pete, but your grips are called football targets
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
|

09-30-2020, 10:01 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tincup, CO
Posts: 3,799
Likes: 6,427
Liked 7,778 Times in 2,368 Posts
|
|
That's a very nice M 19. Your football target stocks are likely original, since the diamond center was discontinued about 1968. Your dash 3 has recessed charge holes in the cylinder and a pinned barrel, considered a plus for collectors. Newer guns have neither. The M 19 was developed on the slightly smaller and lighter K frame than the heavier N frame M 27 & 28. Many people will say to shoot primarily .38's with occasional magnums, and to stay away from the hot 125 grain jacketed magnums. There are reports of cracked frames from that combination. You should be able to shoot all the 158 grain bullets your hands and wallet can survive. This is not a universal opinion and is endlessly debated here. It was originally named the Combat Magnum before model numbers were assigned about 1958. Still carries that designation, but the model number is most frequently used. Looks like it needs some exercise, which won't hurt value if care is taken.
__________________
Some collect art; I shoot it!
|

09-30-2020, 10:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,464
Likes: 471
Liked 5,956 Times in 1,849 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by banger
It is most likely NOT a former police weapon.
That was my profession for decades, and I can tell you this.....
I have NEVER seen a police weapon with a target hammer and target trigger.
The triggers in particular are lousy for double action shooting.
Now, I am sure someone will come along and question my sanity but if the existed at all, they were rare in police work.
Police revolver shooting was mostly centered on double action fire.
|
I would never question your sanity (glass houses, you know), but I did encounter some and actually carried a 2" Colt Lawman MK III that came from the factory with a target hammer and smooth trigger. It shredded sport coat linings something awful. One of my colleagues carried his bull barreled pin gun on duty. It was a S&W in an approved caliber and barrel length, after all. Those grooved triggers were less than ideal for DA work, though.
I would concur that it is not ex-LEO on the basis of condition. Virtually no holster wear on a gun carried daily? I doubt it.
__________________
I need ammo, not a ride.
Last edited by Buford57; 09-30-2020 at 10:14 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

09-30-2020, 10:19 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,718
Likes: 5,394
Liked 21,153 Times in 7,507 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziphead65
you said diamond center grips discontinued in 1968, but what do you call the grips on my handgun?? Those are not diamond center??? Little confused
|
I suspect you are confusing "diamond" with the checking. Yes, the effect of checking is to create tiny diamond shaped points within the checking border. But that isn't "diamond stocks." The latter term refers to stocks that have a smooth diamond shape in the middle of the checked pattern, around the screw hole. I have observed newcomers to S&W make this mistake before. It is just a matter of learning to understand the terminology.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|

09-30-2020, 10:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 160
Likes: 67
Liked 230 Times in 89 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buford57
I would never question your sanity (glass houses, you know), but I did encounter some and actually carried a 2" Colt Lawman MK III that came from the factory with a target hammer and smooth trigger. It shredded sport coat linings something awful. One of my colleagues carried his bull barreled pin gun on duty. It was a S&W in an approved caliber and barrel length, after all. Those grooved triggers were less than ideal for DA work, though.
I would concur that it is not ex-LEO on the basis of condition. Virtually no holster wear on a gun carried daily? I doubt it.
|
I suppose I could have been more articulate.
I should have said that I have never seen a department issued revolver with the target hammer and target trigger.
Personal carry, anything went.
I actually knew a guy who used a Luger off duty.
BUT, he was kind of a flashy guy.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

09-30-2020, 11:36 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 2,459
Liked 2,051 Times in 797 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK
...stocks that have a smooth diamond shape in the middle of the checked pattern, around the screw hole...
|
That was what I meant, yes.
Can't comment on the trigger and its use in law enforcement, but currently the wider target trigger and target hammer are worth a premium when found on some guns. Grips are easily swapped, hammers and triggers, not so much, so those are probably original.
Nice looking gun, in any case. I would be happy to own it.
|

10-01-2020, 06:31 AM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: western NC
Posts: 3,538
Likes: 2,974
Liked 7,965 Times in 2,518 Posts
|
|
Beautiful revolver, I, too have a M19-3 a few years newer than yours (1973-74). You may hear the term "3-T" referring to how your revolver is equipped: Target hammer, Target trigger, Target stocks. Very desirable combo. I've never seen one of these crack the forcing cone on a long diet of 125 grain magnum loads, but I suppose it might happen. Mine is my second M19, the first one was a dash 2 with a 6" barrel. In both guns, my preferred load is 125 grain JHP magnums, never had any issue. I also had a M66-1 (the stainless steel version of the M19) for a long time, and shot 125 grain magnums from it as well with no issues. You tend to get a bit less felt recoil with those loads (lighter bullet) and a great deal more velocity. The ballistics say they have more energy out to 25 yards than the 158 grain loads. I pretty much keep my loads in this gun limited to .38Spl +P now, I have a N frame .357 that I feed the heavy stuff.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

10-01-2020, 06:57 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North Coast of America
Posts: 525
Likes: 1,900
Liked 2,060 Times in 307 Posts
|
|
Not to question your eyesight (but maybe my own), the O.P. revolver has a Combat (semi-target .375) hammer and narrow (.265) service trigger. Most service revolvers that I recall in the 70's & 80's were in this configuration. Fixed-sight (10's, 13's, ect) had narrow service hammer & trigger. Later on the smooth Combat trigger (.312) became prevalent.
My personal preference is the .375 hammer with smooth .312 trigger. I found this best for both DA/SA work. Your mileage may vary though.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

10-01-2020, 07:09 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 579
Likes: 1,129
Liked 499 Times in 293 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziphead65
...I will probably pass it on to one of my descendants.
|
That's a beautiful M19. Your biggest decision will be which ONE of your descendants would receive such a fantastic endowment.
|

10-01-2020, 06:32 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Occupied California
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 1,542
Liked 5,663 Times in 1,638 Posts
|
|
My Model 19-3 shipped in May 1972. I have the original box which confirms that it was shipped with the Service Trigger, Semi-Target Hammer and Target Stocks, but has the plain black Baughman ramp front sight and plain rear sight blade.
I guess someone wanted more hand filling stocks than the standard Magnas but didn't care for a full 3T/RRWO configuration.
Last edited by Walter Rego; 10-01-2020 at 06:39 PM.
|

10-01-2020, 08:19 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: western NC
Posts: 3,538
Likes: 2,974
Liked 7,965 Times in 2,518 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHARLIE699
Not to question your eyesight
|
Go ahead, I question it all the time.  Bifocals can be fun that way.
I thought the OP had said that's what he had, my mistake. My M19-3 is a 3T, I have the original box.
Quote:
Later on the smooth Combat trigger (.312) became prevalent.
My personal preference is the .375 hammer with smooth .312 trigger. I found this best for both DA/SA work. Your mileage may vary though.
|
My M28-2 is equipped with the smooth trigger and "3/4" target hammer. I really have no preference of hammer, between the target and .375 version, but I absolutely LOVE the smooth trigger, my favorite of all my revolvers, which have the wide target version.
|

10-01-2020, 09:08 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 11,516
Liked 2,294 Times in 845 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by banger
It is most likely NOT a former police weapon.
That was my profession for decades, and I can tell you this.....
I have NEVER seen a police weapon with a target hammer and target trigger.
The triggers in particular are lousy for double action shooting.
Now, I am sure someone will come along and question my sanity but if the existed at all, they were rare in police work.
Police revolver shooting was mostly centered on double action fire.
|
+1. The trigger on my issued 28-2 (6” bbl) is just about the worst of all my S&W revolvers. I got used to it though, shot Master with it in the Academy (when they made us shoot with our gas masks on, no less). I never saw a target trigger, smooth trigger, or target hammer on an issued Model 28.
When we were given the opportunity to carry our personal revolvers, I carried my 19-4 (4” bbl w/ smooth trigger) for a few months but I could never warm up to it so I went back to my issued Highway Patrolman.
BTW, to this day I fire my S&W revolvers double action (& I CCW my Centennials).
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

10-01-2020, 11:49 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 18,279
Likes: 101,376
Liked 27,144 Times in 9,219 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by S-W4EVER
+1. The trigger on my issued 28-2 (6” bbl) is just about the worst of all my S&W revolvers. I got used to it though, shot Master with it in the Academy (when they made us shoot with our gas masks on, no less). I never saw a target trigger, smooth trigger, or target hammer on an issued Model 28.
When we were given the opportunity to carry our personal revolvers, I carried my 19-4 (4” bbl w/ smooth trigger) for a few months but I could never warm up to it so I went back to my issued Highway Patrolman.
BTW, to this day I fire my S&W revolvers double action (& I CCW my Centennials).
|
The New York State Police issued M28s with the smooth .312" Ranger trigger.
"I guess someone wanted more hand filling stocks than the standard Magnas but didn't care for a full 3T/RRWO configuration."
Target grips were standard on the .357 Combat Magnum (Model 19).
When I started in law enforcement in 1976, for some reason a lot of my fellow deputies and police officers wanted target hammers and grooved target triggers on their revolvers. Parts were easy to find and not that expensive, so I swapped out a lot. I personally prefer the smooth .312" Ranger trigger, with the sides contoured, mated to a target hammer. I set up many of my duty revolvers that way.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
Last edited by Muley Gil; 10-01-2020 at 11:57 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

10-02-2020, 01:02 AM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 11,516
Liked 2,294 Times in 845 Posts
|
|
One thing I’ve learned, anything is possible when it comes to S&W revolvers.
|

10-03-2020, 03:56 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 8,060
Likes: 2,876
Liked 9,165 Times in 3,276 Posts
|
|
A few observations,
First, your 19-3 would have the older style front site ramp base that is cross pinned to the barrel, around late 69 early 70 the fs ramp becomes integral with the barrel.
Second although the stocks are correct style non diamond center they are walnut and IIRC the four and six inch 19-3's of that era came standard with Goncalo Alves ( sometimes Rosewood) so were likely swapped or replaced.
As for LE handguns not having a wide tt/th that is not a hard rule, many depts had an acceptable model list and left the purchase up to the individual officer.
On a final note I have never seen a 19-3 that came with diamond target stocks.
Early stocks on 19-3's are unique in that they have the older style deep SS Escutcheons where by 1970 it had changed to shallow brass escutcheons.
Last edited by Engine49guy; 10-03-2020 at 04:02 PM.
|

10-05-2020, 08:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 10
Likes: 1
Liked 9 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
19-3
Thanks to everyone who has commented here.....I learned that I really didn't know much about this handgun that I have owned for about 35 years!!!
I have no idea what kind of trigger or hammer is on the gun, I'm sure some of you could tell if I posted better pics; maybe I will do that.
But I'm really grateful for anyone who took the time to comment!!!
Thanks again, it was good to finally confirm the manufacture date.
|

10-30-2021, 03:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Smith & Wesson 357 revolver 19-3
I have come across this S&W 19-3, .357 and have some ideas but need help valuing this pistol. Has adjustable rear sight, also the trigger is of match quality/pull [light & short]. box says April 15,1955,, sn# 2K66828.
If more is needed please ask.
Thanks Tad
|

10-30-2021, 05:13 PM
|
 |
SWCA Chairman
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 1,413
Liked 33,504 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
|
2K66828 most likely shipped from S&W in 1972. It has a target hammer and trigger and target stocks made of Goncalo alves. I think the bright blue finish is in great shape, but needs cleaning to know for certain. I would value the revolver and box at approximately $900.
Bill
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

10-30-2021, 05:54 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,718
Likes: 5,394
Liked 21,153 Times in 7,507 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTADW2@GMAIL
box says April 15,1955
|
Tad
That is the date of the adoption of the liability & warranty statement printed on the inside of the box. It has nothing whatever to do with the date of the handgun itself.
Those two statements and the date remained in the boxes well into the Bangor Punta era - I have boxes from the mid-1970s that still have the April 15, 1955, date.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

07-07-2022, 02:39 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 11
Likes: 27
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
19-3
My 19-3 from the mid-70s. Dad bought it for me when I was a senior in high school with my hard earned money. I recently got it back in my possession after having been stored by my Dad since I joined the Army in 76. Serial # 7K757--.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

07-09-2022, 06:27 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: HEART of TEXAS
Posts: 637
Likes: 676
Liked 1,134 Times in 355 Posts
|
|
Beautiful revolver, looks unused.
I would pay $900.
__________________
V/r,
Markham
|

07-09-2022, 06:52 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,439
Likes: 15,455
Liked 11,103 Times in 2,077 Posts
|
|
2nd Engine 49 guy's comment, many departments required Officers to purchase their own sidearm years ago. Not so much SP/HP departments.
__________________
LEX ET ORDO
|

07-09-2022, 07:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Southern FL, East side.
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 2,630
Liked 3,353 Times in 1,404 Posts
|
|
The OP has a very nice gun. However, if that was ever owned by a LE agency it never got issued. Whoever owned it it was never a duty weapon. I'd like to have it. All of my old duty weapons are all beat up.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

07-09-2022, 09:34 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,667
Likes: 1,781
Liked 17,788 Times in 4,639 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by banger
It is most likely NOT a former police weapon.
That was my profession for decades, and I can tell you this.....
I have NEVER seen a police weapon with a target hammer and target trigger.
The triggers in particular are lousy for double action shooting.
Now, I am sure someone will come along and question my sanity but if the existed at all, they were rare in police work.
Police revolver shooting was mostly centered on double action fire.
|
In that era, in my part of the world, double action range fire was at 3 and 7 yards. Also officer required to furnish their own service revolver might have purchase what was available. Model 19s were difficult to find.
|

07-10-2022, 07:25 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 3,937
Liked 2,464 Times in 884 Posts
|
|
Around here, both 19s shown in this thread would go for north of $1,000. I see no wear on either, and if that’s actually the case I’d say $1,250ish.
|

07-10-2022, 01:38 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: N. Iowa
Posts: 294
Likes: 7,898
Liked 372 Times in 154 Posts
|
|
As to the target triggers and hammers: The USAF issued model 15 revolvers with target hammers and triggers exclusively.
__________________
ask questions- then shoot!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|