|
 |

07-20-2011, 10:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
686 vs. 686 ssr?
Hello, I am new to the forum and am looking to purchase a 4" 357 mag. I have decided that I'm either going with the 686 or the 686 ssr. I was wondering if anyone could give me any info on what the pros and cons are of each if there are any. As far as looks go, I like them both so that's not really an issue. Is one more durable than the other? Is the trigger pull on the ssr a whole lot better than the 686? It's about a hundred dollar difference so I'm trying to figure out if it's worth the extra hundred. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank You in advance
|

07-21-2011, 06:21 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portsmouth, VA.
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Liked 80 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
I have both and there are a few advantages to the SSR such as the ability to change front sight with ez and the hammer and trigger are not mim parts. But if it were me I like the 686+ because of the extra round. I only use ny SSR for IDPA and I have 4 686+s Either way you go you will have a fine firearm.
__________________
May God Bless The USA
|

07-21-2011, 07:52 AM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,520
Likes: 249
Liked 2,437 Times in 1,102 Posts
|
|
Also, look at the 627 Pro. About the same price as the SSR. It carries 8 rounds, and to me is better balanced than the 686.
|

07-21-2011, 11:42 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
You can't go wrong with either model. I shoot a 686 and a 686 SSR. Honestly, I really love the SSR. The lighter barrel really makes a difference when transitioning from target to target. Before I bought the SSR, I would not have thought the narrow barrel profile would make that much difference. However, for me, it does. The gun is also put together very well. I have a 686-3 that Jack Weigand worked on and I will still reach for the SSR most of the time when going to the range.
|

07-21-2011, 01:04 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pinson, AL
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 57
Liked 656 Times in 307 Posts
|
|
5/08 found me at my local pusher - to buy a 686SSR. I left with a then new arrival - the 627 Pro, SKU #178014 - wow, am I glad! Moonclip ready - springloaded front sight - decent trigger - great looks/balance - same $ as the 686SSR, too.
Stainz
|

07-21-2011, 01:20 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 934
Likes: 27
Liked 308 Times in 111 Posts
|
|
We had a discussion about this in another thread quite recently. Both guns are excellent, well made, accurate, durable, all that. I think most "standard" 686s these days are the 7-shot models, whereas the SSR is a six-gun. If you think you might want to use the gun for IDPA or IPSC matches you are restricted by the rules to a six shooter. Any of the new 7 or 8 shooters are, for all practical purposes, verbotten. If you are not interested in IDPA or IPSC, then it really makes little difference and depends entirely on your preferences, cosmetics, cost, etc.
|

07-21-2011, 01:25 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: washington illinois
Posts: 3,493
Likes: 9,209
Liked 2,712 Times in 1,039 Posts
|
|
i suggest the 686 its a fine revolver in fact its on my list of favorite s&w revolvers.
|

07-21-2011, 01:45 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 3,543
Liked 4,000 Times in 1,628 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mg357
i suggest the 686 its a fine revolver in fact its on my list of favorite s&w revolvers.
|
I gotta agree, mg357. I have a 2 1/2" no dash 686, that I had fitted with a 7 shot cylinder when I sent it to S&W for the mod. It shoots one ragged hole groups off the bench, and is one of my favorite handguns.....
__________________
'Nam 1968-69.DAV,VFW,NRA Inst.
|

07-21-2011, 01:49 PM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 738
Liked 1,216 Times in 743 Posts
|
|
and welcome to the forum!
__________________
SWCA#2208
KK4EMO
|

07-21-2011, 02:03 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 321
Likes: 72
Liked 36 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by epj
Also, look at the 627 Pro. About the same price as the SSR. It carries 8 rounds, and to me is better balanced than the 686.

|
I agree with this.
I think if I were set on a 686, I'd get the 7 rounder unless I was going to shoot in more competitions penalizes anything above 6 rounds. Then I'd go with the SSR.
|

07-21-2011, 02:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Seven and 8 shot revolvers are allowed in IDPA but may be loaded only with 6 rounds.
"D. Be loaded to the division capacity of six (6) rounds in the
cylinder. Seven (7) and eight (8) shot revolvers are permitted,
but may only load six (6) rounds."
http://www.idpa.com/Documents/IDPARuleBook2005.pdf
I have an SSR for IDPA but am at a disadvantage in Steel Matches if I miss twice.
I know. "Don't miss twice; it's cheaper than adding a 627."
Last edited by RichardC; 07-21-2011 at 02:48 PM.
|

07-21-2011, 04:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Florence, Ky
Posts: 116
Likes: 11
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardC
Seven and 8 shot revolvers are allowed in IDPA but may be loaded only with 6 rounds.
"D. Be loaded to the division capacity of six (6) rounds in the
cylinder. Seven (7) and eight (8) shot revolvers are permitted,
but may only load six (6) rounds."
http://www.idpa.com/Documents/IDPARuleBook2005.pdf
I have an SSR for IDPA but am at a disadvantage in Steel Matches if I miss twice.
I know. "Don't miss twice; it's cheaper than adding a 627." 
|
But even if you "down load" the 627 it's still not permitted because of the 5" barrel, right?
|

07-21-2011, 04:39 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,520
Likes: 249
Liked 2,437 Times in 1,102 Posts
|
|
The 627 Pro has a 4-1/8" barrel. Actually, I think the barrel is only 4", 'cause the crown is recessed about 1/8". However, I think they catalog it at 4.125.
|

07-21-2011, 05:03 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 934
Likes: 27
Liked 308 Times in 111 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ursoboostd
But even if you "down load" the 627 it's still not permitted because of the 5" barrel, right?
|
Right. And try speed reloads with 7 or 8 shot speed-loaders downloaded sometime for kicks. Quite simply put, if you're going to shoot IPSC or IDPA with a revolver, don't mess with it, get the SSR. If you want to also shoot steel, bowling pins, ICORE, etc., maybe you ought to spring for two guns!! It's still less expensive than golf!!
|

07-21-2011, 08:39 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pinson, AL
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 57
Liked 656 Times in 307 Posts
|
|
I love my 2 5/8" PC627 UDR's and 4" 627 Pro. They were preceded by my "'04 Stocking Dealer Exclusive", a 5" half lug 686+ with Ahrends cocobolo square conversion finger grooved stocks, an orange HiViz front sight, and a V-notch rear sight. Oddly, I bought it new for $10 less than a new 4" full-lug 686+ (both 7-shooters). Great SPC revolver - then they went on a SPC hiatus at the range for a couple of years. Fun plinker - great pointer. Sadly, the 627 Pro made it collect cobwebs... and the PC627 UDR almost did the same to the 627 Pro - phases, I suppose.
I need to dig deep in the safe and take that great plinker to the range. Those evil 627's!
Stainz
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|