|
|
08-17-2011, 11:45 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Larger caliber L-Frame?
Did Smith ever make an L-Frame in a caliber larger than 38/357?
|
08-17-2011, 11:50 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Littleton, Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 4,425
Liked 1,060 Times in 510 Posts
|
|
Yes, in .40 S&W. I forget the number. Had a titanium cylinder, I think. Only saw one and couldn't get the clerk to show it to me. If he didn't care about the sale, neither did I.
__________________
and what his trumpet saith
|
08-17-2011, 11:51 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: WV
Posts: 778
Likes: 161
Liked 541 Times in 259 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H.Callahan
Did Smith ever make an L-Frame in a caliber larger than 38/357?
|
I don't think, but I coudl be wrong.
Wouldn't it be sweet if they could squeeze six 10mm's in a 3" L-frame package.
|
08-17-2011, 11:53 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Check out a 696 in .44 Special or a 296, same caliber.
|
08-17-2011, 12:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,166
Likes: 3,647
Liked 5,216 Times in 2,177 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. W.
I don't think, but I coudl be wrong.
|
The L frame in .40S&W is called the Model 646. I have one. It was dropped due to slow sales.
__________________
Science plus Art
|
08-17-2011, 12:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Port Bolivar, Tx
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 72
Liked 1,004 Times in 259 Posts
|
|
646 in 40 caliber with a titanium cylinder and a 696 44 special with a 5 shot cylinder. Both great guns, but werent real big sellers during their time.
|
08-17-2011, 12:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 331
Likes: 14
Liked 25 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Custom 'smiths can make a standard six shot L frame .357 into a .41 Special.
__________________
Stu
|
08-17-2011, 12:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 977
Likes: 1,662
Liked 1,762 Times in 504 Posts
|
|
610 & 310 in 10mm.
|
08-17-2011, 12:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,166
Likes: 3,647
Liked 5,216 Times in 2,177 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdogs
610 & 310 in 10mm.
|
N frames, not L frames
__________________
Science plus Art
|
08-17-2011, 09:12 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
A 696 would be perfect. I assume they are pretty rare?
|
08-17-2011, 09:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Port Bolivar, Tx
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 72
Liked 1,004 Times in 259 Posts
|
|
While they r not extremely rare, they are very desired and people tend to not let them go. Look up the 396. It's a lightweight variant of the 696
|
08-17-2011, 09:55 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jonesboro, GA
Posts: 2,198
Likes: 1,769
Liked 1,581 Times in 447 Posts
|
|
How about a .44 special on a L frame? The 296ti, mentioned earlier is on a alloy L frame. I like mine. Came with Uncle Mike's on it, but I changed those to some Ahrends. Even alloy frames need wood!
|
08-18-2011, 03:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Greenwood, IN USA
Posts: 446
Likes: 18
Liked 67 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Smith made a couple versions in .44 Special and .40 S&W. None were big sellers despite all the calls for them, similar to those who want a .41 cal. There is just no market for them.
|
08-18-2011, 09:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Upstate, S.C.
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 78
Liked 220 Times in 133 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H.Callahan
A 696 would be perfect. I assume they are pretty rare?
|
Rare? I'm not sure I would call it rare, just not real common. The 696 is on my list of "always on the look out". I actually think I have a line on one, but it require me to be a real @#^% to get it.
Last edited by palmetto99; 08-18-2011 at 09:44 PM.
|
08-18-2011, 09:57 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SE Mich - O/S Detroit
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 2,026
Liked 2,801 Times in 1,017 Posts
|
|
Model 696's are not...
|
08-18-2011, 10:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,537
Likes: 882
Liked 1,719 Times in 549 Posts
|
|
My gun smith and I were trading e-mails about the L-frames, discussing a possible customizing job I may give him. As part of one of his replies he made the statement that if Smith had made a "691"...i.e. a M&P style, 5 shot 44 Special on the L-frame with the same 3" barrel and round butt but with fixed sights...they would have sold a lot more of them.
I'm inclined to agree with him and wonder what the folks here think of the idea?
Dave
__________________
RSVN '69-'71
PCSD (Ret)
|
08-19-2011, 11:28 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SE Mich - O/S Detroit
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 2,026
Liked 2,801 Times in 1,017 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave T
My gun smith and I were trading e-mails about the L-frames, discussing a possible customizing job I may give him. As part of one of his replies he made the statement that if Smith had made a "691"...i.e. a M&P style, 5 shot 44 Special on the L-frame with the same 3" barrel and round butt but with fixed sights...they would have sold a lot more of them.
I'm inclined to agree with him and wonder what the folks here think of the idea?
Dave
|
Agreed. I love my 696, and wouldn't think of parting with it. That said, I love the Model 65; completely utilitarian. I just bought one, and it's an ideal revolver.
Just look at the Night Guard Series. All fixed sights, round butts, lightweight frames; just what you need for carry. However, I noticed that S&W doesn't catalogue the Model 296 any longer. So, marketing data may well show that the large-caliber, fixed-sight revolvers in .44 Special may not be that popular.
Let's face it. As a defensive handgun, it's highly unlikely that you would use the piece outside of ten yards. So why adjustable sights?
|
08-19-2011, 11:34 AM
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: upstate SC / Mtns SW Va
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 3,064
Liked 9,885 Times in 1,986 Posts
|
|
I would trade my 696 for a fixed sight model in a heart beat. Dehorn the hammer .... sweet.
Charlie
|
08-19-2011, 12:14 PM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 739
Liked 3,278 Times in 1,283 Posts
|
|
One of the posters here on the site used a fixed sight Model 681 and a barrel and cylinder from a Model 696 to put together a fixed sight .44 Special L frame. It turned out very nicely judging from the photos he posted.
|
08-20-2011, 02:58 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,834
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,243 Times in 2,483 Posts
|
|
You can easily have a fixed sighted 696.
In some of their promotial materials for the Night Guard series S&W points out that the fixed sights they use interchange with adjustable sights. You'd just have to buy a Night Guard sight for your 696.
Since the fixed sighted 296 "Centennial" and 296 Night Guards both wouldn't sell, I doubt that a fixed sighted 696 would either. I've seen S&W's .44 special sales numbers compared to .38s and .357s for the first half of the twentieth century and the whole century. In the larger picture, .44 specials never were more than a smidgen of S&W's sales. That is in large part what makes them fun for collectors to talk about. Don't take this as a condemnation of .44 specials. I won't be selling mine. I do however think .44 specials mostly appeal to collectors and reloaders, and even though some of us CCW our .44 specials, .44 specials don't make up a significant portion CCW handgun sales.
|
08-20-2011, 07:32 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 1,311
Liked 2,488 Times in 716 Posts
|
|
There is also a model 396!!
|
|
Tags
|
610, 681, 696, ahrends, ccw, centennial, l frame, model 65, model 681, round butt, titanium |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|