Marshal Tom
Member
I have a 7 shot .357 Mtn Gun without the lock and love it. It has the tapered barrel and is an L frame so it will take the punishment of steady .357 ammo etc.
Tom
Tom
Gotta agree with scooter (gettin' to be a habit), a glance at the catalog tells the story. I have a 686+ Mountain Gun that I love. When I picked up a 2 1/2'' no dash, I sent it in to S&W for the firing pin bushing mod. While it was there, I had a 7 shot cylinder installed. It's a great carry weapon. The cylinder notches on a 6 shot are over the chambers. The notches on a 7 shooter are between the chambers. That may matter to reloaders who like to make flamethrowers outta their revolvers. I would never own a 6 shot 686, as I don't compete in a discipline that outlaws a 7 shooter. The 7 shooters are just too sweet.......I think a look and S&W's catalog will reveal your answer. In the past year most of the 6 shot 686's have been dropped from production and the 686 + has become the new "standard". They didn't do that because it's less expensive to build the 7 shooter, they did it because the 6 shot 686 just isn't very popular anymore. What is left in the 6 shot version is the 686SSR and IIRC a 4 inch 686. As for why those remain, it's simply because IDPA only permits 6 rounds loaded in either SSR or ESR and indexing a 7 shooter during a reload costs time.
They're called revolvers not 6-shooters
If she fires .38s out of it, the recoil be will like shooting a .22Once the fiance and me tie the knot I think I'm going to pick up a 3" 686+ as a house gun for her. She's quite recoil shy, but she very much enjoys my dad's 4" 686 and handles it very well.
Ok, ok, sure it can be "her gun", but depending on policy of my next department it may just become and off duty gun. Even in today's world, IMO a 7 shot .357 is as viable of defensive tool as a Glock 36 or sub-compact 1911.
If she fires .38s out of it, the recoil be will like shooting a .22![]()