Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-01-2012, 01:38 PM
southchatham southchatham is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Liked 117 Times in 57 Posts
Default Chasing the pocket auto

I've returned to the 642 for my pocket ccw needs. Why do I keep chasing the small pocket auto's. My latest was the LC9 which I bought and sold within a month. I think I've finally learned that the snubnose revolver is the perfect pocket gun. Simple and boringly reliable. No more extra magazines to buy, ammo to test, ftf's to figure out why etc.

Any one else keep chasing the pocket auto only to return to ol' reliable.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 03-01-2012, 02:14 PM
DDDWho DDDWho is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Mo./Tx.
Posts: 138
Likes: 11
Liked 51 Times in 24 Posts
Default

I'm sure there is autos in existence that have thousands of rounds through them without a single FTF. If, in a must work situation the rare FTF occurs you have to do something. You must take your eyes off of the target and look at the gun. Is it a stovepipe, fail to feed or a bad cartridge?. Then take action to correct the problem.

With a revolver you only need to pull the trigger again.

I favor revolvers for several reasons. As you say "simply and boringly reliable". I did a lot of reading before I settled on a light weight 5 shot .38 Spl. A mid sized fully loaded auto weighs nearly twice what my revolver does. I have a couple of speed loaders in case I ever change my mind and start packing.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 03-01-2012, 02:15 PM
rd97 rd97 is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 117
Likes: 39
Liked 70 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Guilty of the same malady. Can't beat a J-frame for pocket carry. Still have a PM9 however but rarely carry it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-01-2012, 02:21 PM
allglock allglock is offline
Banned
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Se. Pa.
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 67
Liked 81 Times in 50 Posts
Default

There is NOTHING, like the J-Frame for pocket carry!... NOTHING! God Bless the J-Frame!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:25 PM
Rivers2k's Avatar
Rivers2k Rivers2k is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 119
Likes: 3
Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
Default

I dont think anything will replace my 442 as a pocket carry. Tried the PPK once boy was that a mistake I think i will just enjoy those in the Bond movies.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:34 PM
getoff getoff is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: FL Panhandle these days
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 941
Liked 526 Times in 270 Posts
Default

mines a 442 also. i do have an lcp and the diamondback db9. both great little guns. am i a trained professional with limitless ammo and range time at my disposal? no. if i was i would consider either of the little autos good. am i proficient with my 442, yes. so it wins the arms race. trust it to go bang, if it does not, pull the trigger until it does. +p ammo is powerful enough to get the job done.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:43 PM
M29since14 M29since14 is offline
SWCA Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,980
Likes: 10,187
Liked 10,182 Times in 4,826 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by southchatham View Post
Any one else keep chasing the pocket auto only to return to ol' reliable.
I alternate between a Chief of some kind and a PM9/CM9. In the hottest weather, sometimes even resort to a plastic mini-.380.

I prefer the Chief, but I am bit leery of reloading in a stressful situation. The auto would be a lot more positive, for me. I also realize the chance of needing to reload is likely very small.

In general, I like the guns mentioned about equally. The .380 is a considerable step below the other two, in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2012, 05:04 PM
UDR2's Avatar
UDR2 UDR2 is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 117
Likes: 9
Liked 30 Times in 22 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DDDWho View Post
I'm sure there is autos in existence that have thousands of rounds through them without a single FTF. If, in a must work situation the rare FTF occurs you have to do something. You must take your eyes off of the target and look at the gun. Is it a stovepipe, fail to feed or a bad cartridge?. Then take action to correct the problem.

With a revolver you only need to pull the trigger again....
Usually. But I have to tell you what happened to a J-frame S&W redolver that I once owned - and have long since sold: It was an all steel J-frame (I forget which model) . I got off one shot at the range and the cylinder jammed. (It had nothing to do with the internal lock - which had been totally removed.) I could not get the cylinder to turn for love or money. My local gunsmith was able to correct the problem in less than a minute, but had that happened in a defensive situation, I would have been screwed.

With a semi auto, a FFT or a FFE can be cleared up in seconds... if you know what to do and practice the routine.

I do not mean to cast aspersions, but in my opinion only, anyone who carries a cheap pocket auto and/or anyone who carries any pocket auto and fails to practice the "tap... rack... BANG!" routine is simply asking for trouble.

I carry a Kahr P380 in my pocket. It weighs 10 ounces (empty); holds a total of 7 rounds, and conceals in my pocket MUCH better than any J-frame ever could. But I am thin. My buddy, who is rather chunky (to be kind) ALWAYS carries a S&W 340PD in his pocket and you'd never know it.

So... here are some reasons to carry a QUALITY semi-auto as a pocket gun:
1. light weight
2. easy to conceal - even in a front pocket when wearing jeans
3. Two extra rounds (which is important for the "spray and pray crowd."

When it comes right down to it, the best gun to carry is the one that makes you feel good about carrying it. If you have to justify your reasons for carrying it, you are carrying the wrong gun.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 03-01-2012, 05:06 PM
Jeff45 Jeff45 is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 141
Likes: 4
Liked 21 Times in 14 Posts
Default

The advantages of the CC auto over the revolver have been discussed on about every gun forum in debth, and I also have a PM9 which is probably the best of the bunch, but all it took was one misfire with a certain type of ammo and I am back to the old reliable J frame. 100% confidence is a must.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2012, 05:28 PM
KarmannGhia KarmannGhia is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South of Atlanta, GA
Posts: 374
Likes: 268
Liked 463 Times in 168 Posts
Default

I like my LCP, but I love my 642(and 649). Those five 158gr SWCHPs give me a warm and fuzzy that the heaviest 380 can't do.

The question is: What is more important to YOU?

The weight and bulk of your carry gun, or the weight and bulk of the bullet you may have to send toward some *** that wants to harm you or your family.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-01-2012, 06:19 PM
TNFrank's Avatar
TNFrank TNFrank is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Crossville, TN., U.S.A.
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Default

If you want small AND reliable it's hard to be a J-Frame.
__________________
S&W M642-2,
ATI 1911a1, 4.25"
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 03-01-2012, 06:46 PM
sophie's Avatar
sophie sophie is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Texas Panhandle
Posts: 7,226
Likes: 5,722
Liked 3,472 Times in 1,736 Posts
Default

I have carried PPK's, Mauser HSC, and I return to J frame Smith's. Not near as much to think about short of pulling the trigger and like Forrest Gump says "Thats all I'm gonna say bout that".



_____
James
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 03-01-2012, 06:49 PM
Dragon88 Dragon88 is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 107
Liked 456 Times in 205 Posts
Default

I chased a small, reliable semi-auto for a while. The last one I tried, a PF-9, left a really bad taste in my mouth. I traded it and went back to my 642.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 03-02-2012, 09:47 AM
1911bphil 1911bphil is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 49
Likes: 15
Liked 9 Times in 5 Posts
Default

To quote someone else "Its not supposed to be comfortable, its supposed to be comforting." I carry a J-frame because its idiot proof, which what I would probably become if I ever needed to use it. JMHO
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 03-02-2012, 10:41 AM
dinooch dinooch is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 156
Likes: 7
Liked 63 Times in 26 Posts
Default

99% of my pocket carry is a j-frame 442 or 340sc. If I really need the deepest concealment in hot weather with light clothing the Kel-Tec P32 is my choice although in a pinch the Thunderwear holster solves that problem and allows .357 or .38+P power at your disposal.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 03-02-2012, 10:50 AM
DonDee DonDee is offline
Member
Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto Chasing the pocket auto  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 62
Likes: 1
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Default

I love my J frames like nothing else. I will go to all lengths to try to conceal one in my front pocket. I'm comfortable with them, they feel so natural it's almost like an extension of my hand; I know them and trust them.

But since I've retired I've become a minimalist in all things possible, especially clothing. I wore wool suits every day for 40 years and I got good and sick of it. So now, especially given my haunts are GA and FL, I wear fairly thin khaki shorts every day possible. And by possible I'm not talking about the weather; I could care less about the temperature, winter or not. If my wife gets me to put on blue jeans it's likely a formal occasion. With a little shirttail help I can get by front-pocketing a J-frame in a Mika holster by far most of the time.

But having said the above, once in a blue moon for some reason I can't get by with my beloved J-frame. So what am I going to do, go naked? Not me; out comes the Seecamp. It weighs the same 14 oz. loaded as does my 340PD, but it's flat and tiny and all but disappears.

For me, when there is no other choice, something is better than nothing at all...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
340pd, 380, 442, 642, 649, cartridge, ccw, gunsmith, j frame, kahr, lock, ppk, seecamp, snubnose


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Had a great day chasing the N&W 611 stonehorses The Lounge 21 07-06-2015 10:14 AM
FS_ Desantis Nemesis Pocket Holster for Small Auto's- PA. --SPF-- kbm6893 Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 1 04-01-2015 03:02 PM
Best Pocket Sized Auto Sam Casey Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 57 08-11-2013 07:10 PM
Chasing Tail David LaPell The Lounge 23 04-13-2013 12:31 PM
Bobo's Pocket Auto Comparison Charts Marshall2 Concealed Carry & Self Defense 3 03-15-2009 11:38 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)