Questions about the S&W 60-4

dores585

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
48
Reaction score
2
Location
Huntsville, AL
This is the model 60 with the 3 inch full lug barrel. Can anyone provide their experience with this revolver, both positive and negative? From what I have read, the S&W 60-4 was a limited production run, does this make them any more special than any other model 60?
 
I have one. It's a fantastic revolver, but then all the S&W .38 specials and .357 magnums I've owned have been very accurate. I do not care to fire magnums in J frames and I like the older forged parts in the 60-4. It's my favorite centerfire J frame so it's "special" for me. However, I don’t believe they were a limited run, but rather their configuration was modernized into .357s not long after they were introduced. There are too many of them for them to be called scarce. .357s generally will sell to more people than revolvers chambered in .38 special that are identical otherwise so Cabela’s thought mine was so “not special” they priced it at $360 despite its 98% condition. A 60-4 was on my short list because a friend’s I’d fired at 100 yards produced accuracy some folks wouldn’t even believe.
 
Many consider this to be the ultimate trail gun, and prices are climbing steadily as a result. They are not as common as 2" fixed sight model 60s but usually one or more can be found for sale online.
 
Guys,
Thanks for the quick feed back. Sounds like the S&W 60-4 is a desireable revolver to acquire. I have successfully found one to procure and will proceed accordingly.
Thanks again!
 
I believe the 60-4 had a hammer mounted firing pin. It is worth buying for that reason alone. Some of the newer models with independant firing pin suffer from unsure ignition due to light strikes on some brands of ammunition. My 60-16 had to have a longer firing pin installed. Then they caution not to dry fire it. The hammer mounted firing pin suffers from none of this.
 
I bought one when they were first introduced. Ditched the rubber grips and installed Smith target grips on it. It is accurate(all I shoot in it is cast reloads)and good looking too. Mine has forged flash chromed hammer & trigger. I wouldn't trade it even for the same gun in .357.
 
From what I have read, the S&W 60-4 was a limited production run, does this make them any more special than any other model 60?

It does to me. I have had one since they came out and other than the standard configuration M60 (2-inch tapered barrel, round-butt, fixed sights), it is the only Model 60 that really interests me. I have a 60-10 and to be honest, I much prefer the 60-4.

Since anything I would have to say about the gun would be positive, I will keep it simple and say if you think you have any need for this type of revolver and you know where to find one at a reasonable price, by all means, buy it. :)
 
If you get it, you won't be sorry. I bought mine when they first hit the market. It is the perfect trail gun. The adjustable sites and full lug barrel make it easy to shoot accurately, yet it is light and compact enough to carry all day.
 
My understanding is that this 60-4 with the target sights and trigger was a limited run. Was told that on another forum. This was the quote: "The Model 60-4 was introduced in 1990 as a limited production target model with the full underlug barrel and the new yoke retention system (larger front sideplate screw).
I picked mine up at a local pawn shop a few weeks ago. It shot low, but after an adjustment it is very accurate. Plan on sticking with standard 38spl loads and not use the +p, even tho others have said it was alright. I've been watching one on Gun Broker, just to see what it sells for. (SMITH & WESSON MODEL 60-4 .38spl. 3)


P1010606_zps69680178.jpg

P1010605_zps4cee59b0.jpg
 
I have one. They are a compact & accurate revolver. Light, easy to clean, and adj. sights. Whats not to like?

Chop
 
And now the $64,000 question. Does anyone know of a Kydex Paddle holster for this model? One they know that works for sure? I bought an ITAC paddle for the J-frame, Model 60 was listed, and with the high blade on the front site, this model does not fit. On its way back. Thanks in advance.
 
I would say that the 60-4 provides K-frame accuracy in a more compact revolver. The balance is excellent if one likes a little heft at the front end, which I do, especially in a smaller revolver. It helps soak up recoil, allowing you to use a wide range of ammo without pain.

It's a good platform for a small-handed shooter, where an L-frame may be too large and heavy, and a lightweight snub too hard to shoot accurately and too snappy in recoil.

Compared to the standard 1.875" M60, you get an extra 1.125" of sight picture, an extra 1.125" of muzzle velocity, much better sights, and a full-length ejector rod. Taken together, it adds up to a much more competent performer, addressing many of the compromises of snubnose revolvers while remaining a reasonable size and weight.

The 60-4 is sort of the ultimate hybrid. Some may feel it is too compromised and does nothing well. But holding it in the hand, it just feels right. Rather than doing nothing well, it attempts to do everything well, and largely succeeds. With larger grips, you can compete with full-size handguns on the target range. With boot grips and removal of the rear sight, you can pocket carry the 60-4 in the right kind of pants.

But the 60-4 probably works best, as others have said, as the ultimate trail gun. Rugged stainless finish and built before many of the modern changes took place (no IL or MIM, firing pin is on the hammer). Easy to carry on a belt or shoulder holster or in a pack or tackle box. Accurate and powerful enough to put meat in the pot. Can use powderpuff loads for smaller game, shot loads for snake country, and +P for defense against larger predators.
 
Last edited:
Holsters for 3" J's are few and far between. Simplest and most comfortable holster I have found is the Bianchi Black Widow. I have never seen a paddle for one.
 
The SCSW does indeed write 60-4s were a limited production run. However, considering that there are 60-4s with chrome plated internals and later ones with unplated case hardened innards limited production runs might be better wording.
We seem to agree they are fairly easy to shoot accurately, and my guess is we'd all agree their older style frame is better looking than the J magnum frame.
I think I was very fortunate to stumble onto mine for $360 plus tax. Since I already bought mine and I don't sell guns it shouldn't matter, but I'm curious what dores585 is paying for his.
 
Holsters for 3" J's are few and far between. Simplest and most comfortable holster I have found is the Bianchi Black Widow. I have never seen a paddle for one.

I would be interested in looking at one of those. Does yours have a model number or some kind of reference stamped on it? I already have one for my "K" frame and it is marked S&W/Ruger 38/357. They have one listed for a "J" frame and wondering if that is the correct model. Thanks
 
I would be interested in looking at one of those. Does yours have a model number or some kind of reference stamped on it? I already have one for my "K" frame and it is marked S&W/Ruger 38/357. They have one listed for a "J" frame and wondering if that is the correct model. Thanks


The holster is stamped Bianchi #5 Black Widow S&W Chief 1009

I believe I remember that they advertise it as being for the snub nose but since the holster is open on the bottom it works fine for the 3 inch model.
 
K22fan - I ended up giving $475 for the revolver, box, tools, and papers. Saw one for $420 that had scratches on the cylinder and no box, no tools, and no papers. I opted for the complete package.
 
Now that buying it is behind you it's time to see how well you shoot with it. I think you'll be happy.
I like the rubber that came on mine. It's just the standard issue. Some day I'll probably dress it up with wood but looks are a lower priority than hand fit for me. The J frame is S&W's only frame that has too short a trigger reah for me without grip material covering the back strap, other wise I'd use a pair of Targets or a Hogue stock both of which I like on larger frames.
Good luck with yours.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top