model 66 or 69?

bounty hunter

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Messages
42
Reaction score
44
I have the oppertunity to buy either the new model 66 or model 69 (for 2014). Both are 4.25 barrels and both are going for $725.00. My question is which one should I get? I love both of themI am currently between .357's, but the attraction of the .44 is very strong (since I do not have a .44 either). What are the pros and cons of each model? Thank you for all of your input.
 
Register to hide this ad
I would go with the 66. I think the 357 mag/38 spec combo is a lot more practical for most people's needs than the 44s. I haven't shot a 69 but I'm guessing the 66 would be much more pleasant to shoot at the range. Of course someone will suggest to get both which is the easy answer!
 
Well, I am a big bore enthusiast, and I reload, so a model 69 would better fit my revolver needs. For the average guy, who does not reload, and is looking for a good all around revolver, the .357 is a better choice.

That said, if you plan on taking up reloading, or don't mind paying a premium for 44 spl. / 44 mag ammo, then it is a versatile round that is a lot of fun to shoot.

Larry
 
The new M66 & M69 are basically twins when it comes to size and weight.

So, you first need to identify what you plan on using the revolver for.

The M66 will be cheaper, more pleasant to shoot and will likely handle 95% of all situations you will ever encounter.

If you need more power, the M69 is obviously the answer. While the .44 Mag can be difficult to handle shooting full house loads it is quite comfortable/enjoyable with .44 special level ammo.

Handloading would allow you to shoot more in either caliber -- moreso with the .44.

FWIW,

Paul
 
model 66

I believe that I will be getting the 66 for the previously posted reasons. I love the though of having another .357 in the house again (born and raised on the wheel guns). Now my situation will be trying to find a holster for it for the casual range visits and tromps through the woods. The extra .25" barrel messes up the traditional 4" K frame holster category. Any suggestions on holsters? Thanks.
 
Some VERY knowledgeable folks sounding off here! Can't disagree with any of them. FWIW, the 4" .357 is a platform that has been around for ages, and, all things being equal, the bugs have pretty much been worked out of it.

The 69 is the 'new kid on the block,' a 5-shot L-frame .44 Magnum. Don't know if 'revolutionary' is the correct word, but it is a stunning concept. I myself would like to see many more range/field reports before I render my 'verdict.'

That being said, I'd go with the 66.
 
I believe that I will be getting the 66 for the previously posted reasons. I love the though of having another .357 in the house again (born and raised on the wheel guns). Now my situation will be trying to find a holster for it for the casual range visits and tromps through the woods. The extra .25" barrel messes up the traditional 4" K frame holster category. Any suggestions on holsters? Thanks.

I have a new 66 and my El Paso Saddlery Strongside Select for my 4" 617 works.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    74.9 KB · Views: 53
I agree on the cautions against the .44, but everyone has to start somewhere getting experience with the big-bore magnums. Plus NO revolver shooter should be without at least one .357.

It'd be a tough call for me. I own 2 66s, but I'm a fan of 2-piece barrels and crane-to-frame lockups.

That said, who knows how long both will be in production, especially, IMO, the 69. Despite it's current popularity, I'm suspicious as to whether a 5-round medium-frame revolver will hold it's appeal long-term with the shooting public. Should one or both models be discontinued, it will be way easier to find a used 66 on down the road.
 
I believe that I will be getting the 66 for the previously posted reasons. I love the though of having another .357 in the house again (born and raised on the wheel guns). Now my situation will be trying to find a holster for it for the casual range visits and tromps through the woods. The extra .25" barrel messes up the traditional 4" K frame holster category. Any suggestions on holsters? Thanks.

All of my medium frame 4" holsters have worked fine with the 4.25" barreledModel 69. (Already had a Model 66 and have been reloading .44 Mags for ages.) With one old Roy's Pancake the muzzle protrudes, but that's not the 69's fault. The same happens with all of the 4" barreled revolvers, too! Otherwise, even the closed front holsters have worked fine. 5BHLs, 111 Cyclones and Cyclone IIs, DeSantis, Rogers, PWL, etc. For woods use, I usually employ a flap holster. Generally an M11 USGI holster for the M9 pistol. Will hold not only M9s but M1911s and 4" revolvers!
 
The logic to choose the 66 over the 69 because it's a yeoman caliber, with a proven track record is inescapable. However, logic is what we use when we tell OTHERS what to buy...deep down inside, gun purchases are like new girlfriends...we're not sure exactly why, we just gots to have her!

I like the .357 magnum (who doesn't really) because it can do just about everything...actually, with the right loads, in the right hands, it can do EVERYTHING anyone might need. Time was, the .357 Magnum was "exotic"...the new kid on the block with brute power beyond anyone's dreams. Short barrels and liability loads have dimmed some of the aura, however those who load their own know the potential. A point in favor of the 66 is it's about well balanced for the cartridge as possible...it's not really built for a continuous diet of the hot stuff (but how many shoot that much hot stuff), and it's compact enough for general, all-around carry - even field carry.

On the other hand...the 69 is that new girl...with the exotic looks, with the allure of something wilder than you've ever known lurking behind smooth lines. A .44 Magnum in an L-frame is NOT to be dismissed lightly. Why? Because it TOO is an all-around performer, with known "street cred" as to its ability to settle the hash of the baddest of the bad. Five rounds is only one less than six, and for that sacrifice you get a much slimmer gun...not as blocky and chunky as the "old gal," but sleek and bulging in the just the right places to just the right amount! The L-frame .44 magnum probably isn't meant to take a daily beating of hundreds of full-house magnum rounds, but then who shoots like that? Nobody who's paying the freight for their own ammo and guns that's for sure. MOST who shoot a lot of .44 "magnum" ammo tend to load their own and tend to load a bit milder than top drawer, but whatEVER "they" do, it's what YOU do that counts. I personally find the notion of a "slimline" .44 magnum quite appealing...but then I've been "going to see the varmint" since I was 16 and don't seem to have enough sense to stop now.

Prices being equal...I'd buy the 69 today, tomorrow, next week, next year. There are a LOT of "Yeoman" .357 Magnum choices around...how many L-frame .44 Magnums? A handloader can dial the big cartridge up and down to suit...from mild to wild...and any way you slice the donut, a 240 grain hardcast SWC at 900 fps beats a 158 grain hardcast SWC at 900 fps. A 240 grain JHP at 1250 fps beats a 158 grain JHP at 1250 fps...and so it goes...
 
Prices being equal...I'd buy the 69 today, tomorrow, next week, next year. There are a LOT of "Yeoman" .357 Magnum choices around...

My thoughts exactly. I know the OP has already decided on a 66 but there are so many good used .357's on the market for much less than a new one that I would buy used if going for a .357.
 
357/.38 Spl. will cover 95% of what utility value the platform offers.

Say what... ? :rolleyes:

Not sure what that means but I vote for... either! I'd have a hard time choosing. Don't think you can make a bad choice. :)

...The 69 is the 'new kid on the block,' a 5-shot L-frame .44 Magnum. Don't know if 'revolutionary' is the correct word, but it is a stunning concept. I myself would like to see many more range/field reports before I render my 'verdict.'

That being said, I'd go with the 66.

No sense of adventure at all. Tisk-tisk... :)
 
Funny thing is that when I went to go looking at both guns, there was a model 629 3" Talo edition sitting right down the counter and after considering all three options, I opted for the sledge hammer and walked out with the 629. I felt that the 629 would be a much easier ride lighting off .44 mag loads than the model 69.
 
That 3-inch 629 will be no piece of cake! :eek: :D

You probably made a wise choice and now that you have confessed to your humble enablers, you have to let us in on the details, preferably with pics. :)
 
Back
Top