dwever
Well-known member
UPDATE 29 Aug - Qualified with my 586 L-Comp at my agency today as a BUG - had seven moon clips in my left front pants pocket for the 50 shot timed course of fire (double action the whole way).
ORIGINAL POST: After eyeballing different samples of this weapon since 2013, I made the purchase while up in TN. It showed up this week.
I think the best way to make this report is to also compare and contrast my 627 which has been my favorite all time revolver to the point that I have bought two identical samples.
Both the 586 and 627 are pictured below.
1. While I am comparing an N frame 2.625" barreled N Frame in the 627 to a full lug barreled 3" 586 L frame, interestingly their weight is just a tenth of an ounce different (37.6 for the N frame and 37.5).
2. I like that this 586 has forged steel parts where sometimes you might find MIM as you can see in the picture the hammer and trigger. Not suggesting at all that MIM parts will fail a revolver, I just think it is a nice touch for a semi-custom S&W gun spec'd by Talo. The 627 on the other hand has for example Chrome Flashed hammer and trigger.
3. Both grips are very comfortable for their size (I am 6'1" and wear x-large gloves), with the nod going to the 586 Walnut grips. The 586 also comes with a larger rubber Hogue grip, but they compromise concealment.
4. My one of two just ever so slight disappointments with the 586 is DA shooting. It is good, perhaps very good, but not great; just not the buttery smoothness of the 627 which has had no work after purchase. I am going to have someone go through and detail fit and stone all contact areas, and that will fix that. Not really a problem, but short of the experience I have had with the Performance Center 627 UDR. Trigger pull weight is about the same between the two.
5. Very pleased with 586 L Frame size. You would not want the N Frame 627 in an IWB holster, no problem for the 586. I have ordered two holsters, Galco Silhouette High Ride and IWB Summer Holster. The IWB is a compromise because the closest Galco comes in a 586 is 4" barrel. Both are backordered just ten days or so, so I'm using an old Desantis thumb-break scabbard for now.
6. Regarding the 586's compensated barrel, I really don't notice a difference shooting American Eagle 130 grain 38's. With Speer Gold Dot Short Barrel +P you can just slightly feel the recoil coming more back instead of up, more so with 490 ft. lbs. .357 American Eagle. I found the weapon in DA with the hotter .357 to be controllable, but of course a handful.
I lost a little skin after round numbers eight through fourteen in hot .357 DA. Not something that has happened with the 627, just different grips. I really need some additional range time with hot .357 to report better on the compensated barrel.
However, as carry, I use either 38+P or .357 JHP Speer Gold Dots Short Barrel. Even in the .357, that particular bullet is 290 ft. lbs. of energy, and very manageable, good follow up; whereas the .357 Federal Premium personal defense Hydra Shok 'low recoil' is 490 ft. lbs. and is a handful (I only have experience with that in the 627).
Parenthetically, the compensated effect was not the straight back in to your hand experience of a 7.5" barreled compensated 629 blowing hot .44 magnums (that comparison point gun I used has a scope on top too).
7. My second small disappointment is that I am not sure about the Trijicon Tritium sight in the ramped sight. It needs to be bigger. I have Trijicons in both my duty Glocks, and while the 1/3 the size dot in the 586 is usable, it comes up short.
8. Moon clips - 7-round moon clips in an L-Frame cylinder is a bit more compact re-loading experience than 8-Shot N Frame, but it is fine and fast. 3 came with the weapon, I had TK Custom send me 10 match-grade moon clips that arrived the same day as the gun. The S&W clips work fine, but the TK Customs are really the ticket and are faster due to their firmness and via their thickness. Interestingly, with the 586 L-Comp, only the S&W moon clips work perfectly smoothly with the Speer Gold Dots mentioned in point 6 that I use for carry.
One annoying but not problematic aspect of moon clips is that different ammo works best with certain ammunition, so you end up with different clip collections. Darn it. For Federal round nose .38 (and other Federal) I used in USPSA some years back, it is 0.025 match grade TK Custom. Then, I bought 0.020 Match Grade for the Speer Gold Dots, and while they work great in the 627 they struggle a little bit in the 586, but the Speer Gold Dots work great when in the S&W Moon Clips in the 586. Go figure.
9. Cleaning is a bit more difficult of course because you're not able to see the carbon nearly as well. You know where they get dirty from experience. But I'll probably clean it less
.
10. Shooting experience is top notch, accurate, feels right, glad I bought it. Would probably give the nod to the 627 overall shooting experience, but they are close, and the difference likely will not stand after a detail fit and stone of all contact areas. Concealment and carry, same weight, but the 586 handily gets the nod with it's much narrower L-Frame cylinder.
ORIGINAL POST: After eyeballing different samples of this weapon since 2013, I made the purchase while up in TN. It showed up this week.
I think the best way to make this report is to also compare and contrast my 627 which has been my favorite all time revolver to the point that I have bought two identical samples.
Both the 586 and 627 are pictured below.
1. While I am comparing an N frame 2.625" barreled N Frame in the 627 to a full lug barreled 3" 586 L frame, interestingly their weight is just a tenth of an ounce different (37.6 for the N frame and 37.5).
2. I like that this 586 has forged steel parts where sometimes you might find MIM as you can see in the picture the hammer and trigger. Not suggesting at all that MIM parts will fail a revolver, I just think it is a nice touch for a semi-custom S&W gun spec'd by Talo. The 627 on the other hand has for example Chrome Flashed hammer and trigger.
3. Both grips are very comfortable for their size (I am 6'1" and wear x-large gloves), with the nod going to the 586 Walnut grips. The 586 also comes with a larger rubber Hogue grip, but they compromise concealment.
4. My one of two just ever so slight disappointments with the 586 is DA shooting. It is good, perhaps very good, but not great; just not the buttery smoothness of the 627 which has had no work after purchase. I am going to have someone go through and detail fit and stone all contact areas, and that will fix that. Not really a problem, but short of the experience I have had with the Performance Center 627 UDR. Trigger pull weight is about the same between the two.
5. Very pleased with 586 L Frame size. You would not want the N Frame 627 in an IWB holster, no problem for the 586. I have ordered two holsters, Galco Silhouette High Ride and IWB Summer Holster. The IWB is a compromise because the closest Galco comes in a 586 is 4" barrel. Both are backordered just ten days or so, so I'm using an old Desantis thumb-break scabbard for now.
6. Regarding the 586's compensated barrel, I really don't notice a difference shooting American Eagle 130 grain 38's. With Speer Gold Dot Short Barrel +P you can just slightly feel the recoil coming more back instead of up, more so with 490 ft. lbs. .357 American Eagle. I found the weapon in DA with the hotter .357 to be controllable, but of course a handful.
I lost a little skin after round numbers eight through fourteen in hot .357 DA. Not something that has happened with the 627, just different grips. I really need some additional range time with hot .357 to report better on the compensated barrel.
However, as carry, I use either 38+P or .357 JHP Speer Gold Dots Short Barrel. Even in the .357, that particular bullet is 290 ft. lbs. of energy, and very manageable, good follow up; whereas the .357 Federal Premium personal defense Hydra Shok 'low recoil' is 490 ft. lbs. and is a handful (I only have experience with that in the 627).
Parenthetically, the compensated effect was not the straight back in to your hand experience of a 7.5" barreled compensated 629 blowing hot .44 magnums (that comparison point gun I used has a scope on top too).
7. My second small disappointment is that I am not sure about the Trijicon Tritium sight in the ramped sight. It needs to be bigger. I have Trijicons in both my duty Glocks, and while the 1/3 the size dot in the 586 is usable, it comes up short.
8. Moon clips - 7-round moon clips in an L-Frame cylinder is a bit more compact re-loading experience than 8-Shot N Frame, but it is fine and fast. 3 came with the weapon, I had TK Custom send me 10 match-grade moon clips that arrived the same day as the gun. The S&W clips work fine, but the TK Customs are really the ticket and are faster due to their firmness and via their thickness. Interestingly, with the 586 L-Comp, only the S&W moon clips work perfectly smoothly with the Speer Gold Dots mentioned in point 6 that I use for carry.
One annoying but not problematic aspect of moon clips is that different ammo works best with certain ammunition, so you end up with different clip collections. Darn it. For Federal round nose .38 (and other Federal) I used in USPSA some years back, it is 0.025 match grade TK Custom. Then, I bought 0.020 Match Grade for the Speer Gold Dots, and while they work great in the 627 they struggle a little bit in the 586, but the Speer Gold Dots work great when in the S&W Moon Clips in the 586. Go figure.
9. Cleaning is a bit more difficult of course because you're not able to see the carbon nearly as well. You know where they get dirty from experience. But I'll probably clean it less

10. Shooting experience is top notch, accurate, feels right, glad I bought it. Would probably give the nod to the 627 overall shooting experience, but they are close, and the difference likely will not stand after a detail fit and stone of all contact areas. Concealment and carry, same weight, but the 586 handily gets the nod with it's much narrower L-Frame cylinder.
Attachments
Last edited: