Considering a 6 inch 617. Years ago I had a mk 3 hunter was a very accurate gun but traded it like a dummy..anyway was wondering if the 617 is a better gun is it as accurate as a ruger hunter. Any input would be greatly appreciated thanks
This guys post is spot on. If you like to build and tinker the Ruger is way to go. If you want a flat out great revolver that happens to have a cylinder with ten tiny holes that has a great trigger and accuracy out of the box then go with the Smith. I've never shot the mkiv Target but I used to own a mkii government and it was a nice pistol. This is a good dilemma to have.I do love my k22's, but that Mk4 Target seems to go to the range with me every time. The Mk4 is much easier to load and clean, and the accuracies of any of them exceed my abilities. Well...truth be told: after installing a Volquartsen trigger kit, upgraded front & rear sights and firing pin, and better grips for the Mk4 Target, anyways. Maybe I've just got more tinkering invested into the Mk4; never had to do much of anything to my k22's.
Now I'm confused. -S2
Kind of an apple or orange comparison. I would go so far as to say there will be no difference in the accuracy, it depends on how well you can shoot either of them. Which one you like better, and which one's grips fit your hand the best. This is after you have determined what ammo each one specifically likes.