|
 |

08-10-2022, 08:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 68 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
New rear sight for the 586.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|

08-10-2022, 08:57 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 3,452
Liked 24,170 Times in 6,167 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the Forum
That sight is quite similar to the Extreme Duty rear sight that Cylinder & Slide has been offering for a decade or two
Smith & Wesson used this sight on the Night Guard revolver series.
The rear sight that was chosen had a U shape notch instead of the traditional squared notch. This was supposed to make lining up with the Tritium filled Ashley Express front sight quicker.
__________________
"Acta non verba"
Last edited by colt_saa; 08-11-2022 at 03:41 AM.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|

08-11-2022, 07:54 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 768
Likes: 1,682
Liked 1,436 Times in 482 Posts
|
|
I'm not sure that a fiber optic front is going to be as "bombproof" as the rear sight you've chosen.
Most fiber optic sights are the opposite of bombproof.
I like the Dawson white dot Tritium, as easy to see in the day as F/O, and much, much easier to see in dim light than F/O, and more durable.
__________________
U. S. Army Veteran
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|

08-11-2022, 06:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 68 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandog
I'm not sure that a fiber optic front is going to be as "bombproof" as the rear sight you've chosen.
Most fiber optic sights are the opposite of bombproof.
I like the Dawson white dot Tritium, as easy to see in the day as F/O, and much, much easier to see in dim light than F/O, and more durable.
|
I agree with you in terms of a FO front sight not being as durable as a tritium sight. However I’ve carried a FO front sight on my defensive pistols for years (and on competition guns) without ever having one break. It’s really just a personal preference of mine. I’m not a fan of “night sights” (tritium) at all, as I personally see no benefit. Worst case scenario with my FO sights, if the FO breaks or falls out, I still have a solid black sight to use, so they aren’t entirely inoperable!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

08-14-2022, 10:07 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 768
Likes: 1,682
Liked 1,436 Times in 482 Posts
|
|
O.K. You're fine with using a sight that has no visibility benefits unless there is direct/indirect sunlight, and one that is less durable, because it will still work when damaged.
Got it.
__________________
U. S. Army Veteran
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

08-16-2022, 09:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 68 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandog
O.K. You're fine with using a sight that has no visibility benefits unless there is direct/indirect sunlight, and one that is less durable, because it will still work when damaged.
Got it.
|
Now you’re catching on!
In reality, I always chuckle at those that find “benefit” using “night sights.” To each their own, but please explain to me what use they have? Am I really going to use them at “night” to shoot something I can’t PID? If you’re using white light, like you should be, night sights are useless as whatever you’re using sight wise, are backlit anyway….
If you ARE using night sights, (which let’s be honest - none are that bright anyway) to shoot something in the dark….well, you’re doing something wrong anyway….
But who am I….talking tactics and TTPs is like discussing politics or religion, people are emotionally attached to their way…
|

08-17-2022, 08:45 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 768
Likes: 1,682
Liked 1,436 Times in 482 Posts
|
|
I always chuckle at those who assume that those who use Tritium sights are always going to blast away at a noise in the night without I.D.'ing it first.
And yes, If you also have a white light, any sights, Tritium or not are going to be visible.
Tritium sights are most useful when it's still light enough to see the target, but the sights are hard to see.
There are a lot of times like this, called dawn and dusk.
If you live to be 75, that's close to 55,000 times that you might need to use your gun and defend yourself in LOW light conditions (not NO light).
Tritium is just another tool in the toolbox, and a whole lot more versatile than fiber optic.
I always thought that Fiber Optic were more the realm of target/competition shooters.
All of the LEO departments across the country (and the military) must agree with me, as I don't know any who order their firearms with Fiber Optic sights, all the ones I know of come with Tritium.
__________________
U. S. Army Veteran
|

08-17-2022, 12:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Western MT.
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 6,788
Liked 1,435 Times in 588 Posts
|
|
Don't you guys make me pull this car over.......
__________________
Todd
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

08-17-2022, 09:05 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 68 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Alright Sandog you win, you win! I surrender.
Regardless, loving the 586 as a carry piece in a JM custom Kydex AIWB rig. Having carried a lot of different guns over the years personally and for work, both open and concealed, this is the first time carrying a wheel gun and with the right loaders I don’t feel at much of a disadvantage at all.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|