Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2024, 10:04 PM
wellthought1 wellthought1 is offline
Member
Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2"  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 380
Likes: 573
Liked 383 Times in 156 Posts
Default Question about model 60-9 2"

Is it safe to fire heavy bullets in a Smith & Wesson model 60-9? I have several boxes of American Eagle 158 grain JSP. For carry, I use Federal 125 grain JHP. I sold my 686 and the model 60 is the only .357 magnum I own. TIA.

Last edited by wellthought1; 04-29-2024 at 10:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2024, 10:28 PM
22hipower 22hipower is online now
SWCA Member
Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2"  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 4,300
Likes: 8,229
Liked 12,429 Times in 2,820 Posts
Default

The 158s should be fine, pretty much the historical standard weight for 357s I think. I have the 60-10 and have never hesitated to shoot any factory 357 Mag from it.

Jeff
SWCA #1457
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 04-29-2024, 10:41 PM
two-bit cowboy's Avatar
two-bit cowboy two-bit cowboy is offline
US Veteran
Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2"  
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: at town's end in ol' Wyo
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 17,585
Liked 18,573 Times in 5,087 Posts
Default

I wouldn't hesitate to put 158s through mine.

The barrel is 2⅛".
__________________
Wrangler of stray Chiefs
Bob
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 04-30-2024, 12:32 AM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2"  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 27,047
Likes: 1,058
Liked 19,234 Times in 9,394 Posts
Default

Perfectly safe as noted above. You may want to try both loads out at the range, point of impact may vary significantly.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 04-30-2024, 07:24 AM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2"  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,841
Likes: 19,817
Liked 11,995 Times in 5,440 Posts
Default

158 grain full power loads will actually cause less forcing cone erosion than full power 125 grain loads.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 04-30-2024, 07:31 AM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
Question about model 60-9 2"  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,916
Likes: 7,908
Liked 26,010 Times in 8,769 Posts
Default

Not a question of pressure or damage to the gun, but in my opinion you would be better off using Buffalo Bore 38 Spl. +P "heavy" 158 grain LSWCHP-GC. They move out of a 1 7/8" Chief's Spl. barrel at 1,025 fps. I have personally chronographed them many many times and that is no exaggeration!

Recoil recovery is much faster for follow up shots, accuracy of the BB bullet is superb and POA = POI out of most M60's & M36's while pressure is lower and causes less metal stretching over time. The noise level is much lower (important to you if shots are fired inside a car or house), muzzle flash is a lot less than the magnum load and the BB 158 gr. +P's have proven themselves over the years. From a 2" barrel, the BB round could actually have a greater muzzle velocity as well - much of the gun powder of the magnum loading is being burned outside of the barrel so it is not adding to the propulsion of the projectile. Magnums were NEVER designed for 2" barrels, 6" barrels were their intended usage.

IMHO shooting 357 magnums out of a 2" barreled gun is self defeating, but obviously you are free to do what you want - your gun. Please borrow a chronograph if you don't own one and test the 158 grain magnum's velocity out of your revolver. If the actual velocity (not what is stated on the box as they do not rate them for 2" bbls) is the same or less than the Bufffalo Bore 38 special loading, then you have proof you are not carrying the best load for that gun. I can pretty much tell you that here but I doubt you would believe me. Even if it is the same or just slightly more, there is still no advantage because of all the negatives listed above. Remember, for a bullet's speed to increase, powder must be burned inside an enclosed tube to propel the bullet to greater speeds. While the huge muzzle flash might be something to look at - it can also cause temporary night blindness and retard follow up shots. IMHO, Magnum's out of 2" barrels are not optimal at all. The BB load is absolutely excellent. BTW, I have no association with BB what so ever and have no horse in this race. This has been my experience and have never carried 357 magnums in a 2" barreled gun since actually testing them against BB +P Heavy rounds. A minimum effective barrel length for 158 grain mag's is 3" and longer. 6-8" is optimal.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 04-30-2024, 09:37 AM
jcelect jcelect is offline
US Veteran
Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2"  
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio,USA
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 872
Liked 6,340 Times in 1,582 Posts
Default Muzzle flash

Muzzle flash serves no useful purpose! Muzzle flash is burning powder past the end of the barrel, which translate to money spent for no gain!
jcelect
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 05-01-2024, 07:10 AM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2"  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,841
Likes: 19,817
Liked 11,995 Times in 5,440 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcelect View Post
Muzzle flash serves no useful purpose! Muzzle flash is burning powder past the end of the barrel, which translate to money spent for no gain!
jcelect
I dunno 'bout that. It does make for a great fireworks display. It can clear the lanes on either side of you at the range. If you don't hit your target in a defensive situation, at least you will singe them.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 05-01-2024, 10:17 AM
mikerjf mikerjf is offline
Member
Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2"  
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 2,296
Liked 2,985 Times in 1,114 Posts
Default

No prob at all with 158 grain.
__________________
Uvidíme se později, aligátore.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 05-02-2024, 09:24 PM
JMD999 JMD999 is offline
SWCA Member
Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2"  
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: NH
Posts: 43
Likes: 83
Liked 53 Times in 24 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chief38 View Post
Not a question of pressure or damage to the gun, but in my opinion you would be better off using Buffalo Bore 38 Spl. +P "heavy" 158 grain LSWCHP-GC. They move out of a 1 7/8" Chief's Spl. barrel at 1,025 fps. I have personally chronographed them many many times and that is no exaggeration!

Recoil recovery is much faster for follow up shots, accuracy of the BB bullet is superb and POA = POI out of most M60's & M36's while pressure is lower and causes less metal stretching over time. The noise level is much lower (important to you if shots are fired inside a car or house), muzzle flash is a lot less than the magnum load and the BB 158 gr. +P's have proven themselves over the years. From a 2" barrel, the BB round could actually have a greater muzzle velocity as well - much of the gun powder of the magnum loading is being burned outside of the barrel so it is not adding to the propulsion of the projectile. Magnums were NEVER designed for 2" barrels, 6" barrels were their intended usage.

IMHO shooting 357 magnums out of a 2" barreled gun is self defeating, but obviously you are free to do what you want - your gun. Please borrow a chronograph if you don't own one and test the 158 grain magnum's velocity out of your revolver. If the actual velocity (not what is stated on the box as they do not rate them for 2" bbls) is the same or less than the Bufffalo Bore 38 special loading, then you have proof you are not carrying the best load for that gun. I can pretty much tell you that here but I doubt you would believe me. Even if it is the same or just slightly more, there is still no advantage because of all the negatives listed above. Remember, for a bullet's speed to increase, powder must be burned inside an enclosed tube to propel the bullet to greater speeds. While the huge muzzle flash might be something to look at - it can also cause temporary night blindness and retard follow up shots. IMHO, Magnum's out of 2" barrels are not optimal at all. The BB load is absolutely excellent. BTW, I have no association with BB what so ever and have no horse in this race. This has been my experience and have never carried 357 magnums in a 2" barreled gun since actually testing them against BB +P Heavy rounds. A minimum effective barrel length for 158 grain mag's is 3" and longer. 6-8" is optimal.
Well stated, for all those reasons BB 158 grain LSWCHP-GC has been in my pocket for years. Not fun to shoot out of a lightweight snub /but its not a range toy.
Plus- They use low flash powder, and a lead bullet can be reach higher velocity than jacketed with in the pressure envelope -most notable in short barrels. (i also like 148/150 wadcutters at 7-800 fps.)- those make it a fun "range toy".
Smiles, Mike
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 05-03-2024, 09:18 AM
Retired W4's Avatar
Retired W4 Retired W4 is online now
US Veteran
Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2"  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 16,650
Liked 20,311 Times in 4,606 Posts
Default

I think the 60-9 (J Magnum) will handle anything you put through it. This one belonged to my wife and she kept it loaded with Remington 158 lead HP +P. Looks like a semi-wadcutter with hollow point. We traded it for an Ashford Shooter's Supply Model 60 Target and load it with the same. It's not a carry piece for her. It resides in a drawer in the coffee table where she usually sits.

I pity the fool who comes in uninvited.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC09358 (2).jpg (128.6 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg ash1 (2).jpg (52.3 KB, 13 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 05-03-2024, 10:57 AM
Cal44 Cal44 is offline
Member
Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2" Question about model 60-9 2"  
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,580
Likes: 5,501
Liked 6,435 Times in 1,869 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcelect View Post
Muzzle flash serves no useful purpose! Muzzle flash is burning powder past the end of the barrel, which translate to money spent for no gain!
jcelect
I have a 629 ported 44 Magnum with a 2 1/2 inch barrel.

The same logic applies there

I shoot 44 special from it. If I ever carried it around town, it would be loaded with BB 44 special.

On the other hand, if I carried it as a bear defense gun I'd probably load it with 44 Magnum.

The muzzle flash from a ported 44 mag would be horrendous, I figure even if I missed it would set the bear on fire.

Last edited by Cal44; 05-03-2024 at 11:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Triple Lock "Target" Model question mrcvs S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 16 07-31-2018 11:22 AM
Question about Model 66-5 with "3 inch" barrel **PHOTOS ADDED** vigil617 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 31 10-30-2016 01:14 PM
Late 1940's "Pre-Model 10" Grip Question 357magster S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 6 08-03-2016 06:49 PM
.357 Magnum "Pre-Model 19" serial number Question Harkrader S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 28 05-24-2015 02:25 PM
Model 1 3rd issue "early topstrap" question twaits S&W Antiques 4 04-13-2011 11:03 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)