Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-17-2024, 01:09 PM
Mercury's Avatar
Mercury Mercury is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 468
Likes: 1,056
Liked 555 Times in 213 Posts
Default Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29

I have a good friend who is an FFL and does a lot of business with Lipsey's and he managed to get his hands on a 432 UC and ship it to me.

This one has a gap between the yoke and the frame. The cylinder doesn't open or close smoothly either. Because it was a transfer, there was no refusing delivery anyway.

I've read about the poor quality of S&W's revolvers lately but this model seemed too neat to pass up, so I figured that I'd take a chance on getting a good one.
Well, that didn't work out too well.

Shame on Lipsey's too. They should have caught this defect and never sent it out.

I now have to figure out how to get a return label and send it back.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Lipsey's 432 UC Yoke-Frame Gap.jpg (117.9 KB, 404 views)

Last edited by Mercury; 07-21-2024 at 11:59 AM. Reason: Updating the thread
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 05-17-2024, 01:12 PM
Baxter6551 Baxter6551 is online now
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 5,898
Liked 4,963 Times in 1,463 Posts
Default

That’s ridiculous. Reminds me why I look for used pre lock revolvers.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 05-17-2024, 01:14 PM
SnidelyWhiplash SnidelyWhiplash is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,165
Likes: 180
Liked 13,950 Times in 2,761 Posts
Default

That should never had gotten past the assembler or the inspector. Heads should roll over such obviously poor quality control.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 05-17-2024, 01:14 PM
Frailer's Avatar
Frailer Frailer is offline
US Veteran
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Knox, Kentucky
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 490
Liked 2,475 Times in 502 Posts
Default

Whoa. That is…glaring.
__________________
Mark Lathem
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 05-17-2024, 03:40 PM
Mercury's Avatar
Mercury Mercury is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 468
Likes: 1,056
Liked 555 Times in 213 Posts
Default

These guns aren't inexpensive, entry level models. It's really disappointing that something so glaring gets by whatever final inspections are performed......if any are performed at all.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 05-17-2024, 03:59 PM
hkcavalier's Avatar
hkcavalier hkcavalier is offline
US Veteran
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 3,600
Likes: 1,882
Liked 8,226 Times in 2,112 Posts
Default

I knew the S&W factory was moving, but I didn't think it was to the Khyber Pass.
__________________
Psalm 27:2
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-17-2024, 04:50 PM
mckenney99's Avatar
mckenney99 mckenney99 is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: OH
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 9,378
Liked 7,451 Times in 1,943 Posts
Default

For all the folks that have gotten these Lipsey's special run revolvers with problems, my suggestion would be to make Lipseys very aware of these issues. Send polite factual e-mails to Lipseys and include photos with the issues illustrated clearly. In the end, Lipseys as a distributor has more pull with S&W than a bunch of dissatisfied individuals.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-17-2024, 05:44 PM
Mercury's Avatar
Mercury Mercury is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 468
Likes: 1,056
Liked 555 Times in 213 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mckenney99 View Post
Lipseys as a distributor has more pull with S&W than a bunch of dissatisfied individuals.
That's an excellent idea, I will let them know.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 05-17-2024, 06:30 PM
ladder13's Avatar
ladder13 ladder13 is offline
SWCA Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 32,775
Likes: 67,060
Liked 58,798 Times in 18,293 Posts
Default

Sad state of affairs @S&W
__________________
I’m your Boogie Man, uh huh.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 05-17-2024, 07:34 PM
Cal44 Cal44 is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,600
Likes: 5,529
Liked 6,465 Times in 1,882 Posts
Default

Does the 38 special version of this gun have as many problems as the 32 H&R version?


Of is it better -- or worse?

Last edited by Cal44; 05-17-2024 at 07:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-17-2024, 07:49 PM
Joni_Lynn Joni_Lynn is offline
US Veteran
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I'm here, you're not
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 145
Liked 664 Times in 232 Posts
Default

I don't think it should be expected for Lipsey's to catch issues with the guns. They're a wholesaler and merely store the guns in an appropriate space until a retailer orders one or more. No one is opening boxes to examine anything.
The reports of issues with these guns has me rethinking my order for one.
No offense toward Lipsey's is intended. I'm sure they do a superb job in all other regards.
__________________
Lynnie, Professional Pest
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 05-17-2024, 07:56 PM
.220swift .220swift is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 9
Likes: 1
Liked 16 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Sadly mine is a .38. Same issues; cylinder closed poorly; jammed
upon loading; plus front sight a dud.
Sent in for repair,which was rectified and returned within 15 days.
Very happy with it now.Preforms well with accuracy.
I guess I am kinda scared with new now as a couple years ago
my 617(new) wouldn't strike cartridge in double action presentation.I am still a smith fan but am schooling myself
up on what tolerances acceptable.As quoted before;quite willing to pay premium for a stringent quality control policy.
My 686+ is a real dandy from word go.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #13  
Old 05-17-2024, 09:23 PM
psp7304 psp7304 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Reach out to Jason Cloessner at Lipsey's, [email protected]. He is the Senior VP and Product Development Manager.

I had a problem with the 642 UC I purchased. The night sight was dead and the barrel shroud was loose. I emailed Jason and he offered to expedite a shipping label back to S&W for repair or he could overnight a new 642 UC to my FFL. I opted for the new 642 UC which was at my FFL the next day. I took the original 642 UC back to my FFL so he could ship it back to Lipsey's and picked up the new one.

Jason bent over backwards to make it right and I'm sure he will help you out as well.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #14  
Old 05-17-2024, 09:27 PM
Mercury's Avatar
Mercury Mercury is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 468
Likes: 1,056
Liked 555 Times in 213 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joni_Lynn View Post
I don't think it should be expected for Lipsey's to catch issues with the guns. They're a wholesaler, No one is opening boxes to examine anything.
You make a good point Joni_Lynn, Lipsey's isn't inspecting these.

But, as was mentioned earlier, Lipsey's feedback will probably has more influence on S&W than an individual customer's would . Lipsey's needs to know how unhappy people are with the quality of the product that was made to their specifications. I did send them a message earlier this evening, let's see if they respond.

I hear that many are pleased with their guns once they have been serviced by S&W's customer service department. I know of at least one having had to send a M36 (IIRC) back a couple of times before it was replaced (which is upstanding of S&W).
I've always had good dealings with them but it was many years ago. I'm hoping that they still live up to their excellent reputation.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 05-17-2024, 09:57 PM
Baxter6551 Baxter6551 is online now
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 5,898
Liked 4,963 Times in 1,463 Posts
Default

Maybe Lipseys can start inspecting the ones they have in stock prior to shipping due to these recent issues - but as noted they would have to be made aware of the issues.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 05-17-2024, 10:02 PM
Mercury's Avatar
Mercury Mercury is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 468
Likes: 1,056
Liked 555 Times in 213 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by psp7304 View Post
Reach out to Jason Cloessner at Lipsey's, [email protected]. He is the Senior VP and Product Development Manager.

Jason bent over backwards to make it right and I'm sure he will help you out as well.
Thanks for the suggestion. I sent him an email asking for his help.
I always like it when a top level administrator gets involved with resolving an issue, they always seem to be able to cut through the red tape and make things happen.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-17-2024, 10:22 PM
Model 15-4ever Model 15-4ever is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: East Coast
Posts: 599
Likes: 1,121
Liked 1,201 Times in 365 Posts
Default

That gap is a feature, not a defect.

Since this is an Ultimate Carry, any dust bunnies (from carrying in your pocket) or unburnt powder (from super-hot buffalo-bore-style defensive loadings) - that get between the yoke and the frame cannot prevent the cylinder from closing on your speed reload.

Your finely-fitted by master-craftsman pre-MIM revolvers will get you killed on the street! You NEED this Ultimate revolver!



PS. Just got a job writing copy for the top shilling gun videos and articles

Last edited by Model 15-4ever; 05-17-2024 at 10:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #18  
Old 05-17-2024, 11:05 PM
Marshal tom Marshal tom is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cedaredge Co.
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 11
Liked 3,134 Times in 1,096 Posts
Default

I posted about this before but I ordered a 432UC and had it within a week. It has been just fine since I received it, so there are some good ones out there in spite of all the negative posts. Sorry that there have been these issues. The little gun is probably the best configured snubby to date.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #19  
Old 05-18-2024, 09:37 AM
springer springer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 6
Liked 11 Times in 6 Posts
Default

I too just purchased a 432 UC. Absolutely nothing wrong with it. Excellent finish, tight seams, bright front sight. Ran some 32 long and 32 magnums through it. Shot both just fine and to point of aim. While there are some with problems, the one I have is exactly as advertised and I'm very pleased with it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #20  
Old 05-18-2024, 09:50 AM
jcelect jcelect is offline
US Veteran
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio,USA
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 936
Liked 6,798 Times in 1,693 Posts
Default Dead front sight

For those who receive a UC gun with the front sight dead, the problem is easily solved! I have a high intensity LED flashlight that I held on the front sight for about 3 minutes and the sight no glows like it should!
jcelect
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-18-2024, 03:16 PM
Malysh's Avatar
Malysh Malysh is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central PA.
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 1,198
Liked 909 Times in 298 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Model 15-4ever View Post
That gap is a feature, not a defect.

Since this is an Ultimate Carry, any dust bunnies (from carrying in your pocket) or unburnt powder (from super-hot buffalo-bore-style defensive loadings) - that get between the yoke and the frame cannot prevent the cylinder from closing on your speed reload.

Your finely-fitted by master-craftsman pre-MIM revolvers will get you killed on the street! You NEED this Ultimate revolver!



PS. Just got a job writing copy for the top shilling gun videos and articles
I'm glad I re-read your post before I replied.
You can imagine what I was going to say!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #22  
Old 05-18-2024, 04:21 PM
shawn mccarver shawn mccarver is offline
SWCA Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 3,743
Liked 7,154 Times in 2,789 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
Shame on Lipsey's too. They should have caught this defect and never sent it out.
Do you think the distributors open boxes and inspect? When the distributors receive a shipment of hundreds of guns, the receiving department merely scans the bar code on the box which enters the serial number into their computer records. The boxes are scanned again when they are shipped out so the computerized acquisition and disposition records show the gun no longer in inventory. There are no gunsmiths inspecting the guns for defects.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #23  
Old 05-18-2024, 04:27 PM
shawn mccarver shawn mccarver is offline
SWCA Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 3,743
Liked 7,154 Times in 2,789 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baxter6551 View Post
Maybe Lipseys can start inspecting the ones they have in stock prior to shipping due to these recent issues - but as noted they would have to be made aware of the issues.
Uh, no. They are not gunsmiths. They do not know what to look for. And, how far should the inspection go? Calipers and feeler gauges, or just a quick visual? Absolutely unworkable with the volume the distributors are handling.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #24  
Old 05-18-2024, 04:34 PM
shawn mccarver shawn mccarver is offline
SWCA Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,981
Likes: 3,743
Liked 7,154 Times in 2,789 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcelect View Post
For those who receive a UC gun with the front sight dead, the problem is easily solved! I have a high intensity LED flashlight that I held on the front sight for about 3 minutes and the sight no glows like it should!
jcelect
I have never heard of tritium being "revived" in the manner you just described. The Lipsey's UC guns have tritium front sights, not phosphorescent front sights, correct?
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #25  
Old 05-18-2024, 05:42 PM
mckenney99's Avatar
mckenney99 mckenney99 is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: OH
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 9,378
Liked 7,451 Times in 1,943 Posts
Default

I believe those front sights have a large phosphorescent paint dot with a smaller Tritium ampule in the center. So if the center does not glow in the dark on its own, then the ampule was damaged on installation or the ampule had a defective seal.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #26  
Old 05-19-2024, 12:59 AM
dman7 dman7 is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: midwest
Posts: 14
Likes: 2
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Default

picked up mine today 632, same damn gap, didn't see it it at store, looked at sight in the stores bathroom, all was good

was concentrating on shroud, and how it closed as well as sight

now what, no one can do anything right today!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-19-2024, 05:42 AM
CajunBass's Avatar
CajunBass CajunBass is online now
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Chesterfield, Va.
Posts: 6,610
Likes: 9,754
Liked 14,237 Times in 3,531 Posts
Default

I saw one in the used case at my LGS the other day. Clerk told me it had belonged to a manager there who wasn't happy with something about it (He told me what but I forgot). I gave it a quick look over, and didn't see anything that jumped out at me, but I decided to pass. If it hit the used case that quickly I figure there was something I missed. Plus it was a 38. If I get one it will be a 32.
__________________
John 3:16 .
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #28  
Old 05-19-2024, 11:33 AM
jcelect jcelect is offline
US Veteran
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio,USA
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 936
Liked 6,798 Times in 1,693 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shawn mccarver View Post
I have never heard of tritium being "revived" in the manner you just described. The Lipsey's UC guns have tritium front sights, not phosphorescent front sights, correct?
Sorry, I can't explain how or why, but the flashlight worked on my 632UC!
jcelect
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-21-2024, 11:58 AM
Mercury's Avatar
Mercury Mercury is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 468
Likes: 1,056
Liked 555 Times in 213 Posts
Default Resolution: S&W's Customer Service Did the Right Thing

After sending in my unfired 432UC because of the large frame-yoke gap and the cylinder not opening or closing smoothly, they replaced the frame.

Actually, they replaced the whole gun but told me that the frame was being replaced, nothing else was mentioned. Because it had a new serial number, it had to go through my FFL but they also reimbursed me for the transfer fee. I had to inquire about it and was told to send in a receipt and they then promptly sent me a check.

Here's a picture of the new gun's frame-yoke alignment....not perfect but just about as good as we can expect nowadays.

A surprise: The B/C gap is really nice, with a snug .006 on the frame side and a loose .005 on the yoke side of the forcing cone. That's fantastic considering that .012 is reported to be the new factory limit.

The trigger pull is smooth and averaged a little over 8 1/2 lbs and has seemed to improve with dry firing and limited live firing. (I have to find where I stashed the rest of my .32 ammo.)

I've also included a photo of a target of some of the first rounds. They were shot at 7yds with the factory VZ grips, which feel good in the hand but I had to concentrate to keep the rounds centered.
I changed them out with some combat grips and much prefer them to the VZ. I think that I will use standard stocks with a Tyler-T and carry it with those.

It's a shame that the original gun made it out of the factory in the first place but S&W's customer service made it easy to send it in and they replaced it in about a month, without any push back and on the first go around. I would say that they made it as smooth of an experience as possible.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Replaced 432UC.jpg (95.6 KB, 163 views)
File Type: jpg 432UC Target First Shots.jpg (87.9 KB, 134 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #30  
Old 07-21-2024, 04:04 PM
slabside2's Avatar
slabside2 slabside2 is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: glen mills pa. USA
Posts: 802
Likes: 958
Liked 603 Times in 250 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SnidelyWhiplash View Post
That should never had gotten past the assembler or the inspector. Heads should roll over such obviously poor quality control.
Assembler not gunsmith there’s your answer.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #31  
Old 07-21-2024, 07:40 PM
seldon14 seldon14 is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 488
Likes: 165
Liked 465 Times in 230 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcelect View Post
Sorry, I can't explain how or why, but the flashlight worked on my 632UC!
jcelect

See this post from above. If it has no glow after being in complete darkness you have a bad/broken tritium insert. The light just charged the luminescent ring. This front sight is wonderful combo of features, but make sure yours is working to its full potential.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mckenney99 View Post
I believe those front sights have a large phosphorescent paint dot with a smaller Tritium ampule in the center. So if the center does not glow in the dark on its own, then the ampule was damaged on installation or the ampule had a defective seal.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #32  
Old 07-22-2024, 06:28 AM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 26,074
Liked 14,596 Times in 6,508 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slabside2 View Post
Assembler not gunsmith there’s your answer.
Although MIM and CNC machined parts produce very uniform parts, it still takes more skill to properly assemble a revolver than it does to assemble a striker fired pistol.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #33  
Old 09-24-2024, 12:32 AM
ShotPlacement ShotPlacement is offline
Member
Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29 Yet Another Disappointing 432UC ** UPDATE-See Post #29  
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 23
Likes: 37
Liked 21 Times in 14 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by psp7304 View Post
Reach out to Jason Cloessner at Lipsey's, [email protected]. He is the Senior VP and Product Development Manager.

I had a problem with the 642 UC I purchased. The night sight was dead and the barrel shroud was loose. I emailed Jason and he offered to expedite a shipping label back to S&W for repair or he could overnight a new 642 UC to my FFL. I opted for the new 642 UC which was at my FFL the next day. I took the original 642 UC back to my FFL so he could ship it back to Lipsey's and picked up the new one.

Jason bent over backwards to make it right and I'm sure he will help you out as well.
I just emailed Jason with my story. I'll report back after I hear from him.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lipseys 432UC , Going back :( Mountain Man S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 62 05-13-2024 09:34 AM
432UC / 632UC 6 round .32 Speedloader wesshipman S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 5 04-22-2024 10:13 AM
Well, that was disappointing PeterJ Ammo 12 07-31-2019 06:07 PM
New 617, Disappointing! captainwayne S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 73 04-15-2017 06:15 AM
Another disappointing LGS.... Old Corp Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 20 08-28-2016 10:47 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 AM.


© 2000-2025 smith-wessonforum.com All rights reserved worldwide.
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)