Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-16-2024, 12:57 PM
Pizza Bob's Avatar
Pizza Bob Pizza Bob is offline
SWCA Member
296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 448
Liked 6,157 Times in 1,597 Posts
Default 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition

It was my understanding that the "200 gr Max Bullet Weight" etched on the barrel underlug was due to possible bullet-pull under recoil for the heavier bullets. Is this correct?

Adios,

Pizza Bob
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2024, 01:21 PM
CH4's Avatar
CH4 CH4 is offline
Member
296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Nevada
Posts: 11,746
Likes: 19,980
Liked 28,344 Times in 7,850 Posts
Default

You are correct. Same goes for the 396
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_9926.jpg (195.9 KB, 30 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0114.jpg (121.8 KB, 30 views)
__________________
213th FBINA

Last edited by CH4; 11-16-2024 at 01:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 11-17-2024, 03:07 AM
BLUEDOT37's Avatar
BLUEDOT37 BLUEDOT37 is offline
Member
296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 6,141
Liked 9,926 Times in 3,663 Posts
Default

Brian Pearce said in Handloader Magazine #293 that S&W stopped adding that warning because they found that properly loaded 44 Spcl. ammo, no matter what the bullet weight was, didn't have that problem after all.

My 396NG does not have that warning.

.



.
.



.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day

Last edited by BLUEDOT37; 11-17-2024 at 03:16 AM. Reason: .
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 11-17-2024, 10:48 AM
steelslaver's Avatar
steelslaver steelslaver is offline
US Veteran
296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition  
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 14,840
Likes: 14,609
Liked 43,942 Times in 11,025 Posts
Default

I have a 396 and a 296 and I think the bullet weight limit was as much for your hand as it was for bullet jump.

Same goes for my 2 325s.

If you shoot any of the big bore alloy guns with wood stocks and no gloves you are a true masochist. I got some big mitt that have lived a life of labor and a 230gr 45 acp in an 325 with wood grips give me more painful sting than I want.

Last edited by steelslaver; 11-17-2024 at 12:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 11-17-2024, 09:42 PM
71vette 71vette is offline
Member
296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 378
Likes: 912
Liked 1,000 Times in 200 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steelslaver View Post
I have a 396 and a 296 and I think the bullet weight limit was as much for your hand as it was for bullet jump.

Same goes for my 2 325s.

If you shoot any of the big bore alloy guns with wood stocks and no gloves you are a true masochist. I got some big mitt that have lived a life of labor and a 230gr 45 acp in an 325 with wood grips give me more painful sting than I want.
This! I had some nice Ahrends cocobolo combats on my 325NG. They lasted one range trip. It’s got the factory Pachmyers on it again. Even 200 grain SWC’s were unpleasant.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-17-2024, 09:47 PM
CH4's Avatar
CH4 CH4 is offline
Member
296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Nevada
Posts: 11,746
Likes: 19,980
Liked 28,344 Times in 7,850 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71vette View Post
This! I had some nice Ahrends cocobolo combats on my 325NG. They lasted one range trip. It’s got the factory Pachmyers on it again. Even 200 grain SWC’s were unpleasant.
Same with the 329
Don’t know what Smith was thinking when they shipped em with Ahrends.
__________________
213th FBINA
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 11-17-2024, 10:58 PM
housedog's Avatar
housedog housedog is offline
Member
296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central Alabama
Posts: 40
Likes: 134
Liked 29 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Lost River Ammunition Co. loads a 185gr hardcast full wadcutter in a .44 Russian case and it is the first commercial round I have found that I am confident I can manage the recoil well enough to make a good quick follow up shot from my 296. About 750 fps from that platform.

I can stand shooting some of the commercial 200gr JHP stuff like the Gold Dots, but getting back on target quickly is out of the question for me.

I will not carry my own handloads.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-18-2024, 11:45 AM
tgmr05 tgmr05 is offline
Member
296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 160
Likes: 10
Liked 132 Times in 63 Posts
Default

As others mentioned, the 200gr limit was removed during the short production run. I have used 240 swc and xtp without difficulties in handloads. Factory 240 was ok, too.

It can definitely smack you around as it is a lightweight revolver, and the scandium/titanium can handle more than powder puff loads. Reloading allows one to find a balance that may not be available with factory loads.

Reloads are what I carry most of the time, but I use the 296 mostly when in the outdoors, not around town. There are some good factory 44 special rounds if one either does not reload or simply feels best to stick with factory loads for carry. May be hard to find all the time, though. Some factory options I liked are no longer made…
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-18-2024, 11:00 PM
BLUEDOT37's Avatar
BLUEDOT37 BLUEDOT37 is offline
Member
296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 6,141
Liked 9,926 Times in 3,663 Posts
Default

I don't think comparing factory 44 Special loads to factory 45ACP loads is a fair one.

SAAMI 44 Special max pressure is only 15.5k psi.

SAAMI 45ACP max pressure is 21k psi while 45ACP (+P) is 23k psi.

That makes a big difference in energy when comparing the same bullet weights.

The .44 bullets have cannelures/crimp grooves which aid in holding the bullet in place.

45ACP bullets, like other auto bullets, don't have them & rely on case-bullet tension only to avoid jump crimp.

Hot loads in lightweight 45ACP revolvers will definitely jump crimp.

I do have some hot handloads for my 396NG but I stick to lightweight bullets (180 or 200gr) in them.

LOL, there's not many revolvers I can handle, recoil-wise, nowadays with wood grips. My hands aren't tuff enough anymore.

Wood grips are just for show.

.



.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-20-2024, 05:35 PM
F224 F224 is offline
Member
296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas, Iowa, USA
Posts: 297
Likes: 203
Liked 380 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Ive had both a M696, and a 396 Nightguard, and now shoot a 4" M69. From an accuracy standpoint, they all like 180-200gr bullets at around 800-900 fps.

The Nightguard really liked the 200gr Blaser Gold Dot and it is easy to get quick followup shots with. Between my brother and I we have about 1200 rounds of the stuff laying around. It's great for carry ammo and very reasonably priced when you can find it.
__________________
Captain Dave Funk
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-20-2024, 05:52 PM
CH4's Avatar
CH4 CH4 is offline
Member
296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Nevada
Posts: 11,746
Likes: 19,980
Liked 28,344 Times in 7,850 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by F224 View Post
Ive had both a M696, and a 396 Nightguard, and now shoot a 4" M69. From an accuracy standpoint, they all like 180-200gr bullets at around 800-900 fps.

The Nightguard really liked the 200gr Blaser Gold Dot and it is easy to get quick followup shots with. Between my brother and I we have about 1200 rounds of the stuff laying around. It's great for carry ammo and very reasonably priced when you can find it.
Did you try any heavier bullets?
__________________
213th FBINA
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-21-2024, 04:09 PM
F224 F224 is offline
Member
296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition 296 Centennial / Bullet Weight Prohibition  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas, Iowa, USA
Posts: 297
Likes: 203
Liked 380 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CH4 View Post
Did you try any heavier bullets?
Yes; 240gr Gr XTP at 1000 fps, you know you touched off a lot of power with that load.

For the M69, I am shooting the heavier 260-280gr bullets at 950-1000fps. Incredible penetration with quick followup shots.
__________________
Captain Dave Funk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
7 shot 38 Centennial Air Weight L Frame joespapa S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 8 05-20-2023 10:46 AM
Best bullet weight? Jessie Smith & Wesson M&P10 Rifles 12 09-30-2013 03:24 PM
Published bullet weight vs. actual bullet weight safearm Reloading 29 03-26-2013 05:45 AM
Pre Model 42 Centennial Air weight I got it! mbliss57 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 17 08-26-2012 09:44 AM
Bullet weight vs Pistol weight oldracer Reloading 13 01-21-2010 03:13 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:00 AM.


© 2000-2025 smith-wessonforum.com All rights reserved worldwide.
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)