|
|
 |
01-12-2025, 11:47 PM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 259
Liked 1,811 Times in 520 Posts
|
|
642 vs 442 : Differences
Delete. I should have used the search feature. Been asked and answered well previously?
Last edited by flundertaker; 01-13-2025 at 12:13 AM.
Reason: Pls delete.
|
01-13-2025, 12:09 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 763
Likes: 37
Liked 834 Times in 350 Posts
|
|
Ones black and ones silver. Just kidding.
The steel parts on the 442 are carbon steel, and it has an overall black finish.
The steel parts on the 642 are stainless and it has an overall brushed stainless look. The anodized parts are finished to look stainless.
|
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-13-2025, 12:17 AM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 11,494
Liked 2,291 Times in 844 Posts
|
|
I believe on the M442 the cylinder is carbon steel and the barrel is stainless steel (the best of both worlds IMHO). I preferred a subdued finish on my self-defense firearms so I went with the M442-2 (No Lock). There’s just nothing to not like about that little revolver.
|
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-13-2025, 08:16 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: NJ
Posts: 79
Likes: 1
Liked 97 Times in 41 Posts
|
|
I think the "pro" series are moon clip ready. I didn't know that when i got my 442.
|
01-13-2025, 10:48 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. Ohio
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 9,889
Liked 2,850 Times in 1,042 Posts
|
|
I’ve found that the finish on my 442 holds up better.
__________________
Two Handguns every day
|
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 AM.
Linear Mode
