Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 08-29-2009, 11:39 PM
danbrew danbrew is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Scandium revolvers & frame damage?

I’ve been on a jihad for S&W revolvers in the last year or so and have been buying the Scandium frame guns and have noticed a bit of a “dig” on the front on the frame, near the yolk where the crane swings shut. My terminology probably sucks, but I’ve got loads of pictures – and you know what they say about pictures.

See the area underneath the barrel that looks “shaved”. My question is this – is this normal/typical with the Scandium guns? I’m shooting commercial loads for the designed caliber – these are all, for the most part, big bore magnum guns. A little surprised, to be honest, that I’m getting what looks like unintended wear on the frames.


Original image: http://danbrew.smugmug.com/photos/633976705_b7qd8-O.jpg
329PD .44 Magnum.
Shot mostly 240g magnum rounds, a handful of > or < bullet weights. Probably less than 500 rounds.


Original image: http://danbrew.smugmug.com/photos/633976819_boFek-O.jpg
327 PC .357 Magnum
Shot less than 100 rds of 185g magnum rounds. About 100 .38 rounds. No more than 200 rounds.


Original image: http://danbrew.smugmug.com/photos/633976961_9yYV7-O.jpg
329 Night Guard .44 Magnum
Probably 500 rounds or so. Mostly 240g. Maybe 100 of those 500 were .44 Special loads.


Original image: http://danbrew.smugmug.com/photos/633977123_GmmSo-O.jpg
325 Night Guard .45 ACP
500 rounds. All 230g


Original image: http://danbrew.smugmug.com/photos/633977352_CFjN7-O.jpg
Model 37 from sometime in the 80s. Not a Scandium gun, instead an aluminum alloy airweight. Similar issues, but not nearly as pronounced as the Scandium guns. Although I’ve had this gun forever for almost 30 years, I haven’t shot much through it – backup gun for years. Probably less than 200 rounds through it.


Original image: http://danbrew.smugmug.com/photos/633977467_hcZR7-O.jpg
A model 640 .357 stainless steel. Note that blast residue in the same area on this stainless steel frame. A few hundred rounds through this one. Had for years.


Original image: http://danbrew.smugmug.com/photos/633977606_GASTd-O.jpg
Model 629 stainless steel. Pretty much the same as above – about 500 rounds through this one. Mostly magnum rounds.

So… do I need to be worried about the wear on the Scandium guns? It seems pretty clear that this area is a “blast area” in S&W revolvers, yet it looks as if the Scandium (and Aluminum) versions don’t stand up so well to the expected consequences of a .357, .44, or .45 rounds. What’s up with that?

Comments pro/con, thoughts appreciated. ☺
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
 

Tags
327, 44 magnum, 629, 640, 642, 686, airweight, ccw, commercial, extractor, glock, model 625, scandium, surefire, tactical


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Show us your Scandium framed revolvers BLUEDOT37 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 111 08-18-2021 07:49 PM
Are My scandium framed revolvers less durable? dan-g S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 32 02-10-2020 10:30 AM
Scandium revolvers from S&W Lee's Landing Billy S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 36 06-19-2015 08:05 AM
Why are all new M&P Revolvers Scandium-framed? waco kid S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 3 07-17-2011 09:55 PM
Scandium/Titanium Revolvers - Failures? Slyk54 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 8 09-24-2009 05:22 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)