|
 |

05-23-2016, 11:20 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Frostbite Falls
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 100
Liked 834 Times in 321 Posts
|
|
Feeler gauges for S&W revolvers
I am constantly amazed when I go to buy a revolver or analyze problems how little the collector or accumulator know about checking certain critical items on a revolver. I routinely ask sellers about Barrel/cylinder gap and point out that they can measure that with feeler gauges. More often than not I get some reply that says well I can see through it so it can be much or offers to check it with pieces of paper. Very few people have any idea of how to measure it nor do they have the tool to do so. You should know what it is and also have the appropriate tool to check the guns you want to purchase. Just for the record...back in the 70's and 80's the BC gap should run from .004 to .010. Then more recently, probably coinciding with the lock guns the spec was raised to max out at .012. You should know that you can make it wider but short of dismounting the barrel and do lathe turning there is no way to reduce the gap. When turning a barrel back the extractor rod must also be shortened the appropriate amount. That's why gauges are so important. Do you really want to spend your coin on a gun with a BC gap of .014 and put up with the poor accuracy that goes with it and the spitting lead that will be felt? I doubt it.
Here are 4 sets of gauges, and they include the ones from the S&W armorers kit, a set of spark plug wire gauges that are totally unacceptable, a set of flat feeler gauges that include all that one needs, and lastly a set of bent feeler gauges which would be find except they don't go small enough. If one buys flat feeler gauges buy a set that includes .004 through .010 and if you have one of the newer guns also get .011 and .012.
Factory gauges from the S&W Revolver armorers kit circa 1987. I think these need help as the give the extremes but nothing in between. Saving grace is they are narrow enough to work with J frames.
A set of automotive wire gauges that are great for spark plugs and cars but simply don't go small enough for revolvers.
A set of flat feeler gauges. They work great except for being too wide to work on J frames. Since I don't do much work on J's and have the factory armorers gauges I don't worry about it. If I ever do spend a lot of time working on J's I'll have to buy a set of these with the idea of cutting them down.
A set of bent feeler gauges that are fine for cars but don't go small enough for revolvers.
By the way when measuring, be sure to measure from both sides. BC gap is cut with a barrette file by hand and the gap is usually somewhat off, one side to the other which is not a big deal unless one side exceeds spec.
Last edited by flintsghost; 05-23-2016 at 11:22 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

05-23-2016, 11:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 608
Likes: 2,918
Liked 482 Times in 264 Posts
|
|
I also use automotive feeler gauges. Bend and/or cut down as necessary. If a burr is left after cutting them down, a light touch with a fine stone will remove it.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

05-24-2016, 10:31 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19,263
Likes: 9,362
Liked 30,169 Times in 9,773 Posts
|
|
I've got a dozen or so different feeler gauges (Automotive, Machinists, Specialty, etc.) but years ago I bought a few Starrett Shim Stock Sets that have feeler gauge stock ranging from .0015 to .100 that allow the making of my own gauges in sizes and shapes I need for specific needs. They come in 12" lengths and are about 3/4" wide and you can even carry a few custom cut strips in your wallet for attending gun shows or just in case you run into a gun that needs to be gauged.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

05-27-2016, 09:39 AM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 456
Likes: 1,255
Liked 1,151 Times in 204 Posts
|
|
Good information. After talking to you on the phone, I went out and bought myself a set. Its an inexpensive tool to put on the gun shelf.
__________________
Hank
SWCA 2945
|

05-27-2016, 11:47 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SE Kansas
Posts: 664
Likes: 6
Liked 177 Times in 112 Posts
|
|
("You should know that you can make it wider but short of dismounting the barrel and do lathe turning there is no way to reduce the gap.")
Not exactly true. If the gap needs to be reduced a few thousands (up to about .005), you can install a yoke washer, which are available from TriggerShims Brand Shim Kits
These work well with the S&W's that use the spring loaded yoke retainer screw, will have to do a little fitting with the older Smiths.
I have never ran into any problems with excessive space at the recoil shield, as long as you are talking no more than .005"
|

05-28-2016, 10:35 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Frostbite Falls
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 100
Liked 834 Times in 321 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by retired2006
("You should know that you can make it wider but short of dismounting the barrel and do lathe turning there is no way to reduce the gap.")
Not exactly true. If the gap needs to be reduced a few thousands (up to about .005), you can install a yoke washer, which are available from TriggerShims Brand Shim Kits
These work well with the S&W's that use the spring loaded yoke retainer screw, will have to do a little fitting with the older Smiths.
I have never ran into any problems with excessive space at the recoil shield, as long as you are talking no more than .005"
|
Increasing the space between the back of the cylinder and the recoil plate is a bad idea. That's called headspace and in that regard .005 that you mention is a lot of headspace. Excessive headspace can lead to damage and injury. The barrel turning idea is much better and proper way to deal with excessive BC gap.
|

05-28-2016, 12:14 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,566
Likes: 5,443
Liked 2,923 Times in 1,222 Posts
|
|
Thumbs up on feeler gauges. On the other hand they tend to just confirm what my eyes tell me, either the barrel-cylinder gap is okay or it's not okay. Some other tools and lights are also helpful when evaluating a revolver.
__________________
Scoundrel & Ne'er-Do-Well
|

06-05-2016, 05:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 36
Likes: 44
Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
A go-no go headspace gauge and feeler gauges are very useful things to have around. They are literally lifesavers for a revolver toter. The expanded, fifth edition of Jerry Kuhnhausen’s S&W revolver shop manual is handy, as well.
|

06-05-2016, 06:42 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northeast FL
Posts: 6,166
Likes: 7,906
Liked 16,668 Times in 4,019 Posts
|
|
If you don't have feeler gages, keep in mind that plain copier paper is pretty reliably .004" of an inch thick, so one slice should go, two, maybe, three, no....
__________________
Robert
SWCA #2906, SWHF #760
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

06-05-2016, 07:44 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Frostbite Falls
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 100
Liked 834 Times in 321 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by raljr1
If you don't have feeler gages, keep in mind that plain copier paper is pretty reliably .004" of an inch thick, so one slice should go, two, maybe, three, no....
|
The drawback to paper is that the fibers tend to crush down so that while you may think it is one thing it could be thinner. Also copier papers and other types come is so many differents weights that getting .004 reliably is not really something that one should depend on. Using calipers it is almost impossible to measure it reliably due to the crush.
|

06-05-2016, 08:05 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northeast FL
Posts: 6,166
Likes: 7,906
Liked 16,668 Times in 4,019 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flintsghost
The drawback to paper is that the fibers tend to crush down so that while you may think it is one thing it could be thinner. Also copier papers and other types come is so many differents weights that getting .004 reliably is not really something that one should depend on. Using calipers it is almost impossible to measure it reliably due to the crush.
|
NO argument here, just in a pinch, McGiver style, you know.
__________________
Robert
SWCA #2906, SWHF #760
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|