How common is it For newer Smith Revolvers to have canted barrels?

H

hassiman

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
131
Reaction score
65
I have been reading that it's not that uncommon with the newer S&W revolvers to find examples with barrels that are canted IE not in perfect aligment with the flat top of the frame. This causing the front sight to not be in proper alignment with the rear sight.
I serm to remember that the ribbing across the top of the M29's reciever was carried all the way down to where it was joined withe the barrel thus making it easy to see if the barrel to frame allignment was correct. I was examining my new 629-6 and realized it's not an easy task to determine if the alignment is perfect.
Has anyone else seen this issue with the newer S&W revolvers?
 
I bought a new gun in Jan. and a new one in Feb. Both are good. They shoot great and look excellent.
 
Lots of them are off a little bit. To me, it seems easier to tell just by looking, if you open the cylinder and look from the front sight to the rear sight. In the shop, I put them in the mill vise and use a square from the mill table to the grip frame. It's an easy fix if you have a frame wrench to just tweak it a bit and bring it in line.
 
I don't own any new Smiths (newest one is from 1994) but I have sure seen a lot here complaining about canted barrels on new production guns. The only thing I can say from my experience is that it seems to be a more common place problem these days.
 
It's difficult to say. You won't hear about the straight ones but reports of canted barrels now move at terabyte speeds and are disseminated all over the Internet. Without knowing the true number of defects and the total production numbers, it is entirely possible the incidence is exactly the same as it has been historically.

Your best defense, of course, is to be able to examine any gun (new or used) before buying.
 
Put things in the proper prospective: a dozen people, heck make it two dozen, complaining here separately or together would seem like a lot, especially if they did it repeatedly in different threads. Yet a 12 or 24 people out of thousands of guns doesn't seem like an epidemic to me. :D
 
Last edited:
The times I've heard of this flaw it was associated specifically with particular runs on particular limited run limited models. ( Read: very isolated instances) I can tell you that I've handled maybe 50-60 new S&W revolvers in the last year or so and never come across one. In fact, in 30+ years of collecting, I've only seen it one once and that was on another brand.
 
Last edited:
Sent my new M29 in for crown repair (had a horrible crown finish) and came back with the barrel now canted to the left! Not much but visible. Am going to shoot it tonight and see what happens. Don't want to send it back again. Took a month to have it returned to me the first time.
 
Last edited:
A slight cant has been acceptable as for as long as S&W has been in business. Colt was the same, even for the holy Python. It was hard to spot with round barrels, easier with a rib that can be compared to serrations on the top strap or rear sight. I bought my first S&W with a slightly canted barrel about 1975. I shot great. That's the test. It is better to use your revolvers to develop your marksmanship than your ability to type bitchy trivia for the internet.

By the way, most get their cant from screwing them in past top dead center to get enough torque so they'll stay put. Adjusting them back to straight up risks breaking them loose. While you likely would get away with that many times it is done at the risk of having to set the barrel back a revolution.
 
Last edited:
My 986 Pro Series went back twice before it was corrected. It was very noticable. I talked with a customer service member and he said S&W allows 6degrees cant and it will ship. Here's a question.....was there ever a problem with the "pinned" barrels?
 
Let's just say......

.....that you hear about canted barrels frequently here. Of course we hear more about the ones that are perfect and great shooters.

Somewhere I came across the spec that +/- 5 degrees was allowable. So a little cant is in spec.
 
Last edited:
I have a Brand New Model 60 and the Barrel is canted to the left and the sights are off. I sent my back to SW this morning!
 
Cobbler said:
My 986 Pro Series went back twice before it was corrected. It was very noticable. I talked with a customer service member and he said S&W allows 6degrees cant and it will ship. Here's a question.....was there ever a problem with the "pinned" barrels?
Click to expand...
I already wrote that I bought my first S&W with a slightly canted barrel in 1975. The revolver was made in the early 1950s. Also I bought a new S&W with a little cant later in the 1970s. The forum's owner has written that they occurred with about the same incidence for as long as S&W has been making hand ejectors.

Pinned barrels were installed exactly the same as later non-pinned one piece barrels. The slot across the barrel threads was cut generously enough for the pins to pass through after installing random barrels on random frames. Most pins do not touch the barrel, only the frame. S&W's barrel pins can only stop gross rotation of a loose barrel. The pins were never anything more than a sales gimmick.

Since the sleeves or shrouds around modern "to piece barrels" are keyed into the front of the frame they are probably the least likely to show any cant.
 
k22fan said:
Since the sleeves or shrouds around modern "to piece barrels" are keyed into the front of the frame they are probably the least likely to show any cant.
Click to expand...
Personally I think the two piece is a great design. I had it on a Dan Wesson I bought back in the late 70's. I would like to see them all like this design. Do you feel it is a worthy design?
 
Cobbler said:
Personally I think the two piece is a great design. I had it on a Dan Wesson I bought back in the late 70's. I would like to see them all like this design. Do you feel it is a worthy design?
Click to expand...
It is a good thing that you asked what I "feel" rather than what I know. A tiny percentage of members here think the two piece barrel revolvers are the most accurate revolvers S&W has ever made. Their logic is that the barrels are under tension the same as Dan Wesson's and Dan Wessons were spectacular performers in 220 meter silhouette competition. A couple of members have demonstrated that accuracy off the bench. I have not shot my two piece barrel S&Ws off the bench nor have I concentrated on getting the tiniest groups out of my guns in so long that I can not back up or refute that claim.

There are draw backs to S&W's two piece barrels. It is not hard to find a local gunsmith who can replace one piece barrels. Some times the older barrels are temporarily removed to mill a dove tail for a preferred front sight or shorten them in a lathe. That kind of work is impractical on two piece barrels. As a practical matter replacing two piece barrels is a factory only job. The actual barrel is tightened with a wrench that is the mirror image of the rifling. After tightening the muzzle is counter bored to remove the rifling damaged by the wrench.

One piece barrels are my first choice. However, Model 69s and X frames were never made with one piece barrels and when the Model 66-8 was given a two piece barrel it was also redesigned to eliminate forcing cone cracking. Those revolvers are worthy designs.
 
Last edited:
hassiman said:
I have been reading that it's not that uncommon with the newer S&W revolvers to find examples with barrels that are canted IE not in perfect aligment with the flat top of the frame. This causing the front sight to not be in proper alignment with the rear sight.
I serm to remember that the ribbing across the top of the M29's reciever was carried all the way down to where it was joined withe the barrel thus making it easy to see if the barrel to frame allignment was correct. I was examining my new 629-6 and realized it's not an easy task to determine if the alignment is perfect.
Has anyone else seen this issue with the newer S&W revolvers?
Click to expand...
Yes. I got a new 686 - 6 in Jan , 2018. I noticed the front sight was a little off and slanted down slightly on the left side. The dealer said I must be seeing things when he looked at it. Shortly after that I noticed the canted barrel. I showed it to and after trying to bull**** me said that yes I was right but it doesn't affect the accuracy. As a first time gun owner I just let it slide but , I did pay $745.00 for it.I expect better. Suggestions?
Never been fired.
 
I suspect this is one of the major reasons for the two-piece barrel design.

To be more specific, the skilled labor required to install a barrel correctly was the reason; the two-piece design is the solution.
 
I have two such S&W guns . One is a 649-2 and the other a 28-2. On the 28-2, the bbl goes off to the right and is quite noticeable. I adjusted the sights to compensate and the gun now shoots dead on. I have Crimson Trace grips on the 649-2. The canting on both now is a non problem for me.
 
I've seen a couple of guns where the barrels were far enough off dead center to be noticeable. I have an 8 3/8 pre 27 with an S95xxx serial number that is a little off but it requires only a few clicks of adjustment of the rear sight to correct.. I think it would be more trouble than it's worth to try to correct it. I think 6 degrees would be noticeable. I you can't get a good square sight picture due to a canted sight, it would have to be fixed!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
how to install stock medallions
Replies
13
Views
702
Greymann
G
B
Organizing parts for revolvers
Replies
9
Views
572
chief38
chief38
D
How deep is the laser etching
Replies
3
Views
524
DeanD
D
D
Jammed up Smith Revolver.....
2 3
Replies
44
Views
2K
AlHunt
A
8shot
Aftermarket barrels for the S&W 617?
Replies
11
Views
687
8shot
8shot

Latest posts

Back
Top