Model 24 magnum conversion?

The two most sensible answers do not actually answer notsofast's questions. The first is trade his Model 24 for a .44 Magnum. That's been well covered. The second is reload. In that Model 24 .44 Specials can launch 240 grain bullets within a couple hundred fps of factory .44 Magnum cartridges. That's certainly plenty for deer. They produce all the recoil I want. Wimps like me do not enjoy firing standard .44 Magnum cartridges in Mountain Guns that have essentially the same recoil as his converted Model 24 would.

If he's never going to reload and local laws make trading guns not feasible then we look at his original questions. A longer cylinder would not be needed to fire industry standard .44 Magnum factory cartridges. The SAAMI's .44 Special maximum cartridge over all length is 0.005" longer than .44 Magnum. The Model 24's cylinder's chambers could be reamed with a .44 Magnum reamer. That would avoid buying a cylinder. It would avoid working on his yoke for end shake, his barrel for flash gap and his ratchet for carry up or timing. Additionally it would avoid having a cylinder with a different shade of blue than the rest of the revolver. Wouldn't that be the least expensive way to do what he wants?
I don’t reload, I would be using commonly sold rounds, Remington, Winchester, Fioochi, in both magnum and special. I do not yet know what SAAMI means and/or its relevance for my project, any explanation would be helpful for me. And yes reaming a cylinder would be preferable to barrel shortening, forcing cone re-cutting and of course buying a mag cylinder. The gun is a -6
 
The only way to have a "convertible" 44 Spec/44Mag would be to start with the Mod 29 and have a 44 Special cylinder on the Mag length made up. A pretty expensive proposition. Cost wise, buy both guns and pocket the change.
 
SAAMI is the initials of the Small Arms And Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute, SAAMI. They set the cartridge and chamber dimensions and cartridge pressures that all large U.S. manufacturers voluntarily adhere to. This way all the large manufacturers' firearms can safely fire all the large ammunition manufacturer's cartridges.

Except for specialty cartridges from small boutique ammunition manufacturers the .44 Magnum cylinders' longer length only benefits reloaders. The extra length allows us to use bullet molds with longer noses, to load heavier bullets, and to seat bullets out to increase the volume of the powder space.

I used SAAMI because most members expect statements to be backed up by a respected source.
 
Last edited:
notsofast,

As K22fan posted, SAAMI also sets standard pressure for cartridges:

44 Spl is rated at 15,500 PSI (pounds per square inch) and guns manufactured in 44 spl are designed to safely withstand that pressure.

44 Mag is 36,000 PSI and therefore guns manufactured in 44 Mag are designed to safely withstand that pressure.

You're prosposing to convert to and shoot 44 Mag in a gun designed for 44 spl pressure. That we know for sure. What we don't know for sure, is what the Model 24 is heat treated for beyond 44 spl.

However, some years ago some Model 624s 44 spl with 3" barrels left the factory with cyls that had chambers long enough to accept 44 Mag cartridges. S&W spent an awful lot of money on a recall to get those guns back and correct the problem.
 
Last edited:
The 24-6 probably has a longer cylinder than the earlier 24s. You should try a fired .44Mag case to see if it will fit.
 
"According to S&W, they are all the same after WWII. I've called and asked."

That doesn't hold water right off the bat. When the .44 Magnum was developed in the 1950s, S&W used different heat treating. Plus, depending on who you talk to, factory employees are notorious for giving bad information.

I have a M544, a 5" .44-40. I asked Roy Jinks, the historian and former head of the handgun production, if it was safe to fit a .44 Magnum cylinder. Mr Jinks said no, the heat treatment was different on the non magnum frames.
 
I can't see converting a .44 spl to a mag. A model 24 is a sturdy frame which means it can shoot some respectable loads which will do much of what a mag can. A .44 spl at 1100 fps is quite respectable

If you don't reload sell the model 24, there are people out there that wish they had one. Then buy a model 29 and you'll be further ahead.

I'm a fan of both the spl and mag but prefer the spl now that I'm older. To be honest I own 3 .44 magnum S&W revolvers, not one has ever seen a mag load. For my shooting the atomic loads just aren't needed.
 
"According to S&W, they are all the same after WWII. I've called and asked."

That doesn't hold water right off the bat. When the .44 Magnum was developed in the 1950s, S&W used different heat treating. Plus, depending on who you talk to, factory employees are notorious for giving bad information.

I have a M544, a 5" .44-40. I asked Roy Jinks, the historian and former head of the handgun production, if it was safe to fit a .44 Magnum cylinder. Mr Jinks said no, the heat treatment was different on the non magnum frames.

True on all counts.

For example:

• Heat treatment was eliminated by order Oct. 12, 1945 for cylinders on the & .32 ‘I’ frames, K22, K32 & K38, and the 44 Spl & 45 N frames: S&W 1857 – 1945. And the .357 continued to have heat treatment as well as all subsequent magnum cartridge models.

Who knows what changes S&W has undertaken in the subsequent 73 years. Not only will we not get specific information from their CS people that answer the phone, but those who do know the specifics are extremely unlikely permitted to divulge those trade secrets.

So we are left with only two definitively conclusive alternatives:

1. Have the revolvers privately and expensively lab tested for confirmation of strength,

2. or follow S&W's directions supplied with every gun; use only the specified ammunition. Which does not include shooting 44 mag in a 44 special revolver.
 
Last edited:
It is possible to reload the .44 Special case to near-.44 Magnum performance levels. In fact that is exactly what Elmer Keith did during the period leading up to the production of the .44 Magnum (using 2400 powder). You can say much the same about loading a .38 Special case to near-.357 Magnum performance levels. So if you reload and simply have to have more power than the standard .44 Special loads provide (I can't say why), it is easily obtained in the .44 Special case without doing anything to the gun. Metallurgically, I can't say if that is safe or not for your Model 24. Personally, I am one of those who shoots normal .44 Special-level handloads in my .44 Magnum revolvers.
 
Last edited:
Us ol gun cranks do all sorts of things........

S_W_44_Spl_Mag_IMG_1241.jpg




** I once owned an early 6 1/2" 44 Spl. (box marked 24-3)
frame was stamped 29-3 packin a 44 special barrel & cylinder.


.
 
Last edited:
Can a model 24, 44spcl be converted to a 44mag? If it can how much is involved? Thanks

A model 29-3 cylinder will work best....
Barrel butt will need to be adjusted for gap and the lead in the forcing cone re-cut.

As far as heat treatment goes...
It'll take quite a few magnum round to stretch the frame out of spec as to head space and barrel/cyl. gap.

We all know the 44 mag factory ammo of today is not the 44 magnum ammunition of the 50's.

What with all that said, I'd load my own 44 Special with the old Keith load,
or the Buffalo Bore Heavy 44 Spl loading and just roll with that as is.

Not a big deal.

.
 
Just FYI:

With a drill you can drill and with a mill you can mill.
But with a vehicle, you don't vehicle, you drive it.

Work done on a lath is not "lathed".

The circumference of the work piece is TURNED DOWN.
The end of the work piece is FACED OFF.

The barrel throat therefore would need to be faced off.

A piece of lath and a lathe are not the same thing. FYI :D
 
Us ol gun cranks do all sorts of things........

S_W_44_Spl_Mag_IMG_1241.jpg




** I once owned an early 6 1/2" 44 Spl. (box marked 24-3)
frame was stamped 29-3 packin a 44 special barrel & cylinder.


.

I very much like that!!!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top