I'm sorry, but shooting an animal that's not threatening you or that you don't intend to eat is - well - wrong.
You must live in a city.
I'm sorry, but shooting an animal that's not threatening you or that you don't intend to eat is - well - wrong.
dont forget squirrel. you want to talk about destructive creatures. these things gnaw on EVERYTHING.
My dog got attacked by a coyote and it cost me 550 dollars at the vet to get him taken care of. Two days later the coyote killed my other dog and now the one who survived is terrified to be outside. so he is pooping all in my house and garage. I hate coyotes and I would love to get rid of them at my place.
I'm sorry, but shooting an animal that's not threatening you or that you don't intend to eat is - well - wrong.
You must live in a city.
Apparently you haven't had chickens before.
I'm sorry, but shooting an animal that's not threatening you or that you don't intend to eat is - well - wrong.
I agree, a coyote is definitely a pest or varmint and needs to be removed from someones property for safety reasons alone. Having said that and not to bark up your tree or anything but i have never shot anything that large with a 22lr. Did it go down in 1 shot and may i ask why you would not use a .223 or .17hmr or something a bit more powerful than the .22lr for it? Either way nice kill and happy hunting.
True, but they are not always an open-season pest. In Texas, there is an actual squirrel season.
Like I said, if it's threatening you or you want to eat it, I'm fine with it, but killing for the sake of it is just wrong. "Threatening" is broadly defined, and can of course cover defense of pets or livestock, but shooting a coyote just because you see it is just wrong. There was no context provided by the OP, so I assume it was just because he saw it.
Like I said, if it's threatening you or you want to eat it, I'm fine with it, but killing for the sake of it is just wrong. "Threatening" is broadly defined, and can of course cover defense of pets or livestock, but shooting a coyote just because you see it is just wrong. There was no context provided by the OP, so I assume it was just because he saw it.
Like I said, if it's threatening you or you want to eat it, I'm fine with it, but killing for the sake of it is just wrong. "Threatening" is broadly defined, and can of course cover defense of pets or livestock, but shooting a coyote just because you see it is just wrong. There was no context provided by the OP, so I assume it was just because he saw it.