|
 |

06-19-2014, 02:32 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Best Red Dot with Magnifier on a budget?
Hey guys, so I've been shopping around to find the best red dot sight that comes with a 3X magnifier for my 15-22. Does anybody have any suggestions on either combo packages or buying the RD and magnifier separately? I'm on a tight budget so there's NOOOO way I can afford an EOTech. I'd like to get both the RD and magnifier for under $200...is that even possible? Thanks for the help!
|

06-19-2014, 02:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 175
Likes: 14
Liked 49 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Primary arms would be my choice on your budget
|

06-19-2014, 02:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Would you happen to have any specific suggestions? For either the red dot and/or the magnifier that would work together?
|

06-19-2014, 02:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 175
Likes: 14
Liked 49 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
|

06-19-2014, 03:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
And you trust the quality of any Primary Arms Magnifiers? The other 3X magnifier I was looking at was UTG. I've heard good and bad and it's a hell of a lot cheaper. Haven't heard much on PA though... When compared, who wins and why?
|

06-19-2014, 04:20 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 175
Likes: 14
Liked 49 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Marshal at primary arms is a stand up guy with a great business he runs. Yes get the primary arms vs the utg
Here is a link to a nice little torture test on the red dot.
Primary Arms Micro Dot ultimate torture test | Tactical Sandwich
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

06-19-2014, 05:23 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 7,937
Liked 20,634 Times in 5,958 Posts
|
|
Im no fan of those setups, but if i was... and wanted to keep things around $200... I'd call PA and tell them what you want and they'll fix you up.
Cheap UTG magnifier compared to cheap PA? Probably come out of the same Chinese labor camp.
Last edited by ChattanoogaPhil; 06-19-2014 at 05:26 PM.
|

06-19-2014, 05:58 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Frankfort, IL
Posts: 331
Likes: 171
Liked 245 Times in 111 Posts
|
|
+1 on Primary Arms when you're on a budget. That or try something like the new Vortex Sparc without the magnifier. If you're new to red dots, you might surprise yourself how well you can target shoot with a 2 moa red dot. Especially within the range of the 15-22.
On another note, part of me wonders if a sticky on threads like these would be worth having, since this type of thing comes up at least once every couple weeks. Then again, if the mods stickied the threads like this, what would we talk about in between new toys and ammo shortages?
|

06-19-2014, 06:08 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 4,671
Likes: 1,075
Liked 3,825 Times in 2,041 Posts
|
|
I have never been a fan of the red dot plus magnifier set up. Seems to me that if you need magnification, then you should have went with a scope.
Have you thought about a 1-4 variable power scope? Something like this perhaps?
Millett Tactical DMS Rifle Scope 30mm Tube 1-4x 24mm Illuminated Donut
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

06-19-2014, 11:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 895
Likes: 41
Liked 376 Times in 226 Posts
|
|
Primary Arms. Buy with confidence. But like the others, if I need magnification, I'm going with a 1-4 scope (actually, I did and it was Primary Arms also). My other 4 red dots are all Primary Arms. 1 30mm, 2 Micro Dots, 1 Multi Reticle (sold).
|

06-20-2014, 02:08 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 57
Liked 362 Times in 268 Posts
|
|
Red dots + magnifiers have pretty much gone out of fashion in the serious shooting community. This has been driven mostly by 3-gun competition. They used to be used in 3G but the advent of really good scopes with 1-6x power ranges and accurate BDC reticles has proven to be a more accurate long and short range solution that the old setups. As a result decent 1-4x scopes are now in the $200 range, like for instance the Bushnell AR-Optics 1-4x24 at $190. I know club level 3-gun shooters using this very scope. I use a slightly more expensive Burris 1-4x24 MTAC until recently in 3-gun and at 4x I can successfully engage targets out to 400 yards. I just switched my 3-gun AR to the Burris 1.5-6x40 MTAC scope and put the old 1-4x24 scope on my .22 AR conversion upper for training use.
I would use anything from Primary Arms before I stooped down to use an optic from UTG or similar companies.
|

06-20-2014, 08:20 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 660
Liked 1,731 Times in 783 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyphertext
I have never been a fan of the red dot plus magnifier set up. Seems to me that if you need magnification, then you should have went with a scope.
|
Each to his own. I like the combo. Guess I'm not a serious shooter.
I have a high powered scope ( Leupold Mark 4) and it is really nice however I have trouble quickly acquiring the target. With a red dot by itself, I can VERY quickly acquire however with my old eyes, I have to be in pretty close... under 50 yards. Since most of my shooting is under 50 yards, that is not an issue.
The advantage of the combo is it allows me to quickly configure my gun for the shooting I will be doing that day. If it is all short range, I simply remove the magnifier & I am left with a lightweight gun with fast acquisition. If long range shooting (100 yards or so for me) is in store, or I need to sight in the scope, then I attach the 3x magnifier. When not needed, it is flipped to the side, so it does not interfere with normal shooting. Only downside is a little extra weight. Once again, if I'm all done with the precision shooting, then I simply remove the magnifier. Adding & removing the magnifier does not impact the zero as the sight itself is not moving.
On my 15-22, I use the PA 3x magnifier with my Aimpoint. On my AR, I use an Eotech with their 3x magnifier. Suits my shooting style perfectly. On a tight budget, I like the TRS-25 with the PA magnifier. Get the flip to side mount.
__________________
FIDELITAS ET FORTITUDO
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

06-20-2014, 10:06 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 4,671
Likes: 1,075
Liked 3,825 Times in 2,041 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoracer
As a result decent 1-4x scopes are now in the $200 range, like for instance the Bushnell AR-Optics 1-4x24 at $190.
|
I like the reticle on this one much better than on the Millet that I posted... I thought the Bushnell was higher priced than $190.
|

06-20-2014, 10:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 75
Likes: 1
Liked 27 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Primary Arms gets almost all the votes in a thread like this. They are certainly the front runner for low budget optics and if I was ever in that market they would probably be my first choice.
As for the RDS and 3X magnification combo, I have never shot this combination, but it does seem kinda bulky. On the other hand, from what I have heard is that the variable magnification options (and I don't own one) do not provide you with a true 1x two eyes open shooting experience like the non magnified Aimpoints, Eotechs or Trijicons...Not sure how true that is so I am interested on hearing about the differences on a fixed 1x magnification optic compared to a variable optic set at 1x.
|

06-21-2014, 06:18 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East Coast (UK!)
Posts: 239
Likes: 115
Liked 79 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
No option to try PA gear in the UK as they don't ship internationally, but I was very happy with my Vortex Sparc and VMX-3 combo (until I had the opportunity to upgrade to an Eotech setup!).
Whilst not bargain basement prices, the Vortex line has some serious stuff to offer at a good mid-range point between the cheapest gear and the likes of Eo and Aimpoint. The Sparc was the only lower priced option that offered a 2MOA dot when I was looking. I understand that they've got a Gen2 version of the Sparc (1MOA?) and VMX now. Great lifetime warranty too.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

06-21-2014, 09:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 166
Likes: 104
Liked 118 Times in 56 Posts
|
|
I went with the Vortex Strikfire for my 15-22, it comes with a screw in 2x magnifier which I use rarely. For $169 it is a fine scope.
Vortex® StrikeFire Red Dot Scope : Cabela's
I put a Nikon m-223 1-4 scope on my Windham Weaponry SRC. AR-15. It's a perfect fit for me.
|

06-21-2014, 04:56 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Primary Arms.
most of there gear is built in the same factories as other mil sec gear.. I am no way saying its mil spec but its pretty dam close/ good stuff. Hell them guys even cooked a Micro dot in a frying pan to see if it would stand up to the heat from a ultimak rail on a AK.. If you have any issues call PA and talk to Marshal or head over to there industry form on ar15.. They are one of the few vendors that go the extra mile to make the customer happy..
|

06-24-2014, 06:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 57
Liked 362 Times in 268 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IceStone
Primary Arms gets almost all the votes in a thread like this. They are certainly the front runner for low budget optics and if I was ever in that market they would probably be my first choice.
As for the RDS and 3X magnification combo, I have never shot this combination, but it does seem kinda bulky. On the other hand, from what I have heard is that the variable magnification options (and I don't own one) do not provide you with a true 1x two eyes open shooting experience like the non magnified Aimpoints, Eotechs or Trijicons...Not sure how true that is so I am interested on hearing about the differences on a fixed 1x magnification optic compared to a variable optic set at 1x.
|
Actually a good 1-4x scope will give you very good 2 eyes open shooting similar to a red dot. I have no problem in 3-gun shooting my Burris MTAC scope at 1x as if it is a red dot. Problem with a red dot, magnifier or not, is you have a dot zero'd for a given distance and you have nothing that will aid you when shooting at any other distance except trying to figure out how big the target is and how much you have to hold over or not. With a BDC scope like the Burris it has dots for every range out to 600 yards and it works for just about any 55-62g bullet. For heavier bullets the dots only get off by a few inches when you are beyond 400 yards. Up to 400 yards a 69g SMK is still right on target. Can't do that with a red dot and magnifier. In 3-gun its how fast you can shoot and hit the target at any distance from 3-600 yards. Nothing beats a 1-4x or 1-6x scope for that. That is why no one uses the red dot and magnifier at the top level anymore. At the last 3-gun match I was at they surprised us with a target at 394 yards, having never had one past 300 before. Only took me 2 rounds in some wind to hit it. I doubt I could have done that with a red dot and magnifier no matter how much it cost (maybe the Eotech with the 4 dots).
|

06-25-2014, 06:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 75
Likes: 1
Liked 27 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoracer
Actually a good 1-4x scope will give you very good 2 eyes open shooting similar to a red dot. I have no problem in 3-gun shooting my Burris MTAC scope at 1x as if it is a red dot. Problem with a red dot, magnifier or not, is you have a dot zero'd for a given distance and you have nothing that will aid you when shooting at any other distance except trying to figure out how big the target is and how much you have to hold over or not. With a BDC scope like the Burris it has dots for every range out to 600 yards and it works for just about any 55-62g bullet. For heavier bullets the dots only get off by a few inches when you are beyond 400 yards. Up to 400 yards a 69g SMK is still right on target. Can't do that with a red dot and magnifier. In 3-gun its how fast you can shoot and hit the target at any distance from 3-600 yards. Nothing beats a 1-4x or 1-6x scope for that. That is why no one uses the red dot and magnifier at the top level anymore. At the last 3-gun match I was at they surprised us with a target at 394 yards, having never had one past 300 before. Only took me 2 rounds in some wind to hit it. I doubt I could have done that with a red dot and magnifier no matter how much it cost (maybe the Eotech with the 4 dots).
|
I have been reading that the new Trijicon VCOG is getting some great reviews and the more I read about it, the more I like it. Although it retails for around $2400, I think guys have been finding them for $1400 on sale. Since its a new product i would imagine you will be seeing more of them at the 3 gun comps soon if the reviews hold true.
|

06-25-2014, 07:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Leander, TX
Posts: 202
Likes: 25
Liked 67 Times in 47 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IceStone
I have been reading that the new Trijicon VCOG is getting some great reviews and the more I read about it, the more I like it. Although it retails for around $2400, I think guys have been finding them for $1400 on sale. Since its a new product i would imagine you will be seeing more of them at the 3 gun comps soon if the reviews hold true.
|
$1400 (or $2400) scope on a $400 gun????
|

06-25-2014, 07:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 75
Likes: 1
Liked 27 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkbruce
$1400 (or $2400) scope on a $400 gun????
|
Sure, whats wrong with putting a $1400 scope on a $400 rifle? Anyway I was talking in general terms and I wouldn't recommend this particular scope on a .22 because it isn't designed for it.
|

06-25-2014, 11:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I have had good luck with the Walther PS 22 Red Dot and the UTG 3X with Flip, Quick Detachable magnifier.
I have to remove the magnifier to use iron sight. CoWitnesses fine with the red dot.
|

06-26-2014, 07:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NoDak
Posts: 11
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Another vote for Primary Arms, their customer service, warranty, product and price are top notch. I just snagged one of their advance series red dots for my 20" AR and for the price the quality is fantastic.
|

06-26-2014, 07:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 57
Liked 362 Times in 268 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IceStone
I have been reading that the new Trijicon VCOG is getting some great reviews and the more I read about it, the more I like it. Although it retails for around $2400, I think guys have been finding them for $1400 on sale. Since its a new product i would imagine you will be seeing more of them at the 3 gun comps soon if the reviews hold true.
|
Nobody uses anything but variable power tactical scopes anymore. Even the USAMU recommends tactical variable scopes in combat for the DMR instead of Trijicon/Eotech red dots+magnifiers. All that being said, yes, people who have Trijicon as a sponsor will be using the new Trijicon variable power VCOG 1-6x24 scope ($2380). Those who are not sponsored likely will be using the people's choice which is the Vortex Razor HD II 1-6x24 ($1299), but if the VCOG can be bought for $1400 more people will try it. There are lots of choices in the $1000-$1500 range. But there are still decent ones in the $300-$500 range for those on a budget. For a 15-22, of which I have 2, my speed competition one has a C-More red dot on it because we never have to shoot past 35 yards. Otherwise I generally use a $150-$200 1-4x tactical scope on both my 15-22 and my AR.22 upper.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|