jeffreybehr
Member
As I've done for years with new-to-me calibers, I tested expansion, etc., of a couple .45ACP factory-load bullets. I test these by shooting them thru 1-gallon plastic waterjugs* from 10 feet. Pistol was my S&W M&P 45c with 4" barrel. Velocities were measured with my usual CED M2 chrono system set at average distance of 10 feet.
These first cartridges are the Hornady Critical Defense loaded with 185g. FTX bullets, their latest and best, plus the older Federal Premium Law Enforcement Hydra-Shok 185g. +P load.
Advertised muzzle velocities from 5" barrels are (Hornady) 1000FPS and (Federal) 1130FPS. My 5-shot averages from my 4" barrel are 965FPS (SD = 11) and 998FPS (SD 9), respectively. So the Critical Defense was close, the Federal not so.
The bullet-expansion test results also were considerably different. The top row are the Hydra-Shoks, the bottom the FTXs. The left-hand bullets were shot with no cloth on the front jug, while the RH Hydra-Shok passed thru a bundle simulating thick winter clothing, specifically 4 layers each of denim, terry toweling, and denim, my thickest-yet challenge. The RH FTX passed thru 8 layers of denim.
As you can see, both bullets performed excellently with no cloth (LH column). The HS weighed 185g., the FTX 179 (both to the nearest grain), with maximum widths of about 0.75" and 0.85" respectively. Not much difference and both excellent.
The results with cloth in the way are substantially different (RH column). The HS failed to expand at all and again weighed 185g. The FTX produced a result virtually identical to that of having no cloth in the way, weighing, again, 179g. and expanding to about 0.83" wide.
The overall performance of the FTX is about perfect IMO, while the Hydra-Shok turns out to be a PD load suited for summer but not winter weather.
I have some 185g. Gold Dot ammo on the way and will test that and also retest the Hornady load with the 12-layer bundle I'm now using.
You were right about the Hydra-Shoks, forestinmathews.
* I use sufficient number of 1-gallon waterjugs, full of water, of course, tightly aligned front to back, with varying material taped to the front of the first jug.
These first cartridges are the Hornady Critical Defense loaded with 185g. FTX bullets, their latest and best, plus the older Federal Premium Law Enforcement Hydra-Shok 185g. +P load.
Advertised muzzle velocities from 5" barrels are (Hornady) 1000FPS and (Federal) 1130FPS. My 5-shot averages from my 4" barrel are 965FPS (SD = 11) and 998FPS (SD 9), respectively. So the Critical Defense was close, the Federal not so.
The bullet-expansion test results also were considerably different. The top row are the Hydra-Shoks, the bottom the FTXs. The left-hand bullets were shot with no cloth on the front jug, while the RH Hydra-Shok passed thru a bundle simulating thick winter clothing, specifically 4 layers each of denim, terry toweling, and denim, my thickest-yet challenge. The RH FTX passed thru 8 layers of denim.

As you can see, both bullets performed excellently with no cloth (LH column). The HS weighed 185g., the FTX 179 (both to the nearest grain), with maximum widths of about 0.75" and 0.85" respectively. Not much difference and both excellent.
The results with cloth in the way are substantially different (RH column). The HS failed to expand at all and again weighed 185g. The FTX produced a result virtually identical to that of having no cloth in the way, weighing, again, 179g. and expanding to about 0.83" wide.
The overall performance of the FTX is about perfect IMO, while the Hydra-Shok turns out to be a PD load suited for summer but not winter weather.
I have some 185g. Gold Dot ammo on the way and will test that and also retest the Hornady load with the 12-layer bundle I'm now using.
You were right about the Hydra-Shoks, forestinmathews.

* I use sufficient number of 1-gallon waterjugs, full of water, of course, tightly aligned front to back, with varying material taped to the front of the first jug.
Last edited: