|
 |

04-17-2015, 10:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 251
Likes: 599
Liked 127 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
M&P 9c vs FNS 9c - Compared?
I am a S&W fan, but have lately been tempted to buy a FN FNS 9c (compact). This is primarily based on the favorable reports about how good the FNS 9 full size and compact triggers are compared to the M&P 9c triggers. Would appreciate info and any experiences which would help. I do understand that the FNS 9c models have trouble with their magazine release. Thanks in advance. Regards....
|

04-19-2015, 01:30 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 251
Likes: 599
Liked 127 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Anyone?....Anyone?......
|

04-19-2015, 01:54 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 716
Liked 783 Times in 390 Posts
|
|
The M&P has the advantage due to aftermarket parts. FN make good guns but aftermarket parts and accessories are thin on the ground and I'm not sure about their CS. You won't get a better trigger than an APEX full trigger kit in a polymer semi-auto.
Last edited by ATF; 04-20-2015 at 07:30 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-19-2015, 01:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
I gave very serious consideration to the FN pistol and to the Glock 27 before buying my M&P 40c. I have always like FN. The main thing that was scaring me about S&W is that, honestly, their quality control is sometimes pretty spotty. I picked up a Glock 27 and hated it in my hand, but like the stats. The thing that finally made me decide on S&W over FN is the availability of aftermarket parts and accessories. You can get trigger kits, barrels, magazines, all sorts of stuff for the S&W, because there are a lot of them out there. You can also go to your local police supply store and find a selection of top-quality leather for it. Not so much the FN, though.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-19-2015, 01:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Liked 73 Times in 53 Posts
|
|
They are both very close. In size, weight, and capacity.
S&W Newer triggers arguably felt better than the FN trigger.
If you own the FN Full size, get the compact for magazine/sight compatibility.
If you own the M&P Fullsize, get the M&P Compact for magazine/sight/parts compatibility.
|

04-20-2015, 02:12 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 175
Likes: 63
Liked 41 Times in 34 Posts
|
|
I too like the FNS platform. I found a deal on a FNS 9 and fell in loved with it so much I bought the long slide. I've been considering the new FNS compact and finally held one the other day. I compared it to my M&P 9c and, size wise, they're identical. My M&P is newer and has a good trigger as did the FN! They were so close though that I'm in no hurry to buy and FN unless I run across a deal and all bets are off!
__________________
9/40FS, 9c, 9 Shield, MP22
|

05-02-2015, 11:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 290
Likes: 437
Liked 300 Times in 134 Posts
|
|
I used to have an M&P40c, I carry a Block 26, and am looking into a FNS 9c. The way I see it, what the FNS has going for it over the M&P is true ambidextrous controls (not just reversible mag) and, in my opinion, a better trigger. I also had a Shield and I prefer both the FNS and Glock triggers over it. I also like the texturing of the FNS 9c, it's bigger/bolder/easier to see front sight, and the fact not everyone is carrying it. What it has going against it is the lack of aftermarket support, and neither the FNS or the M&P are as short as the Glock which ultimately edges out both of the others regarding concealability.
|

05-02-2015, 12:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 323
Likes: 437
Liked 369 Times in 132 Posts
|
|
I have shot the standard size FNS 9 and can see why some would prefer its trigger over the stock M&P. Add an apex sear and I think the M&P is far superior to the FNS. Just my opinion.
You can't go wrong with either.
|

05-03-2015, 10:14 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 330
Likes: 109
Liked 84 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
the FN pistols specially the .45 ACP makes me feel like I'm holding a 2X4.
|

04-02-2016, 08:36 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Just bought an FNS-9C
Just bought an FNS-9C. Nice pistol, built like a tank as far as polymer guns go. Also have a Shield 9mm. Weird when handling both, the Shield feels heavier when you pick them up but the FN actually is, something like 1.3 lbs. on the Shield versus 1.5 for the FN. As far as how they run, both are great. Slightly longer on the FN for carry purposes. Also a little wider on the frame, slide, and grips. Has to be for the double-stack 17-round magazine that comes with it. Honestly not that much difference in a holster for size or weight.
The FN is a good deal at 500 bucks, give or take, considering it comes with 3 magazines and 2 back straps. One magazine is 12-round flush bottom, another is 12-round extended grip so your pinky can get on there, and the third is a longer base 17-round. FN has made a ton of military weapons over the years, and the FNS-9C reflects that. Consider it military-grade, and it looks like it too.
Double-spring RSA, so it's stiff to rack (and new), but so was the Shield. Actually found the Shield ridiculous when new, and I posted some rants about that and replaced the RSA with aftermarket to make it easier. Whole concept of the double-spring of course is to take more recoil away from your hand, but it sure makes them harder to rack.
If you read online reviews of the FN, you'll see people griping about the mag release and whether or not they drop easily. Sort of true. But c'mon, if you can't take care of a threat with 12, much less 17 rounds, then........
|

04-02-2016, 12:20 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 405
Likes: 218
Liked 199 Times in 111 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsshackel
If you read online reviews of the FN, you'll see people griping about the mag release and whether or not they drop easily. Sort of true. But c'mon, if you can't take care of a threat with 12, much less 17 rounds, then........
|
True this ^. If you need more than 12 rounds you either need more range time or more than a hand gun and extra magazines.
__________________
Life Member B.A.S.S., NAFC
|

04-02-2016, 03:38 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 723
Likes: 1,609
Liked 415 Times in 226 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deadeye Dick
True this ^. If you need more than 12 rounds you either need more range time or more than a hand gun and extra magazines.
|
Seriously? You're assuming one on one, like no one will ever face multiple attackers.
__________________
MSP - Retired
|

04-02-2016, 06:52 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 405
Likes: 218
Liked 199 Times in 111 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob O
Seriously? You're assuming one on one, like no one will ever face multiple attackers.
|
Seriously. Unlike Arnold Schwarzenegger or Matt Damon I don't plan on sticking around to fight it out with an entire gang. The hand gun will hopefully buy me time & space to beat a hasty retreat or find cover until help arrives. If I new I had to face such a gang I would want a sub machine gun not a handgun to begin with.
Just how many armed and determined multiple assailants do you think you can take on at the same time by yourself even if you had unlimited rounds like the guns they use in the movies?
__________________
Life Member B.A.S.S., NAFC
|

04-02-2016, 09:45 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 723
Likes: 1,609
Liked 415 Times in 226 Posts
|
|
Well, I guess it depends on what you're prepared for, your background and mindset, whether you've ever been found in the wrong place and the wrong time, etc.
__________________
MSP - Retired
|

04-02-2016, 10:37 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Heart of Dixie
Posts: 183
Likes: 119
Liked 61 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Getting away from tactics and scenarios for a minute...both are fine firearms made by excellent companies. I don't believe one is going to go wrong with either.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-03-2016, 09:00 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 3
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Can't help out the OP, but found it interesting to read this thread.
I own an FN(H) FNX-9 and absolutely love it. I did put Talon grips (grip tape) on it but other than that it is oem original. Very reliable, very accurate, natural pointer...to me. However...I do find it to hard to carry and conceal on my 5'9" 180-lb frame in Florida. So I slapped a laser/flashlight combo on it and it is gonna be the locked & loaded house gun -- yes you can put the FNX in Cond1 just like a 1911.
I'm currently searching for my new EDC, the PC Shield in 9mm. Just need to find one for a decent price. My local wants $500+tax, etc., which'll put me up around $535...too much. Hoping to find something out of state online for about $430+cheap shipping+my FFL fees= $465'ish.
Patiently waiting...
// Radar //
Last edited by Radarcontact; 04-03-2016 at 09:02 AM.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|