|
 |

02-12-2021, 11:34 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
M&P 2.0 compact magazine
Will the 9mm 2.0 compact with 15 round magazines accept the 10 round magazines?
|

02-12-2021, 02:07 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 255
Likes: 77
Liked 307 Times in 128 Posts
|
|
If I understand correctly, the M&P 2.0 Compact will accept any magazine that fits the full size M&P. It will stick out, but it will fit.
Caveat: this is what I understand; I do not own a 2.0 Compact.
Last edited by SchemaEnigma; 02-13-2021 at 12:38 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

02-12-2021, 03:17 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Northeast, Illinois
Posts: 6,027
Likes: 54
Liked 1,492 Times in 437 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by randylbrownObafgkmrns
Will the 9mm 2.0 compact with 15 round magazines accept the 10 round magazines?
|
S&W shows the 10 round version of the M&P9 2.0 Compact on their website so there should be 10 round magazines available. There are some available on Ebay: Smith & Wesson M&P 9 M2.0 Compact 9mm 10-Round Magazine 3011499 22188878615 | eBay
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

02-12-2021, 03:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 895
Liked 1,532 Times in 727 Posts
|
|
The 2.0 compact will accept any magazine designed for the 1.0 full size, 2.0 full size and 2.0 compact.
It will not work with magazines designed for the 1.0 compact or 2.0 subcompact. They are too short and will not latch into place.
S&W makes 10 round magazines for all variations of its M&P line so you will have to be careful about which size you choose.
When they came out with the 2.0 series they changed what they call a compact. With the 1.0 guns they had a full size gun with a standard capacity of 17 rounds of 9mm and a compact which a standard capacity magazine of 12rounds.
When they came out with the 2.0 guns they introduced a new size with a 15 round capacity and called it compact.
2.0 full size = 1.0 full size
2.0 compact - No comparable 1.0 gun
2.0 subcompact = 1.0 compact
Last edited by Dave Lively; 02-12-2021 at 03:48 PM.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|

02-12-2021, 10:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Liked 117 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by randylbrownObafgkmrns
Will the 9mm 2.0 compact with 15 round magazines accept the 10 round magazines?
|
Yes, the gun and magazines are the same. But why would you want to?
|

02-12-2021, 10:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Liked 117 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SchemaEnigma
If I understand correctly, the M&P 2.0 Compact will accept any magazine that fits the full size M&P. It will stick out, but it will fit.
Caveat: this is what I understand; I do not own a 20. Compact.
|
The 2 compact comes with spacers for that void. A nice touch for those 1 full size owners.
|

02-12-2021, 11:57 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Central Washington state
Posts: 327
Likes: 182
Liked 161 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by randylbrownObafgkmrns
Will the 9mm 2.0 compact with 15 round magazines accept the 10 round magazines?
|
No they do not accept the 10 round magazines. They will accept longer magazines but not shorter ones. The grip on the Compact 2.0 is too long for the 10 round magazines. They will accept the 12, 15 and 17 round magazines that have the plug in them to prevent using more than 10 rounds in those states that limit the capacity you are allowed to use. The compact 2.0 has a longer grip than the compact 1.0 so a shorter magazine will not fit it.
Last edited by Raisin; 02-13-2021 at 03:45 PM.
|

02-13-2021, 11:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 895
Liked 1,532 Times in 727 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raisin
No they do not accept the 10 round magazines. They will accept longer magazines but not shorter ones. The grip on the Compact 2.0 is too long for the 10 round magazines.
|
S&W doesn't make a 9mm M&P with a grip so short the full capacity magazine only holds 10 rounds. Even the subcompact holds 12 rounds. But they do make 10 round versions of the subcompact, compact and full size magazines for states that limit magazine capacity.
So as long as the OP buys a 10 round magazine made for the compact or full size gun it will work. Although having a full size 10 round magazine sticking out instead of buying the flush fitting 10 round magazines meant for the compact would be silly. But you are correct that the 10 round magazines designed for the subcompact would not work.
If the he has a 2.0 compact and is limited to 10 rounds the magazine the OP want is S&W part number 3011499, UPC 022188878615 . Google either of those numbers to find the right magazine. But this being 2021 good luck finding them in stock.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

02-13-2021, 11:12 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 438
Likes: 2,910
Liked 1,150 Times in 311 Posts
|
|
They sure have made it confusing for those not real familiar with M&Ps. Use caution when ordering holsters, you might not get what you want.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

02-13-2021, 11:29 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Altoona, PA
Posts: 851
Likes: 231
Liked 1,731 Times in 521 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Lively
2.0 full size = 1.0 full size
2.0 compact - No comparable 1.0 gun
2.0 subcompact = 1.0 compact
|
I don't know who the marketing genius that came up with this confusing naming scheme was but he should be fired.
|

02-13-2021, 01:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 895
Liked 1,532 Times in 727 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmb617
I don't know who the marketing genius that came up with this confusing naming scheme was but he should be fired.
|
I think they did to be consistent with how Glock, Sig and other companies label their guns. But yes, it can be confusing.
|

02-13-2021, 05:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Liked 117 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raisin
No they do not accept the 10 round magazines. They will accept longer magazines but not shorter ones. The grip on the Compact 2.0 is too long for the 10 round magazines. They will accept the 12, 15 and 17 round magazines that have the plug in them to prevent using more than 10 rounds in those states that limit the capacity you are allowed to use. The compact 2.0 has a longer grip than the compact 1.0 so a shorter magazine will not fit it.
|
I have 3 10 round magazines that fit my M&P 2 compact 4" with 5" height, that also can use 15 round magazines. Maybe you, me and the OP are talking about different things. I assume he has 15 round magazines and can only find 10 round ones for sale. These are made for 10 round restricted states like mine. You may be talking about the 2 subcompact.
Last edited by southchatham; 02-13-2021 at 05:36 PM.
|

02-13-2021, 05:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Liked 117 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Lively
S&W doesn't make a 9mm M&P with a grip so short the full capacity magazine only holds 10 rounds. Even the subcompact holds 12 rounds. But they do make 10 round versions of the subcompact, compact and full size magazines for states that limit magazine capacity.
So as long as the OP buys a 10 round magazine made for the compact or full size gun it will work. Although having a full size 10 round magazine sticking out instead of buying the flush fitting 10 round magazines meant for the compact would be silly. But you are correct that the 10 round magazines designed for the subcompact would not work.
If the he has a 2.0 compact and is limited to 10 rounds the magazine the OP want is S&W part number 3011499, UPC 022188878615 . Google either of those numbers to find the right magazine. But this being 2021 good luck finding them in stock.
|
I bought one today at my local shop. They had a bunch of FS ones. I found this in a stack of the FS mags. It may have been the only one or more may have been mixed in.
Notice nothing on it says compact, so confusing if you don't know the part #.
|

02-13-2021, 06:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 895
Liked 1,532 Times in 727 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by southchatham
Notice nothing on it says compact, so confusing if you don't know the part #.
|
It sure is.
Buying a magazine should not require a research project. Putting "10 round magazine for 9mm 2.0 Compact" on the label would have been an easy no-cost way to eliminate any confusion.
|

02-13-2021, 08:17 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 2,355
Likes: 796
Liked 1,123 Times in 723 Posts
|
|
Sad but true. Two factors need consideration.
First, magazine length. Full Size, Compact, Subcompact, V 1.0, V 2.0.
Next Capacity, 17 rounds, 15 rounds, 12 rounds, 10 rounds.
State Compliance drives another axis on the matrix.
I have a fullsize 1.0 (17 round length) that only hold 10 rounds.
I have a 1.0 Compact (in 2.0 speak, it a subcompact) that holds only 10 rounds (12 rounds in free states).
There are full size mags (17 round length) that only hold 15 rounds for state compliance (e.g. Colorado).
So not all M&P 10 rounds mags fit all M&Ps.
It's up to you to determine what's the right mag for your firearm given any state restriction. Having said that, that's why we're here.
|

02-14-2021, 03:52 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 26
Likes: 4
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Throwing my 2 cents in here. From a person who owned a 1.0 compact (which many people think is the shield, but definitely not) to now a 2.0 compact, I had left over 10 round magazines. What I did was the following:
These
S&W M&P 10RD COMPACT Low Pro 9MM MAG PLATE
Added to this
M&P 2.0 "COMPACT" EDC Magwell
It came out to be a very nice CA legal setup. From the looks of the base plates, it'd work with out the magwell too.  
|

02-14-2021, 09:44 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,188
Likes: 9,290
Liked 10,093 Times in 3,872 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmb617
I don't know who the marketing genius that came up with this confusing naming scheme was but he should be fired.
|
Probably a "Woodstock Baby".
Great, great grandson of whoever designed the roads and tunnels in & out of Pittsburgh.
__________________
Waiting For The Sun.
|

02-14-2021, 12:27 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 242
Likes: 365
Liked 152 Times in 95 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffrefrig
Probably a "Woodstock Baby".
Great, great grandson of whoever designed the roads and tunnels in & out of Pittsburgh.
|
Off topic, but I once got lost in McKee's Rocks in the middle of the night (I'm from Detroit) and was convinced that one day somebody would find my skeleton slumped over my steering wheel. Unbelievable.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|