Okay all, this is coming from a Sigma fan.
I picked up my G17/G3 today. I took it out on the range side by side with my 40ve and shot 150 rounds of TULAmmo thru both.
Glock first.
The Glock mags are not hard to load, I do not know how that became an issue. The Glock speed loader is a pile of ****.
Glock was more like I was using a utility, kind of squeeky, that was the recoil spring though. The Glock is dead on right out of the box, I shot at 10,14,25 yards, bull every time. There is no getting used to the trigger it is light and the reset is great. there is no mistaking a blind man if the gun does not have one in the pipe. The trigger is fully depressed in its rear most position. you cannot pull the trigger at all.
Sigma is one of my favorite guns. It took some getting used to the trigger. Out of the box it always shot low left, but that was a while ago. The trigger on MY sigma is heavy compared to the glock. the 40ve is more of a luxury gun. when it operates you can't feel it like you can with the Glock.
I don't really see how these two guns ever got in a battle of which one it better. The only thing these two have in common is the way the barrel and the recoil spring fit into the gun. The rest is night and day except if you had REALLY poor eye sight and you looked at the body of the guns with the slide off. There really is not a whole lot that is simlar. all the pins are in different places, the slide is longer, the trigger is different, sight are different, rail is different mag is WAY different, etc.. The thing I like better about the glock is the trigger when there is not one in the pipe.
Comparing these two guns is like comparing a Mazda Miata to a Fiat Spider. They kid of look similar from a distance but when you get up close they are competely different.
I picked up my G17/G3 today. I took it out on the range side by side with my 40ve and shot 150 rounds of TULAmmo thru both.
Glock first.
The Glock mags are not hard to load, I do not know how that became an issue. The Glock speed loader is a pile of ****.
Glock was more like I was using a utility, kind of squeeky, that was the recoil spring though. The Glock is dead on right out of the box, I shot at 10,14,25 yards, bull every time. There is no getting used to the trigger it is light and the reset is great. there is no mistaking a blind man if the gun does not have one in the pipe. The trigger is fully depressed in its rear most position. you cannot pull the trigger at all.
Sigma is one of my favorite guns. It took some getting used to the trigger. Out of the box it always shot low left, but that was a while ago. The trigger on MY sigma is heavy compared to the glock. the 40ve is more of a luxury gun. when it operates you can't feel it like you can with the Glock.
I don't really see how these two guns ever got in a battle of which one it better. The only thing these two have in common is the way the barrel and the recoil spring fit into the gun. The rest is night and day except if you had REALLY poor eye sight and you looked at the body of the guns with the slide off. There really is not a whole lot that is simlar. all the pins are in different places, the slide is longer, the trigger is different, sight are different, rail is different mag is WAY different, etc.. The thing I like better about the glock is the trigger when there is not one in the pipe.
Comparing these two guns is like comparing a Mazda Miata to a Fiat Spider. They kid of look similar from a distance but when you get up close they are competely different.
