Micro Conversion Kit MCK for S&W M&P.

Register to hide this ad
Uh...Why?!?!?
I'm sorry, I hope I'm not insulting you, but these things are a ridiculous waste of money. They most certainly don't "help convert your pistol into the ultimate Smith & Wesson submachine gun." If that were actually true it would be highly illegal. The fact that it's not means this is just reeeaaallly stoopid. :cool:
Either a guy is good with his handgun, or he ain't. If he ain't, another pound or two of "space-age polymer material" wrapped around it to essentially hide it in an effort to make everyone think he's uber cool isn't going to turn him into the second coming of Jerry Miculek. :rolleyes:
 
I don't doubt that an average shooter could improve his hit potential at 50 yards with this device. Instead of two hands you have two hands, a cheek weld and shoulder pocket to steady the gun.

I object to placing my off hand so close to the muzzle. Because I don't want one doesn't mean that you shouldn't have one. I don't want a Honda Civic with a ground effects kit and a tin can exhaust either.
 
I have a friend with a Mustang. I've seen him put 2 different exhausts on it to, "get the right sound". He's always fine tuning something. It's his car, his money, he can do what he wants.
Same with these kits. Customize your pistol.
The part of the ad that says "make it a S&W submachine gun" seems like a poor choice of words to me with the ATF looking at pistol braces and a Democrat president coming in to office.
 
Don't underestimate the value of a stock.

I took my Ruger PC 9mm carbine and M&P 2.0 compact to the gun club yesterday. I have owned the M&P for a few years and put a few thousand rounds through it. It was my first time shooting the carbine but I was much faster and more accurate with the carbine. The steel plates were falling faster and with fewer misses than I have ever achieved with a handgun of any type. Its stock made a huge difference.

Most people shoot long guns better than handguns. If you can shoot your handgun good enough for defensive purposes you don't gain anything from the carbine. But for a lot of people having a stock makes them much more effective.

I bought the Ruger mostly because the club I shoot at does not allow shooting rifle calibers at steel plates, rifle calibers dig craters in the plates and causes bullet fragments to come back. And shooting a long gun at the plates looked like fun. Which it is. For more serious purposes a real rifle or handgun does most things better than a pistol wrapped in a stock would. Another downside to the Roni is pistol braces are always one ATF ruling reversal from going the way of bump stocks.

My advice to the OP is if you want a short, small and light PCC look at getting a Keltec Sub-2000 once the pandemic ends and prices come down to normal. They make one that takes M&P magazines. And leave your M&P as it is.
 
I would be leery of putting any money in a MCK right now. Although the ATF has temporarily revoked its letter changing the rules on arm braces, its not gone away and initial reports indicate rogue elements within the ATF are violating long standing protocols by lobbying the incoming Sleepy Joe administration to invoke gun control by executive fiat, including banning arm braces and 80% receivers. Like the owners of the bump stocks, and yes they're still out there, I prefer to openly enjoy what I lawfully purchase rather than hide it in the attic and hope no one rats you out.
 
Back
Top