Overall true, but it's questionable to say tests prove nothing. Meaningful understanding of how different bullet are likely to perform against one another in a real world shooting can be extrapolated from testing different loads against the same media to establish a baseline of bullet performance.It's fun to watch his videos, but it reality his tests prove nothing. Humans are not made of water soaked newspaper in milk jugs, permagel or even ballistic gel. What matters is how bullets react to real human flesh, blood and bones in real world shootings, and the Win Ranger 127SXT+P+ is one of the top performers in real human beings.
That's the key: different loads against the same media.
Nobody's saying simulations are definitive.
Interesting, the Winchester Ranger; could you link some reports?
Last edited: