If you don't have a real preference and can only have one always get the older gun. Hate to say it, but sounds like maybe pass on them or find someone that will appreciate them.
Do you mean that from a collector or shooters perspective?
If you don't have a real preference and can only have one always get the older gun. Hate to say it, but sounds like maybe pass on them or find someone that will appreciate them.
Then the criteria should be (1) Which fits the hand better, a square N frame grip or a "K" frame round butt grip on an L frame revolver? (2) Is the larger N frame cylinder with it's larger mass a significant factor in the OP's shooting double-action? (3) Is one action smoother than the other? (4) Do the adjustable sights work better or are easier to see on one vs. the other? (5) Does one total weight and/ or balance seem to be easier to point? (6) Would SS be preferable considering the use?Agreed. Both revolvers will assuredly shoot into one hole at ten yards.
This is really about choosing the revolver the OP enjoys more, and the OP is the only one that can answer that question.
One thing to consider is that the P&R model 28-2 will continue to increase in price and demand in the future. The 686?, not so much![]()
I would need some lead 158 and a few 125 JHP 357 loads through both, before I made that decision.
Glad that you found those two great revolvers, to maybe add to your stock.