1911 SC issue

jgh4445

US Veteran
Joined
Oct 13, 2007
Messages
892
Reaction score
433
Location
Alabama
I bought an S&W 1911 Series E SC and had an issue. Sent it back to Smith and am now awaiting the reply. Here is the letter I sent in with the pistol.

“This pistol, along with 11 others, was stolen last year from the store I bought it from. In his haste to get away, the robber dropped this pistol and 3 others out of his backpack and onto the pavement and rocks in the parking lot. The police recovered them the next morning and put them in the evidence room.
After the robberies were solved, the insurance company paid the store for their losses. The store then bought the recovered weapons from the insurance co. I, in turn bought this pistol from the store. I was shown the damage which consisted of some minor, cosmetic dings and a small dent on the underside of the dust cover. We took the pistol apart in the store to make sure there was no further damage. Everything looked good. I decided to buy it as I was going to have it cerracoted (sp) anyway for a carry gun.
Seeing no damage other than cosmetics, I took it to the range to fire it. It shot great. POA and POI were the same. No jams or FTF at all. I did notice that ejection was erratic. Sometimes the spent shell would eject at 3 o’clock as it should and other times it hit under the brim of my hat or hit the roof of the firing line. At one point one casing flew over the bench in front and to the right of the pistol. I fired 4 magazines full, two full loads in each mag, of Winchester white box 230 gr ball to make sure they functioned properly. They did. I shot a few wad cutters and a few hollow points to make sure they fed all right. The pistol functioned flawlessly. I decided to take the pistol down to clean it before leaving the range. As I did, one of my friends picked up the frame and grip portion and looked up and said, hey, your frame is cracked! I looked at it and sure enough, at the flat spot on the underside of the dust cover I saw a crack. It goes all the way through. We had all examined the pistol thoroughly in the store before I paid for it. The crack was not there at that time. I’m sure it happened during firing. I didn’t even clean it, I just stopped shooting and went home.
Is it safe to continue to shoot? Can this crack be repaired? If so, what will the cost be? Would it be possible to purchase a new frame and use all of my existing parts to re-assemble it? Can the ejector be adjusted to eject correctly? Also, when the slide is locked back and a magazine is inserted, are you supposed to be able to pull back on the slide slightly, release it and have it go into battery? Kimbers and some Colts do. This one does not.
I’m just sick over this as, like I said, it was a new, unfired pistol with just a few dings and all of a sudden its now sporting a cracked frame. This is the first alloy frame pistol I’ve ever owned. Are they all this fragile? I don’t believe a steel framed gun would have cracked open like that. Have you had instances where the Scandium frames have cracked before?
Any help you can provide will be greatly appreciated."

When I was getting a return approval, the CS rep told me it definitely would not be under warranty. He said most likely they would want to destroy this one and sell me a new one at a drastically reduced price. I asked how drastic and he said probably distributor cost. He went on to say that the “Smith” would be the one making the decisions. The crack is almost invisible. I don’t know if it will get larger over time or not. Hope they can just sell me a new frame. What do you guys think?
 
Register to hide this ad
Hello. Take the Customer Service Rep's offer! It is more than fair. Given the troubled history of this firearm, this will give you a new pistol which you will not have misgivings about in the future. Sorry about your experiences, but chalk it up to "another bump in the road of life". I am hoping to get a S&W SC 1911 someday. You made a good selection! Regards, Ed
 
I'd be unlikely to take S&W 's offer. You would, in effect, be paying for the same gun twice: the discount is unlikely to be more than 10-20% less than retail.

I'd take the gun to a good gunsmith and ask how to prevent the crack from getting larger (probably by drilling small holes at each end of the crack).

You'll have a very functional pistol with a cosmetic problem.

I had a Gold Cup that developed a crack at the slide stop hole after nearly 100,000 rounds. My gunsmith 'fixed' it (took 5 minutes) and it went on for another 80,000 rounds before I used it as a trade.
 
I don't know that I would want a "new" firearm of any kind, much less something you apparently plan to use for self-defense, that has been structurally repaired (or in this case, patched up). I think it is generous of S&W to do anything for you seeing as how you were in all reality buying salvaged goods with visible damage.

You took a chance on saving some money (I hope) on an "As-Is" item and lost. I know from my years in the franchised automobile dealership service industry that if a manufacturer ever learns that a vehicle was sold "As-Is" (which is easier than you might think), warranties on that vehicle are voided. Given that, S&W is doing right by you.

Sorry to hear of you troubles but here's the bright side - it isn't something involving your health.

Ed
 
I agree with RPG about buying the gun twice. Technically the gun was still new, because it had never been sold to a third party beyond the dealer. Since the gun wasn't cracked before you bought it, it's most likely a manufacturing defect as opposed to damage from the robbery. Like all organizations, S&W has a chain of command, with each layer having more decision making power. I'd start working my way up the chain.
 
Technically the gun was still new, because it had never been sold to a third party beyond the dealer. Since the gun wasn't cracked before you bought it, it's most likely a manufacturing defect as opposed to damage from the robbery.

Technically, the OP is the 3rd owner if I read his opening correctly. Further, even if the crack is due to a manufacturing defect, there is no way to prove this in any financially feasible manner to Smith & Wesson. I agree that S&W has made a fair & reasonable offer. Unfortunately, it's of no help to the OP. It is probably the best course of action to have the gun examined by a good gunsmith. The idea of drilling a small hole at the end(s) of the crack should stop the crack from lengthening. The 'smith should also look for any other hidden damage while he has it! With the crack being on the underside of the dust cover, the proposed holes should not be very noticeable and you would have a very nice shooter at supposedly highly discounted price.

Bruce
 
Last edited:
I must be missing something here, because, in my opinion, if the pistol was sold "as new", then it should be warranted "as new". I didn't see where the OP received the pistol at a discount because of the prior incident, so if someone could explain this I would appreciate it.
 
Technically, the OP is the 3rd owner if I read his opening correctly. Further, even if the crack is due to a manufacturing defect, there is no way to prove this in any financially feasible manner to Smith & Wesson. I agree that S&W has made a fair & reasonable offer. Unfortunately, it's of no help to the OP. It is probably the best course of action to have the gun examined by a good gunsmith. The idea of drilling a small hole at the end(s) of the crack should stop the crack from lengthening. The 'smith should also look for any other hidden damage while he has it! With the crack being on the underside of the dust cover, the proposed holes should not be very noticeable and you would have a very nice shooter at supposedly highly discounted price.

Bruce

If you are going to say that the gun dealer was technically an owner, then no one can ever buy a new gun unless they get it straight from the factory. The police never owned it, they merely had it as evidence, and I'm betting the insurance company never took physical possession of it either, unless they filed out a 4473. As for the crook, I think we can rule him out as an owner too. :D
 
I must be missing something here, because, in my opinion, if the pistol was sold "as new",

If you are going to say that the gun dealer was technically an owner, then no one can ever buy a new gun unless they get it straight from the factory.

To be honest, I didn't see where the OP said the guns shop represented the gun as being new. As a matter of fact, the guns shop qualified the circumstances surrounding a damaged gun selling for a highly discounted price in detail!

The insurance company bought the guns and then turned around and sold them back to the gun shop (two changes of possession). The shop then turned around and sold the damaged gun to the OP (third owner). Just because the OP purchased the gun at a gunshop does not mean that the shop sold him a "new" gun. So, I don't understand what some folks are looking at. As far as the gun being in physical possession, if they completed a purchase agreeement (damage settlement) with the gun shop, it (physical possession) means absolutely zip, the same as a home or a car. All that needs to happen is legal ownership has to transfer. It seems as though the Insurance Company made a settlement with the gunshop (and which the shop accepted) the same as when they total a car. This isn't that hard to figure out unless you suffer from some sort of tunnel vision.

But anyway.................

Bruce

P.S. The OP didn't specifically say that he got a discount but would you or anybody pay full freight for a damaged pistol?
 
Last edited:
I was looking for parachute, so I could try sky diving. A guy on Craigslist was selling one. It was from WWI, but as new, old stock. I'm trying it out this weekend...
 
I hope some old Moth or two has not had a lunch on this parachute over the years. This could prove Not so much fun when you try it out. A swiss cheesed parachute may not work too well.
 
I hope some old Moth or two has not had a lunch on this parachute over the years. This could prove Not so much fun when you try it out. A swiss cheesed parachute may not work too well.

It's only my life I'm putting at risk and it was a good deal...
 
Hey josywales if the chute doesn't work maybe your next of kin can return it to the manufacture for warranty work. Are you the first owner?
 
To be honest, I didn't see where the OP said the guns shop represented the gun as being new. As a matter of fact, the guns shop qualified the circumstances surrounding a damaged gun selling for a highly discounted price in detail!

The insurance company bought the guns and then turned around and sold them back to the gun shop (two changes of possession). The shop then turned around and sold the damaged gun to the OP (third owner). Just because the OP purchased the gun at a gunshop does not mean that the shop sold him a "new" gun. So, I don't understand what some folks are looking at. As far as the gun being in physical possession, if they completed a purchase agreeement (damage settlement) with the gun shop, it (physical possession) means absolutely zip, the same as a home or a car. All that needs to happen is legal ownership has to transfer. It seems as though the Insurance Company made a settlement with the gunshop (and which the shop accepted) the same as when they total a car. This isn't that hard to figure out unless you suffer from some sort of tunnel vision.

But anyway.................

Bruce

P.S. The OP didn't specifically say that he got a discount but would you or anybody pay full freight for a damaged pistol?

I guess I assumed since it was "technically" a new gun, it was sold as such. There is no mention as to what the OP actually paid, & there was no discount discussed. So I'm not the only one making an assumption...
 
I guess I assumed since it was "technically" a new gun, it was sold as such. There is no mention as to what the OP actually paid, & there was no discount discussed. So I'm not the only one making an assumption...

You are right, and in re-reading the OP's post, it's not clear if it was a new gun or a used one the dealer had on hand. If it was new, I stand by my original statement, but if it happened to be used before it was stolen, then all bets are off. :)
 
Hey josywales if the chute doesn't work maybe your next of kin can return it to the manufacture for warranty work. Are you the first owner?

The seller told me it was stolen from his Army-Navy store, but he bought it back from the insurance company. Even though they never jumped with it, technically, the insurance company would have been the first owner. Similar to another topic I read somewhere...
 
I love it when the word "technically" pops up in these types of discussions. Reminds me of a discussion with a girl friend many years ago who exclaimed:. "Technically, I was a virgin when I married my former husband!". We didn't pursue that comment any further..... Regards, Ed
 
Thanks for all of the replies. I'll try and clear up some of the questions. Sure am sorry about the parachute. Shouldn't buy one from surplus that you don't know will work. They are not like a pistol you know. You can tell from the damage if a pistol will work or not. Most times lol.

1. Yep, it was a new, unfired pistol that was in a glass display case along with about a hundred other pistols. ( The dumb butts left a very portable plexiglass case on top of the counter with 6 Les Baers, the cheapest being about 3 grand).

2. The pistol was returned to the store from the police evidence room. Insurance had already paid off. The store contacted the insurance company and wanted to know where to send them and the insurance company made them a really good offer according to the store manager. He bought them and then sold all of them at significant discounts. He knew I was interested in a 1911SC so he offered me this one. We looked it over and I saw all of the dings . It had one on the right wood grip, one on the trigger guard and the one tiny flat spot on the underside, dead center of the dust cover. I was offered the pistol at a bit less than half of retail. My thinking was that it would be a good deal because I could have it ceracoated and the damage would not be noticeable. I had researched the scandium guns and I found a lot of complaints about the factory finish on the scandium rubbing off. I thought that I could have it coated and have a better finish.
3. I could have just called Smith and asked for a return authorization and never mentioned the history of the gun. I could have just said that the gun cracked from firing. ( It actually did, but the crack suspiciously went from a 16th of an inch above the little flat spot to about the same distance below it. If I was the smith examining it, I would have thought that suspicious and that would have made be leery of the owners story. I decided to just be honest and see what they could or would do for me. The choices are they will offer me a new replacement at a discount which could actually cause me to have more than retail in the gun. They could sell me a new frame and put all of my parts back on it. (I'd be really happy with that) They could say that the scandium should not have cracked like that and replace it. ( Google scandium S&W's and you'll find a lot of cracks from falls and +P ammo in revolvers.) or, they could say sorry, nothing we can do. We'll just have to see.
If they send it back untouched, I like the idea of drilling the two holes in it, thereby stopping the crack from spreading. With a good thick coat of ceracoat it will hardly be noticeable. Great idea, thanks! The dust cover doesn't have much if anything to do with function or reliability. I can live with the blemish.
 
Back
Top