I've got a Smith M63 and a M18...For SA/DA revolvers, I doubt you can do better.
The 3 yr old 63 had a good SA trigger right out of the box but the DA was overweight and scratchy. Too, the gun locked up on day one after 50 rounds or so. During that time, I was sprayed with burnt powder and lead particles due to an uneven cylinder/forcing cone gap (0.004" at top, 0.012" at the bottom). A call to S&W got me a FEDEX shipping label and I had the gun back in ~2 months, all on their dime.
All was made right: new barrel, hand, cylinder and they'd done a pretty good trigger job on it as well. It shouldn't have left the factory in that condition, but they did make good on it in the end.
The M-63's a 3" bbl'd, casual carry piece for me when walking out my pointer pup and as a fishing vest companion. Accuracy with that short bbl. is great; with CCI Mini Mags or Standard velocity running ~1" at 10 yds from my unsupported Weaver Stance. I'm not crazy about the fiber optic front sight, but, contrary to my objection to it, the gun's quite accurate even with the short bbl. Overall, it's a good gun, even with its teething pains.
The M18 was in almost NIB condition when I bought it off GB, for $400 three years ago. No box or nor paper and I was the only bidder. Go figure.
Initially, it had sticky charge holes, requiring a hefty smack on the ejector rod, but some light polishing with JB Bore paste on a cotton bore mop helped with the problem, and the borrowed finish reamer available here on the forum, took care of the rest. BTW, the reaming did not diminish accuracy whatsoever. Both triggers were superb as I received it and its accuracy rivals that of my late '68 vintage Smith M-41. For woods carry and as an understudy for my M-19's, M-66, M-67, M-686, & M-27, it's unbeatable. I truly love the gun....
Synopsis: For a tackle box, kit gun etc., the M-63 with a 3" bbl. is just right and its light weight makes it an easy choice. But for the sheer love of punching target paper or tin cans out to 50 yds or cheap practice for the center fires, the M-18 is the winner.
I found a Diamondback Colt 20+ years ago for ~$400 or so, loved the look of it but found it was just not as accurate as a friend's M-18 Smith. Later, my own M-18 proved to be just as superior to the Colt. They're collector items now...the Colts, and just not contenders as field carry arms, IMHO.
Pics below of each; last pic of my M-18 & Colt Diamondback .22.
Rod