Barbarosa99
Member
looking at a 25-5 8 3/8” Blue at about 97%, no box or tools etc. seller is asking $900. Good or bad?

I gave more than that for a 4" nickel version, it sounds reasonable to me if you want the long barrel. It ought to make for a great range gun, .45 Colt is fun to shoot. I own four guns chambered for it; the M25-5, two Uberti SA revolvers and a Henry Big Boy lever action. It all started with the M25-5.looking at a 25-5 8 3/8” Blue at about 97%, no box or tools etc. seller is asking $900. Good or bad?
Wow! Used, abused, then cold blued.Not a bad price if as described but try to talk the owner downView attachment 891777. This cosmetically challenged but mechanically perfect 25-5 4" was $550 at a local gun show with rubber grips
I can’t imagine why I’d want a 8 3/8” barreled handgun, but price os probably okay.
And hunting. The long barrel provides a better sight radius for shots at 50 to 100 yards as well as maximizing bullet velocity and energy which can mean a quicker kill.Silhouette or target shooting was what they were built for. When matched with a load it likes, shooting off of a sandbag, you should be able to ring a steel plate @ 100 yards. Not too many folks like to do that these days, IMO.
I have several 8-3/8" barreled handguns, all Smiths. When things are clicking, they can shoot REALLY small groups. When it happens (rarely), I find it euphoric. Probably how a F1 driver feels when the car is powering through.
I like them all! I have three S&W 8 3/8' guns (a .357, a .41 Mag and a .44 Mag). I started out pretty early with long barrels and shot them well, then I discovered 4-6.5" guns shoot just as good.And hunting. The long barrel provides a better sight radius for shots at 50 to 100 yards as well as maximizing bullet velocity and energy which can mean a quicker kill.
Be advised that it was a common occurrence with the 25-5, that the bore didn’t jive with the internal cylinder dimensions, resulting in poor accuracy. I had one of those that I purchased new in 1980.Wow! Used, abused, then cold blued.![]()
Yes! I've got one that is pre-80 and one that is post - I forget the year.Be advised that it was a common occurrence with the 25-5, that the bore didn’t jive with the internal cylinder dimensions, resulting in poor accuracy. I had one of those that I purchased new in 1980.