29 vs 629

KnotRight

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2013
Messages
106
Reaction score
53
City & State/Province
Coastal GA
I am getting ready to put myself on a waiting list for either a 29 or a 629. if it is a newer gun, I think that I am leaning towards a 629 with a full lug. If I find a used 29 that is what I will get.

I like the wooden grips on the 29 and all new 629s have rubber grips.

Any input between the 6" models?
 
Well, the full lug feature on the m629 makes that model a m629 Classic. They still offer the straight m629 with no underlug.

For a time, S&W offered a m29 Classic as well. My brother had one and it was an excellent handgun. I still kick him for selling it, and kick myself for not being in a position to scoop it up...

In the looks department, I find that I like blued steel equally as much as stainless. I used to heavily favor stainless but have since grown very fond of blued steel, especially on the older models.

However, if you plan to carry your new to you 29/629 frequently I would vote for the durability of the stainless model. The fact is, blueing does wear with time in the holster...stainless does not. Some argue that wearing the brushed finish of a stainless Smith is wearing the original finish off. While technically speaking this is true, the bottom line is you don't have to worry about pitting and rust occurring when the finish starts to wear. From a collectors standpoint this is an issue.. For the every day guy like me, it is not. Different strokes...

But comparing 29 and 629, there really is no difference other than the material they are made from if we are speaking of -3 and later m29's. (I may be off on what revision the m29 was on when the 629 came out and ready to stand corrected if I am wrong) The 629 is literally the stainless steel twin to the m29 of the same vintage.

Grips: target grips look appealing, but for most people they really don't fit the hand very well. This becomes glaringly obvious when shooting powerful magnum handguns like 44's. Unless you have a large hand, you will notice that the revolver will have a tendency to flip in your hand mostly because your pinky doesn't come close to wrapping around the bottom of the grip to help control it. But this does not apply to every person, some like the classic target grips just fine, and that is OK. I am just speaking of my personal experience...Best advice I can offer in the grips is for you to handle a few and see what feels best in your hand. If possible, (and legal in your state) fire a few different models equipped with different grips. Grips can make or break a person's experience with a handgun like a 44mag. They matter more than you might think.

There are many companies that make grips much more fitted to the human hand that allow that last finger to help and keep things under control in your hand. Hogue, Altamont, Ahrends and many others offer "finger groove" grips in many different materials starting with basic yet very good functioning rubber, to exotic hardwood with checkering and so on. I have experienced a very noticeable improvement in recoil control switching from target grips to finger groove grips back to back on the same revolver.

And you can get nice wooden grips for any of the new Smiths if you prefer wood over rubber. The nice thing is you can keep the functionality of the finger groove grips and also retain the attractive looks of hardwood. These same companies also offer grips for the old square butt Smiths if you get a 29 with target grips and decide you don't like them.....

I have Altamont grips on a couple of my revolvers, my 4" m19, and my 5" 460. Couldn't be happier.. and the cool thing about Altamont is you can get them with the S&W medallions for an extra few bucks.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Ride-Red, I wish there was somewhere around here I could shoot a 29 or 629. I think that I am going to order some Altamont grips for my 640 and 642 as well as my 686. As you can see, I do like the SS guns. Through in there a 66 2 2/3" but like the rubber grips on that gun.

I do reload and have a 6" SBH in 44 mag but just what a double action 44 and always wanted a S&W 44. And yes the grips make a big difference. I had rubber grips on the SBH and change back to the wooden grips. The original grips let the gun roll up which helped with the recoil.
 
Last edited:
The rubber grips do have an edge in function... the rubber helps dampen recoil a bit.. And the added grippy-ness of rubber grips, particularly Hogue really enhances the control you have.. It almost "sticks" to your hand.

I have a 629 Classic with a 6.5" bbl. It came with a Hogue black rubber Monogrip. I switched to what is either a factory blemish Altamont or an Altamont imitator and I did find it a bit sharper in recoil, but not unbearable compared to the black rubber Hogue.

It is a 44 after all.. ;)
 
I just acquired a 629 to go with my 686. If nothing else stainless guns are a whole lot easier to clean and minor scratches polish out.
Not a fan of finger grooves so the smooth Hogue rubber grips work for me.
 
Intended use (I'm not a collector and all my guns are shooters):
1. Purty & you don't mind finish wear: blue.

2. Outdoor & exposed to the elements: stainless.

3: I agree with what Red-Ride 350r said about grips.
And: I like the new S&W thin wood grips. They fit my hand well and are way less painful when shooting powerful loads.
That said, my stainless field guns have rubber grips, such as the Hogue. I backpack in the Colorado Rockies a lot, and in the Idaho back country. Colorado does not allow non-residents to carry concealed, and that means my side arm must be carried exposed to the elements. For that I choose stainless.
629-3 Mountain Gun small.jpg S&W 629 Mountain Gun

S&W 29-2 & 29 30.jpg S&W 29-2 on the left. A field gun. Note grips.

S&W 27-8 30.jpg My 27 with the new style S&W grips. I really like them.
 
S&W does still offer the Model 29 Classic. I bought one about 3 weeks ago with the 6.5" barrel and blued finish. It only comes blued, but you can get a different barrel length. If you are into nostalgia, the 6.5" Model 29 was "Dirty Harry's" handgun of choice. The Model 29 Classic is pretty much a replica of that iconic gun.
 
I own both the full under lugged and the originals. I much prefer the square butted guns(older) than the newer round butted(which have all been converted to square butt with different grips), I have big hands(I wish S&W had never gone to the round butt guns). They have no place in my safe other than maybe concealment purposes(small J frames)? I turned 66 last August so, maybe that influences my opinions, some?
Steve
 
Last edited:
S&W does still offer the Model 29 Classic. I bought one about 3 weeks ago with the 6.5" barrel and blued finish. It only comes blued, but you can get a different barrel length. If you are into nostalgia, the 6.5" Model 29 was "Dirty Harry's" handgun of choice. The Model 29 Classic is pretty much a replica of that iconic gun.

OK, I think there is some confusion between the old model 29 Classic and the "Classic" line of guns S&W is currently offering today.. And understandably so..especially when the S&W website itself does not differentiate the 629 and 629 Classic on their web page, they are all referred to as model 629. And further adding to the less than calrity is the new "Classic" line whereas they offer the model 29 (blued with no underlug, just a shrouded extractor) model 10, 36 and a few others.

The 29 Classic I am referring to is a model 29 but with a full underlug. I am certain that model has been discontinued. It had the word "Classic" etched on the side of the barrel just as the full underlug version version 629 currently does.. Making it a 629 Classic.

Here is Smith's current "Classic" line: Classics - Smith & Wesson

Note pics: the blued model 29 Classic and the stainless model 629 Classic. 629 Classic is still currently available. The 29 Classic is no longer available.
 

Attachments

  • classic.jpeg
    classic.jpeg
    4.8 KB
  • 400px-SW-629.jpg
    400px-SW-629.jpg
    19.8 KB
Order a 629 5" Classic today and it will be here on Monday or Tuesday.

Now to find some more 44 mag and special cases to reload.
 
I have a 6 inch 629-1. It's the only 29 variant I've ever shot, but wouldn't sell it for anything. I have a light load I can shoot for hours.
 
My 29 has recessed cylinders for the case heads to sit down in. 629 does not?
 
My 29 has recessed cylinders for the case heads to sit down in. 629 does not?

My 629 is pinned and recessed

629_03_zpsbff231ef.jpg
 
Do you really think that makes a difference?
Steve

Recessed cylinders don't, but the pinned barrels are felt to be less likely to un-turn. I don't know though. I read that and didn't put a lot into it.
 
Boys you got to stop the posting of the old 29s. I wanted one but could not find one at a price that I would afford. Now that i have a 629, I will find a half a dozen of them. You are driving me crazy!!!!

I guess the only way to get one was to buy the 629 and then they will show up.
 
Recessed cylinders don't, but the pinned barrels are felt to be less likely to un-turn. I don't know though. I read that and didn't put a lot into it.

If that were true, S&W would never have stopped using them, and EVERY revolver manufacturer would also use them!

I like both 29's and 629's. Here is a 29-3 I bought brand new in 1987...I've used it a lot, but it still looks/shoots great. The targets came on it, but I only put them on for the photo!
Model29-3L_zpsc42d0c4c.jpg

Model29-3R_zpsd211034c.jpg
 
If that were true, S&W would never have stopped using them, and EVERY revolver manufacturer would also use them!

I like both 29's and 629's. Here is a 29-3 I bought brand new in 1987...I've used it a lot, but it still looks/shoots great. The targets came on it, but I only put them on for the photo!
Model29-3L_zpsc42d0c4c.jpg

Model29-3R_zpsd211034c.jpg

I think it depends who you ask too. I just don't know up or down on the pinned barrels, but if have read about folks who swear by them, and insist they have non pinned barreled guns where the barrel came loose.

Other folks own more then a few S&Ws that have barrels that aren't pinned and have never had an issue, and swear by them.

I have 4 pinned and recessed, and two that are not, I don't get to shoot a lot, so I'll probably never shoot my 686 or 629-1 loose, but if I do I'll let you know.

By the way, your 29-3 is absolutely beautiful. A. Model 29 is on my list, and if it is as nice as yours, I'll have no problem going with a nicer -3 over a -2.
 
Last edited:
Most people think the P&R S&W revolvers were made during a time when S&W had more old school craftsman so that is what a lot of S&W collectors like. I've never seen proof that the pinned barrel was better than non pinned barrels. The P&R were just made before the days of cost cutting in production at S&W and they are therefore felt to be better.
 
Boys you got to stop the posting of the old 29s. I wanted one but could not find one at a price that I would afford. Now that i have a 629, I will find a half a dozen of them. You are driving me crazy!!!!

I guess the only way to get one was to buy the 629 and then they will show up.


Ill just leave this here.. ;) :D

29-2, 4", P&R, 2-T's, Factory hardwood combat grips. :)
 

Attachments

  • Resampled_2013-02-22_18-51-55_631.jpg
    Resampled_2013-02-22_18-51-55_631.jpg
    82.9 KB
Last edited:
Nice wood!

Scored those completely by accident. Didn't have any idea how desirable they are at the time when I got them..and neither did my LGS... He tossed them in for $25 extra when I picked up the m29. :cool:


That 29 came with Target grips, box, docs (including blank warrantee card) and cleaning rod. I saw the N-frame combats under the glass and thought they were worth the risk of $25 to get some kind of finger groove grips on it. I was a dyed in the wool Hogue fan at the time! LOL!

Got the whole package for what he could have charged just for the revolver by itself, maybe even less.
 
That's the deal of the century, I got these today for considerably more and felt like I got a good deal.
 
After a long wait, my 629 5" Classic came in today. :D

Had to add it to the collection of stainless steel guns. There are S&Ws, Rugers, Mitchell Arms, NAA, Walther and a Springfield in there.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top