.327 Federal Magnum Models

[MarkAlt]

There are a few threads discussing the .327, but I wanted to pose a unique question.

Decided that I want a (preferably) Smith in this caliber. I don't think any major manufacturer, except Ruger, is currently producing a revolver in this caliber. Ammo is readily available and not outrageously priced.

Looks like there's the 632, when they're available, at a 4-figure+ price.

Does anyone know of other Smith models in this caliber? Any sources for them? I didn't check today, but haven't even seen one on GB lately.

Thanks!

 

[Macinaw]

Just some eye candy for you. If you can find one; you will enjoy the .32 caliber. This is a 632 Pro . What isn't to love about a six shot J frame?

 

[HarrishMasher]

Smith made two models in the caliber. Both designated as model 632.

One is a 632 Pro Series which looks exactly like the 640 Pro Series.

The other is the 632 Carry Comp which is pictured above. I want one! But they are always over $1K.

I shot my 432PD in 32 H&R Mag today for the first time and loved it!
http://smith-wessonforum.com/s-w-revolvers-1980-present/404290-shot-my-32mag-432pd-woohoo-review-range-report-plus-m-p340-comparison.html
I really love this round and would mainly fire the 32mag out of a 632. Im really want an all steel 3" revolver chambered in 32 Mag. They really just don't exist and I don't see anyone rushing to make one

 

[629shooter]

They are very hard to find. I'm on the hunt for a decent deal on a 632 Pro myself.

 

[at_liberty]

What isn't to love about a six shot J frame?

The cost.$$$ These Smith versions and some of the Rugers will price themselves to the point where no one is shooting the caliber except existing owners who wanted more than an investment and safe queen. I paid a bunch for my Ruger SP101, and the price of Smiths is just crazy.

 

[MarkAlt]

Ok... just wanted to be sure I wasn't missing anything in the Smith lineup.

There are plenty of the Ruger Single Sevens (SA) at great prices, but that appears to be the only production choice. Might be a good one at the plentiful low prices out there.

Thanks for the info!

 

[at_liberty]

Ok... just wanted to be sure I wasn't missing anything in the Smith lineup.

There are plenty of the Ruger Single Sevens (SA) at great prices, but that appears to be the only production choice. Might be a good one at the plentiful low prices out there.

Thanks for the info!

On the Rugers, there are only 4500 guns, not all produced yet, likely 1500 of each of three barrel lengths, made for Lipsey's alone, so if interested, be aware that the supply is quite finite and in a time window.

 

[mag318]

It's a shame that the demand and sales were so bad for the 632s they were discontinued, now they bring a premium. Same with the Ruger SP101s and Ruger developed the 327 Magnum with Federal. At least the Lipsey special Ruger Single Sevens are selling well so this chambering is still alive and kicking. I look forward to more Lipsey specials in this calibre but I don't think Smith or Ruger will bring back standard production revolvers in 327 back unless they feel there is a strong demand for them.
If you like this very versatile chambering like I do let the manufacturers know your feelings. I also suggest you grab a Single Seven while they're still available.

 

[vigil617]

Just remember, since it's confusing as all get-out, that "632" is the numerical designation for a series of 32 Magnum and a series of 327 Magnum revolvers from Smith & Wesson.

"Carry Comp" (or "-1") or "Pro" (or "-2) after the 632 designation are the 327 magnum models.

"632" alone is the 32 Magnum (a.k.a. 32 H&R Magnum) model.

I had the hardest time getting used to this -- and there is a price difference between the two series....

 

[vigil617]

They are very hard to find. I'm on the hunt for a decent deal on a 632 Pro myself.

You are not alone, sir!

I followed one recently in a penny auction on GunAuction that sold for about $980 after two weeks on the site, and with over 50 offers. (This was the least expensive price for a 632 Pro that I have seen.) The final bid was a "proxy" bid that indicated the buyer had set a higher offer that was not reached, so I don't know how much it would have cost to beat it. I didn't have that kind of money, but the buyer got a GREAT buy on a GREAT revolver, and I hope it was one of our Forum members.

 

[Dale53]

After having an opportunity to shoot this
REALLY good concept in a Federal .327 Smith, this is EXACTLY what I would do. We are going into winter and it would be good to get your order in and "gitter done":

http://smith-wessonforum.com/s-w-revolvers-1980-present/260686-project-616-a.html

This is the perfect size for a real USING revolver for range, field, or home use.

Since Smith is not going to do it for us, then I suggest anyone wanting one go the custom route.

fwiw
Dale53

 

[vigil617]

After having an opportunity to shoot this
REALLY good concept in a Federal .327 Smith, this is EXACTLY what I would do. We are going into winter and it would be good to get your order in and "gitter done":

http://smith-wessonforum.com/s-w-revolvers-1980-present/260686-project-616-a.html

This is the perfect size for a real USING revolver for range, field, or home use.

Since Smith is not going to do it for us, then I suggest anyone wanting one go the custom route.

fwiw
Dale53

And it's a K-frame, which has been recommended by several members on here, as the ultimate .327 magnum size.

 

[MarkAlt]

Thanks for the info and details on the 632. The Project 616 looks interesting, but then I need to find a 16!

All signs point to the inexpensive little Single Seven as an entry to this cartridge.

 

[505Gibbs]

FWIW - S&W made a satin version of the pro as a distributor special for Sports South. Features are the same on both pieces except of black vs. satin stainless.

 

[at_liberty]

Thanks for the info and details on the 632. The Project 616 looks interesting, but then I need to find a 16!

All signs point to the inexpensive little Single Seven as an entry to this cartridge.

I had never handled a Single series gun before and was surprised how big my Single Seven is, bought from pictures alone.

 

[vigil617]

Thanks for the info and details on the 632. The Project 616 looks interesting, but then I need to find a 16!

All signs point to the inexpensive little Single Seven as an entry to this cartridge.

Yep, the Model 16-4's (the 32 Magnum model) that I have seen for sale lately, that would need to have each chamber reamed deeper to accept the 327 magnum cartridge, are selling for well over a grand.

I hope S&W will watch how Ruger's Single Seven does in the market, and maybe if it is successful, will play catch-up ball with a new model for those of us that would like to stick with "our" brand.

 

[at_liberty]

And it's a K-frame, which has been recommended by several members on here, as the ultimate .327 magnum size.

I think that honor would go to the Ruger SP101, maxed out at 6 rounds without a forced fit or compromised design. It is an outstanding belt carry.

The S&W Model 60 Pro Series is another possibility, since I have one and think of it as the peer of the SP101 in 357. I expect that it too would accommodate 6 rounds of 327. The difference is that S&W will never join the game, while Ruger is hearing lots of noise about restoring the 327 SP101 to the line, even doing it in the new 4" platform, currently only 357.

 

[bobf]

To further confuse the 632-1 and -2 they are both "pro series" but only the -2 is marked as such.

 

[Green Frog]

As the guy who started the Project 616 thread and the accompanying madness, I still think of it as "the gun S&W never made but should have." As a factory product, it should be very simple to produce with only minimal changes in tooling from existing lines... after all, if I could gather up the parts aftermarket and pay to have it built for a fairly reasonable sum, it shouldn't be that hard for the professionals at S&W with a whole factory full of stuff to "git 'er done!" JMHO, S&W's MMV!

Froggie

 

[Goblin]

Froggie, is the 616 complete?