IMHO:
It wouldn't bother me in the least to run those cast bullets the op has using 6.8gr of unique.
As others have stated, lee only parrots what it can find for reloading data from multiple sources.
Why "lee", speer & alliant have different (6.0gr)/newer data.
The last of what I consider the great free manuals put out by alliant powder corp. It was printed in 2005
http://www.castpics.net/LoadData/Freebies/RM/Alliant/Alliant_2005.pdf
Hense the lee 2nd edition parroting alliant with a 357mag/158gr swc/6.8gr of unique load.
The next manual put out by alliant in 2008 lists a "SPEER" 158gr swc lead bullet and a 6.0gr max load of unique.
http://www.castpics.net/LoadData/Freebies/RM/Alliant/Alliant_2008.pdf
Alliant and speer were and still are owned by the same corporation starting in 2008. Alliant quit using generic bullet data and started using speer bullets for all their data. Why help the opposition out giving everyone data to use the other guys bullets????
The end result is starting in 2008 and to this day alliant uses data for the speer lead swc. The speer lead swc happens to be a soft swaged bullet that can't be driven/pushed hard.
So now speer/alliant/lee uses the soft swaged lead bullet data.
The op has a hard cast 18bhn bullet, not a soft speer swaged lead 7/8bhn bullet.
It has nothing to do with lawyers or old vs new pressure measuring equipment. Alliant simply started testing/using a company owned (speer) soft swaged lead bullet for their data instead of the older (pre-2008) hard cast lead swc data.
That soft speer swaged lead swc simply can't handle the pressures of the max/hot unique 6.8gr loads. Push a soft lead bullet too hard and words like leading, keyholing & patterns instead of groups start becoming more common in the reloaders volcaulary.