.38 Special, K frame, with 3" barrel

[M3Stuart]

Starting from "where we are", i.e. with only the current Model 64 and 67 K frame, I would vote for a 3" barrel variant.

Personally, I prefer the adjustable sights, but for concealed carry, many would prefer the fixed sights of the 64.

Here's my rationale: I have a 15-2 and 67-1. These have the older, narrow, barrels. I've handled, and passed on the new 67 because it has the heavy barrel. The balance is totally 'off' on it. The 3" 686 is too heavy by at least 5 ounces. The new 60 3" is too light for comfortable shooting of +P or .357 (not that I care much for .357 in J's or K's anyway).

I have a 3" model 10 and 2.5" 66 and they sit in the 'sweet spot' around 30 ounces. They're both fine out to 50'. They're not going to bring back the 66 due to forcing cone issues - that's fine, the K's are kind of light for .357 recoil anyway.

In summary; K frame, 3", .38 Special +P, stainless, round butt, front night sight. Call it whatever you want.

 

[KLYDE]

M3,
I'd be on board for one of those critters. I have several K's, both stainless and blue. All are older forged pre MIM and lock guns. Usually carry the 2" or 3" 64.

Lately I have been giving thought about the increasing scarcity and value increase of these guns. You have to basically have the mind set that any gun involved in a self defense situation will be gone or at least damaged while in custody. Best to look at a carry gun as disposable. I really don't want to "dispose" of any of my nice older Smiths.

A new 64 3" as you described would fill the billet. This would be doable as the platform is still in production. How about it S&W?

 

[tekarra]

I sure like my 3" 65 and with it shoot mostly .38. I could go for a 3" 64 as well.