3913 vs. 3953

[petepeterson]

Does anyone own both, and if so which one do you prefer? Of the two, which is more valuable to own, assuming similar condition.

I frequently carry my 3913 (with no complaints), but I'm intrigued by the slimmer, snag-free profile and DAO trigger of the 3953, which I heard is pretty nice.

 

[ColbyBruce]

I have owned both at one time

I have owned two S&W 3913 pistols, two S&W 908 pistols, and one S&W 3953. I now only have the 3953. I like the lack of decocker levers as it reduces the weight and thickness of the gun. I like the consistant DAO trigger pull. I had a S&W 5946 that introduced me to the DAO trigger. I do wish it had a repeat pull capability though.

In my area, the S&W DAO pistols are not popular and do not command high prices. I have about $325.00 in mine (I traded for it) and honestly don't think it would bring $300.00 locally.

I understand the factory converted 3913/3914 pistols to DAO and those did have a repeat pull trigger.

My 908 pistols.

My first 3913.

Second 3913.

The 3953.

 

[red feather]

I have a 3914 tacl. a 3913 and the 3953. I put Wolfe spring in the 3953 and the trigger is about perfect. I like the 3914 better than the 3913. I
think I'll end up selling the 3913.

 

[Jim PHL]

I have a 3913, a 3913NL and a 3953 and love them all. I have had others of each in the past as well. The 39xx are truly some of the best compact 9mm's ever. If I had to choose one over the other I'm not sure what I would do. (Except maybe start questioning why I HAD to choose!)

I will say I think the comments regarding the DAO being harder to shoot accurately are a little overblown. I think with enough practice the 3953 is capable of surprising accuracy. (Perhaps the 3913 in SA might be easier to shoot well - but the 3953 is certainly capable.) The 3953 is obviously a little slimmer without the slide-mounted decockers/safeties but those safeties certainly don't make the 3913's un-carryable! Also note the DAO trigger of the 3953 (at least on mine) is is shorter and lighter than the DA first shot on the 3913's.

 

[shawn mccarver]

For all sorts of reasons, I preferred the 3953 over the 3913. And that was before the current thinking concerning favoring a DAO for a defense pistol.

 

[Nico Testosteros]

Oh man, y'all have me on the lookout for a 3953 now.

 

[waffenmac]

The DAO only S&W pistols do get a bad wrap about accuracy. I used a 5946 to win a combat shoot at our range out of 40 shooters and mine was the only old gun there, plenty of xds glocks 1911s and fns . I have a 4053 and a 4013tsw and I like the Dao more.

 

[brentb636]

The DAO only S&W pistols do get a bad wrap about accuracy. I used a 5946 to win a combat shoot at our range out of 40 shooters and mine was the only old gun there, plenty of xds glocks 1911s and fns . I have a 4053 and a 4013tsw and I like the Dao more.

I had a SIG P239 SAS , DAK trigger that was a smart looking pistol, and shot well. I sold it because the DAK trigger was a lot different than my other guns ( DA/SA) and I decided that all my carry guns would be DA/SA for relative consistent performance. After the first magazine, though, I shot the DAK just as well as any of the others. In an SD situation, though, I want the trigger setup that I've trained with, optimally.

Brent

 

[TAROMAN]

I had a 3913 and, as stated above, the double decocking levers were the reason I sold it.
Couldn't find a 3953, so went with a Kahr instead.

 

[gasaman]

I had a 3913 sold it and replaced it with a CS9D. I also had a CS45 which also got sold and it's replacement is a 4553TSW pre-rail.
I just couldn't adjust well going from DA 1st rd to SA on the remaining.

 

[Golddog]

I've owned both a 3953 and a 3913. They had the worst triggers of any of the more than 100 handguns I've owned - utterly unusable. Why buy guns that require dozens of hours and many rounds of expensive ammo to master when there are plenty of firearms easy to shoot right out of the box?

 

[Bib]

How difficult would it be to convert a 3913LS to DAO? Are the parts available from S&W?

 

[GaryS]

I inquired to S&W about doing the conversion on my 3913 TSW and they stated that the performance shop still does the conversion. This was 3 weeks ago

Did they give you any idea about cost and time?

 

[Jaymo]

Wonder if they would convert my 6946 to DAO?

 

[GaryS]

Thank you. I'm more inclined at this point to call and see if I can order a left side only safety/decocker lever for my 3913TSW. Being right handed, I don't need the ambi version.

I did not ask specifically about time or cost, I am sorry. They said they could convert any TDA to DAO so I would think yes on yours Jaymo, but isnt the 6946 already a DAO pistol?

 

[Charlie111]

I have had both a 3913 and a 3953. I sold my 3953 and decided to keep the 3913 as it has the same method of operation as my 3906. Old habits die hard.

 

[deanodog]

My 6946

 

[prescobd]

Also consider the 3914DAO. I have one but haven't yet fired it. Same snag free design as the 3953. Same slide as a 3913/3914 so should be easier to find holsters that fit if a restraining strap is required. I've wondered why the NYPD insisted on a 3914DAO and not a 3913DAO?

 

[fotoman12001]

I prefer the 3953

I plan on selling my 3913 soon. I just don't care for safeties in that position.

 

[DanP7]

There is nothing wrong with owning both, but I feel that the triggers are so radically different between the two, that one is best picking between the two and sticking with it. This might not be evident in casual plinking or paper shooting at the local range, but when you add a shot timer, drawing from concealment, movement, and multiple targets, a familiar trigger becomes something you start to lean on for consistency more and more.


Personally, I feel that the 53 is just as good as the 13, if not better with the slimmer profile, the 13 is still the better configuration for me at least. I use the gun as my "deep cover" gun, so that means that sometimes I am temporarily using an unconventional carry method,, like a pocket, or "Mexican" carry under a button up shirt, etc. While not ideal, this is usually only temporary and better than carrying no gun. The 13 offers three advantages for me.....first, I can set the safety on while I position the gun, then flick it off once it is in position. (3rd gens have what I call an "administrative safety" for safer handling, and should not be used liked a 1911's safety). The long DA first pull also is safer for unconventional carry. The third benefit is the short reset that the 3rd gen is famous for. If I have to pull my gun and shoot, the body on the receiving end is probably goin to be receiving at least half of the rounds in the magazine, if not all of them. The 13 is a real speed demon at emptying all 9 rounds in a short amount of time with a good degree of controllability. The 53 with it's longer reset is not as "fast" as a 13 or other TDA 3rd gen, at least in my hands.

This at least reflects my needs. The 53's and similar DA third gems are excellent. I'm not a huge TDA fan either, as my everyday primary carry guns are glocks with a very consistent trigger. But given the carry circumstances and my practice routine, my muscle memory seems to adapt to the 13's TDA as needed without issue. As I get more experience with the third gens, I'm feelin that the DAO's are best in the full size grip guns where you can get a better grip on them, like the full size 40's. YMMV, so pick the gun that is right for you. The nice thing about third gens is that there is a configuration for everybody, and they are all top notch excellent and high quality from the performance center guns, down to the homely 910

 

[18DAI]

I would agree with DanP7. The triggers are very different between the two models.

In fact I recently shot my NIB 3954 alongside my early 3914 carry gun and was able to compare and contrast the two models.

I've often read that the 3rd gen DAO triggers are "revolver like". That was not my impression. The DAO trigger on my 3954 was smooth, but a little long and a bit heavy, to me. Several times I also unintentionally triggered second shots with the DAO 3954 while coming out of recoil. Something that I'd only previously done while trying striker fired handguns.

I was also able to shoot the TDA 3914 both faster and more accurately than I was the DAO 3954.

Don't get me wrong, the 3954 is a fine pistol. Head and shoulders above any current production handguns today, IMO. It is just that between the two actions I prefer the TDA 39XX series guns.

As far as which is worth more, the 3954 being produced in smaller numbers is probably worth the most of the 39XX series guns. Generally I think 3913's bring more money than 3953's. I don't know why. The 3914, a favorite of mine usually can be found very cheaply. Much less than the other models go for. Again I have no idea why. Hope this helps!

Happy Thanksgiving everyone! Regards 18DAI

 

[James&theGiant1911]

Almost all Smith and Wesson TDA pistols with safeties bring more money than their slick sided DAO pistols. Do not know why this is but it is and the Tactical versions of the 3913/3914 bring even more based upon condition. Try to find a pristine tactical 3913/3914 is like finding a needle in a haystack. Most all of them have carry wear and you do not see that many of them become available very often.

 

[GaryS]

The last high quality batch I saw was from the CA Department of Corrections. There were some 6906s and 3913s available in early to mid 2012. I bought my 3913 from a private party and I don't know where he got it.

A number of members here have those guns. Most bought them from various wholesalers and many of them got them complete with box and papers. Mine had neither, but the gun looks as if it was hardly, if ever, carried.

Other than that and a 6906 that was issued to a Capt. on a state college PD, most of them do show signs of being carried a lot. The 6906 came with box, papers, three magazines, and a couple of holsters. It had no appreciable wear.

People tend to hold on to them once they have them.

Almost all Smith and Wesson TDA pistols with safeties bring more money than their slick sided DAO pistols. Do not know why this is but it is and the Tactical versions of the 3913/3914 bring even more based upon condition. Try to find a pristine tactical 3913/3914 is like finding a needle in a haystack. Most all of them have carry wear and you do not see that many of them become available very often.

 

[James&theGiant1911]

What good is this thread without more pics,

Here is my 3913TSW, I would put it in the top 10 percent of all 3913TSWs, maybe top 5 percent.

 

[GaryS]

That's a nice pre rail 3913TSW. Did you put the CS9 style bottom plates on or did it come that way?


Here's a picture of mine.

This is my primary self defense carry gun.

I've added night sights and slightly slimmed the ambi safety profile since this picture was taken.

 

[James&theGiant1911]

That's a nice pre rail 3913TSW. Did you put the CS9 style bottom plates on or did it come that way?


Here's a picture of mine.

This is my primary self defense carry gun.

It came that way but I have the Smith and Wesson bottom plates if I want to convert them back in. My Performance Center Shorty 40 came with two mags, one curved plate and one standard. I like the feeling of the curved plates better.

 

[GaryS]

It's all personal preference. I had the curved bottom plates on my CS9 and 3913, but always as if the "hook" was hanging up my cover clothing and I risked exposing the handle of the gun.

In my state, that can cause significant difficult with the local PD and the issuing PD.

It came that way but I have the Smith and Wesson bottom plates if I want to convert them back in. My Performance Center Shorty 40 came with two mags, one curved plate and one standard. I like the feeling of the curved plates better.

 

[nocents]

That's a nice pre rail 3913TSW. Did you put the CS9 style bottom plates on or did it come that way?


Here's a picture of mine.

This is my primary self defense carry gun.

I've added night sights and slightly slimmed the ambi safety profile since this picture was taken.

pretty fancy gun stand......I may have to copy that.....I already have a small sheet of 1/4" lexan

 

[GaryS]

pretty fancy gun stand......I may have to copy that.....I already have a small sheet of 1/4" lexan

Feel free. I bought them online, but can't for the life of me remember where. It's part of a pair that are designed to hold long guns.

 

[fpuhan]

**BUMP**

I've been looking at 3913/3914/3953/908's for a while. There seems to be a lot of online activity selling the 3913 (especially the Ladysmith model). I admit, I'm intrigued.

Today, I went to the range and shot my SIG Sauer P290RS, which is a compact, DAO single stack pistol. It's taken a back seat to my other pistols, as it feels a bit too heavy for IWB (and I have P938s for that task), and the long trigger pull finds me all over the paper.

I'm thinking of putting it up for sale. Maybe I could replace it with a 3953? Reading this thread (again) makes me think the 3953 would be a better choice than the 3913/3914. I also looked into the double stack, but that doesn't seem to resonate with me.