RDub
Member
Hello
Well I started out with the idea that I could kill two birds with one stone, and that is test a new bullet, that being the 180gr. HSM Plated FN, and test these new powders, Sport Pistol, IMR Target, 244, and 572. Just a quick look, nothing too detailed.
Shooting was done with a Sigma 40F off of a Caldwell Pistol Rest at 25 yards. Velocity data taken with an Oehler Mod 33 chronograph. Skyscreens centered 10' from muzzle. Temps recorded on target data.
Well as you can see, this gun does not like the 180gr. HSM Plated FN at all. It's nothing to look at, but here is the target;
Target #9 and 13 look promising, but a re-shoot will verify. BE-86 and CFE Pistol have always shot neck and neck with each other, but this time that was not the case..
But the ballistic data is still valuable.
This bullet didn't do any better in the 10mm either, even with an aftermarket button rifled barrel. You can check that out here if curious;
180gr FMJ and Plated FN with Sport Pistol, IMR Target, 244 and 572 - Reloading 10mm ammo - 10mm-firearms.com
Some might recall a study I did with 180gr FMJ in the .40 S&W..
http://smith-wessonforum.com/reloading/531162-sigma-40f-loading-180gr-fmj.html
Well, what I did is take the graph from that study and insert the new data on it.
The powders in Red are the new ones, and the charges written in Red are the loads recently shot on the above target.
What we see is the new powders, excepting 572, have a burn rate that is very close to each other, very similar to Bullseye and N320. 572 is down there around Unique and Herco.
In the 10mm, IMR Target and 244 did well. I believe shooters are going to like these two once they become more available.
These two also did well with the 38 Special 158gr LRN trials.
http://smith-wessonforum.com/reloading/574534-38-spcl-158gr-lrn-some-new-powders.html
Well that's it for now. Hope this was helpful. I would like to re-shoot this with real 180gr FMJ bullets. We'll see..
Well I started out with the idea that I could kill two birds with one stone, and that is test a new bullet, that being the 180gr. HSM Plated FN, and test these new powders, Sport Pistol, IMR Target, 244, and 572. Just a quick look, nothing too detailed.
Shooting was done with a Sigma 40F off of a Caldwell Pistol Rest at 25 yards. Velocity data taken with an Oehler Mod 33 chronograph. Skyscreens centered 10' from muzzle. Temps recorded on target data.
Well as you can see, this gun does not like the 180gr. HSM Plated FN at all. It's nothing to look at, but here is the target;

Target #9 and 13 look promising, but a re-shoot will verify. BE-86 and CFE Pistol have always shot neck and neck with each other, but this time that was not the case..
But the ballistic data is still valuable.
This bullet didn't do any better in the 10mm either, even with an aftermarket button rifled barrel. You can check that out here if curious;
180gr FMJ and Plated FN with Sport Pistol, IMR Target, 244 and 572 - Reloading 10mm ammo - 10mm-firearms.com
Some might recall a study I did with 180gr FMJ in the .40 S&W..
http://smith-wessonforum.com/reloading/531162-sigma-40f-loading-180gr-fmj.html
Well, what I did is take the graph from that study and insert the new data on it.
The powders in Red are the new ones, and the charges written in Red are the loads recently shot on the above target.

What we see is the new powders, excepting 572, have a burn rate that is very close to each other, very similar to Bullseye and N320. 572 is down there around Unique and Herco.
In the 10mm, IMR Target and 244 did well. I believe shooters are going to like these two once they become more available.
These two also did well with the 38 Special 158gr LRN trials.
http://smith-wessonforum.com/reloading/574534-38-spcl-158gr-lrn-some-new-powders.html
Well that's it for now. Hope this was helpful. I would like to re-shoot this with real 180gr FMJ bullets. We'll see..