40 S&W Shield Carry ammo?

Fchewy

Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Messages
181
Reaction score
67
Location
NC
My Shield has approx 200 rounds of various ammo through it and it has been great no bulging cases or any negative issues, that being said i am looking to start using it for carry and am looking into carry ammo, i have put a few rounds of Winchester Ranger 155's through it and some Hornaday XTP's all in 180gr.
What do you recommend or carry in yours? Thanks.
 
Register to hide this ad
Whatever JHP ammo shoots to point of aim and works through you gun without issue. The bigger the bullet, the less necessary it is to spend $2/round to trust your life on.
 
I like Speer Gold Dot 165 gr for my 40C. I also like Federal HST & Hornady Critical Duty.
 
I would carry 165 grain hardball ammo. The slightly lighter bullet is easier to control. The hardball is more reliable and less expensive.
 
I carry 180 gr Speer gold dots in my shield (40). Got my wife 147 gr gold dots for her nano and I carry gold dots in my glock 36. 230 gr in that.

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Another vote here for the Federal HST 165gr. Buy it in the 50 round box, it is much cheaper. SGammo usually has 50 round boxes of SD ammo.
 
DONT use FMJ for personal defense. Any of the better stuff like , PDX1, Gold Dot, Hornady Critical Defense, etc... Will be great. .
I would carry 165 grain hardball ammo. The slightly lighter bullet is easier to control. The hardball is more reliable and less expensive.
 
Last edited:
Over penitration and the whole evolution of the personal defense hollow point made huge advancements with bonded and controlled expansion in just the last 10 years let alone the last 100 years. No law enforcements in the country allows the use of fmj and the military doesn't use the FMJ because its a superior design. No one would ever use a FMJ in a 40 S&W for defense considering the caliber round itself was designed for the hollow point. The 45acp is the only FMJ that is close to being safe to not over penetrate. You can drive with your feet but that doesn't make it a good idea. There is not one tactical school that would consider a FMJ in a 9mm or 40s&w a acceptable personal defense bullet.

Check out the 165 Hornady Critical Defese. It has 500+ ftlbs of energy. It feeds reliable in about everything I have seen and also tests very well.
http://youtu.be/tkOV3MJI1FU



Why not? Hardball ammo has been protecting people for more than 100 years.

I don't really care what you want to use, but I wouldn't tell anyone that if they don't use >$1/round ammo they're wrong.
 
Last edited:
Speer Gold Dot 180 gr and Federal Hydra Shot 180 gr. (I didn't learn the HSTs were superior until after I bought the Hyrda's. Oh well...)
 
Speer Gold dot make excellent SD ammo. So does Federal HXT and Winchester Ranger

Our organs, except for the brain, are very very good at stretching. Under 2000 fps bullets create more of stretch cavity than a permanent one. Often times you can't see a difference in bullet cavities from 32 to 45. Our tissue stretches and then bounces back. This of course is why most people carry HP ammo. It's about ammo quality and shot placement. Of course luck plays into it as well.

Don't just buy any HP because it hit where you aim. Just because it has a hole doesn't mean it will act like a hollow point should. If you don't believe me try Brown Bear, Aguilla, or an number of other economy HP rounds. Test after test has proven that they don't expend reliably. Most just deform and act as fmj. It's one thing if you practice with $1/round, but you're not. You're only shooting to make sure it functions and then carrying it. I'll shoot a 100 rounds of Speer Gold dot and the rest I carry. Comes out to be able $70 for 3 boxes.


Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Federal HST 180 grain.

After reasearching a lot of rounds this one is the perfect balance between expansion and penetration for me.
 
...military doesn't use the FMJ because its a superior design.
But they do use it don't they. I find it funny how people will rant on and on about how the military uses this gun or that, but then they try to say how their round of choice is so poor.

No one would ever use a FMJ in a 40 S&W for defense considering the caliber round itself was designed for the hollow point.
And yet it is used.

There is not one tactical school that would consider a FMJ in a 9mm or 40s&w a acceptable personal defense bullet.
Hmm, guess you don't know too many schools then do you? I know at least two that would.

Like I said before, if you want to carry hollow points that's fine. Larger is better. There's no denying that. If a hollow point expands, then it offers a better possibility of transferring all it's energy; that's good. Even so, that doesn't mean hardball is useless. Hardball works. Hollow points might be better, but I would never tell anyone, "If you don't have hollow points you shouldn't carry."

The truth about self-defense shooting is that misses are far more dangerous than over-penetration. Rule 4: be aware of your target and what's in line with it.
 
Hmm, guess you don't know too many schools then do you? I know at least two that would.

Yes, I sure do. Been to Gunsite 2 times as well as attended other professional training over the years. I also was a sponsored IPSC Shooters for many years.

I can't believe with all the information we have these days that this topic would ever need to be discussed??? .....but here we are.:confused:

NO tactical training schools recommend to police or civilian the use of FMJ over a modern hollow point in the 9mm or 40s&w.

Tell me the names of the two schools you know about that recomend FMJ with the 9mm and 40S&W for personal defense ammo??????????
. I'll save you the time, there isn't any.


If you think the military is purposely choosing to use FMJ for any other reason than "The Hague Convention", your sadly misinformed. There is no way the military uses the FMJ (especially in a 9mm) for any tactical superiority over a modern hollow point. That's not my opinion or even debatable. Any research will show this and has been discussed at length. Ironic, isn't it, that exposed lead and hollow point bullets are banned from combat because they are more likely to cause horrible wounds and death?? Isn't that what you want as a civilian???? The best and most lethal bullet to end a confrontation???
Since there isnt any artificial political restrictions hindering police, SWAT or any tactcal team, they never choose to use a fmj and always use the best hollow points because they want to end the threat as quickly as possible.

Not only doesnt any law enforcement use the FMJ but all wildlife fish and game outlaw the use of FMJ to hunt with because of the danger and ineffectiveness compared to any hollow point design.


Last but not least, ....lets not discount the ammo manufactures design and intended purpose directly from the manufacture itself.
On all FMJ boxes or ammo manufactures web site, it list the FMJ for "range use" or "practice only" printed on the box or at the web site. Some even go the extra distance to warn you that this not designed for "personal protection".

(Disclaimer:
Sure, if you are in a life and death situation and all you have is FMJ, then you are going to use them but only in that rare and unique situation because that's your ONLY choice.)

You can drive with your feet but that doesn't mean its a good idea. (and yet some knuckle heads do this too. Perhaps to go against conventional knowledge and common sense).

Here is one of many many videos why NOT to use FMJ.
http://youtu.be/N8hbkXPdlks

To recomend using FMJ over a modern hollow point for self defense is irresponsible when you have the option for a much better bullet.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top