BLACKHAWKNJ
Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2006
- Messages
- 6,204
- Reaction score
- 6,646
I have had my 4" M-57 for years. The 41 Magnum was sort of a revolver version of the 10MM Auto, it was meant to fill that elusive "caliber gap'-whatever THAT is. Because of
either marketing failures or people simply misunderstanding the niche the round was supposed to fill, it never achieved wide acceptance. Jeff Cooper told the story of one PD that adopted it but used full power ammunition that made training difficult, he also mentioned that some smaller police recruits found the N-Frame too large to grip properly. Bill Jordan had huge hands but he persuaded S&W to develop what became the M-19. And like him, I do not find S&w target grips comfortable-I have Herrett's on mine. Since recoil is a very subjective thing saying it has "15-20% less" recoil than the 44 Magnum really doesn't mean much.
I have found it a very easy cartridge to reload, I confess I have gotten away from reloading
but I recall lead bullets were somewhat scarce, when I found them I bought as many boxes as I could. "Someday" I will get a Marlin 1894 in 41 Magnum.
either marketing failures or people simply misunderstanding the niche the round was supposed to fill, it never achieved wide acceptance. Jeff Cooper told the story of one PD that adopted it but used full power ammunition that made training difficult, he also mentioned that some smaller police recruits found the N-Frame too large to grip properly. Bill Jordan had huge hands but he persuaded S&W to develop what became the M-19. And like him, I do not find S&w target grips comfortable-I have Herrett's on mine. Since recoil is a very subjective thing saying it has "15-20% less" recoil than the 44 Magnum really doesn't mean much.
I have found it a very easy cartridge to reload, I confess I have gotten away from reloading
but I recall lead bullets were somewhat scarce, when I found them I bought as many boxes as I could. "Someday" I will get a Marlin 1894 in 41 Magnum.