41 to 44 kick
- Thread starter butch32
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Beans
Member
Based upon the comparison of my 4 inch 657 and my 4 inch 629 I would guessamate about 10% recoil difference when using full house loads.
This is comparing the 250 Gr factory 41 mag hunting loads and the 240 gr 44 mag hunting loads
This is comparing the 250 Gr factory 41 mag hunting loads and the 240 gr 44 mag hunting loads
john traveler
Member
By most estimates, the .41 Magnum has about 80% of the muzzle energy of the .44 Magnum. This is comparing the .41 210 jacketed bullet full-velocity loads to the .44 240 jacketed bullet full-velocity loads, of course.
Recoil sensation will be close to that.
Recoil sensation will be close to that.
The .41mag has almost as much recoil as the .44mag but that "almost" makes a big difference to the perceived recoil for many people.
The .41mag is a powerful revolver cartridge. It can take just about any game that the .44 can take. At the same time it's more civilized and has less brutal recoil than the more popular .44mag. Popularity doesn't necessarily make it better.
The .41mag is a powerful revolver cartridge. It can take just about any game that the .44 can take. At the same time it's more civilized and has less brutal recoil than the more popular .44mag. Popularity doesn't necessarily make it better.
Dan Christopher
Member
Ditto all the above. Quite honestly, both require about the same amount of practice to be proficient with.
mkk41
US Veteran
If ya look at the ballistic tables from the big 3 , there are some .41 mag loads that are more powerful than most .44 factory loads.
It all boils down to physics. Jumpstarting a 210gr bullet to 13400fps should has less recoil than launching a 240gr slug to the same speed.
Now when it comes to handloads , I've had guys that regularly shoot Mod.29s with factory ammo hand my Mod.57 back after trying a cylinderful of my handloads.
It all boils down to physics. Jumpstarting a 210gr bullet to 13400fps should has less recoil than launching a 240gr slug to the same speed.
Now when it comes to handloads , I've had guys that regularly shoot Mod.29s with factory ammo hand my Mod.57 back after trying a cylinderful of my handloads.
I see little difference in the full throttle loads. Where the .41 always shined for me was the "Special" level handloads. Very soft recoiling and still putting out a lot more energy than the .38/9mm etc. IMO the 210 slug at 850-950 fps is a great cartridge for SD or even deer size game if the range isn't too great. This was my favorite gun/load for bowling pins as well. Very, very accurate from a 6" 57.
Sir, it's been several years since I shot both side-by-side, but I don't recall any appreciable difference between them with full-power loads in 6-inch N-frames.
[shrug]
Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.
Ron H.
[shrug]
Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.
Ron H.
Butch, just MHO, but I believe in an 8-inch gun you will not notice a lot of difference. I am something of a recoil sissy and and am not bothered at all by an 8-inch 44 Magnum. I do notice a difference in a 4-inch gun, and the 41 is decidedly easier on the shooter in that length - this shooter, anyway.
Just got issues with the bones in my wrist and right now the 41 mag with 8 3/8 with stout factory loads is all I want. I always wanted a 44 with the 8 3/8 barrel and if there is no noticable difference I know where I can get a deal on a new in the box. Butch.
Dan Christopher
Member
Hey, Butch
I don't know if you reload or not, but even if you don't...there's plenty of 44 Magnum ammo that is actually quite mild to shoot. Plus you have the option of using 44 Specials in the 44 Magnum revolver.
MakeMyNight
Member
I have sister 657 and 629 six inch guns, and both seem to kick about the same when using big bullet hot loadings.
During My deer hunting days, I carried My Redhawk 7-1/2" and left My S&W's at home for range work.
During My deer hunting days, I carried My Redhawk 7-1/2" and left My S&W's at home for range work.
Joni_Lynn
US Veteran
I find the 41 and 44 to be in the same ballpark as far as recoil.
If you'd like a 41 or 44 that has a bit less recoil, find one of the power port versions. My 629-4 PP is the most recoil friendly 44 I currently own. On a limited basis the 657 and 625 were both made in power port versions.
If you'd like a 41 or 44 that has a bit less recoil, find one of the power port versions. My 629-4 PP is the most recoil friendly 44 I currently own. On a limited basis the 657 and 625 were both made in power port versions.
Dan Christopher
Member
I didn't know that about the 625. My question is: why in the world would a 625 need to be ported????
Joni_Lynn
US Veteran
I'd just be guessing but I'd bet they would make just about anything if they thought enough people would buy them. (within reason of course)
OIF1 45man
Member
I have had both but now just have the 657 7.5 inch. IMHO the 41 is more accurate and has about 20% less recoil when using factory-like ammunition. That said you can load them anywhere from mild to unpleasant.
Brave Rifles
Brave Rifles
Sportsterguy
Member
+1. Love my .41's! They never received the respect they deserve. My 6" has 37 deer to it's name. Most with the old Remington 210 gr. JSP. Deer didn't know the difference between that and a 240 gr. .429" .44 mag.
Similar threads
