I tell my wife I love her. I think she believes me.
But I've found a new man-crush -- my 500 mag. Damn, that's a sweet gun!
A disclaimer -- the 500 ammo I was shooting is pretty mild compared to other loads, so the comparison might not be fair.
My son and I went shooting today and, with some trepidation, I loaded the beast up and shot. Hmm, not too bad, so two more and then I let the R.O. shoot the remaining two. He shook my hand and other people at the range came to see what was causing the explosions near them. My son then shot three and I finished the last two. Ten rounds all total at $3.00 a round. Worth it!
I'm 81, don't see as well as I used to, and my hands shake. When I shoot my 9 mm, I have to lean against something to help steady me. My 1911 is easier for me to control, more accurate for me. But this 500. I don't shake, probably because it weighs a ton, resulting in more accurate shots.
Now, to the comparison to my 29-2 "Dirty Harry" .44. Don't get me wrong, I love this gun too, and I won't tell it I'm seeing someone else. But when I shoot it, it leaves the grip-pattern imprinted in my hand the first shot. I don't like firing more than three rounds at a time because of the recoil. The recoil is sharper than with the 500, and it's definitely not pleasant to shoot. Except for the cost of ammo, I'd shoot the 500 over the .44 anytime. I just need to go out in the woods somewhere and shoot something more substantial than a paper target so I can see it blow up.
I plan to buy some more potent ammo and try that.
Stats:
Armscor 500 S&W, 300 grain JHP, allegedly 1195 FPS and 951 foot lbs.
vs.
PMC .44 Mag, 180 grain JHP, rated on the box 1750 FPS, 1225 ft. lbs.
But I've found a new man-crush -- my 500 mag. Damn, that's a sweet gun!
A disclaimer -- the 500 ammo I was shooting is pretty mild compared to other loads, so the comparison might not be fair.
My son and I went shooting today and, with some trepidation, I loaded the beast up and shot. Hmm, not too bad, so two more and then I let the R.O. shoot the remaining two. He shook my hand and other people at the range came to see what was causing the explosions near them. My son then shot three and I finished the last two. Ten rounds all total at $3.00 a round. Worth it!
I'm 81, don't see as well as I used to, and my hands shake. When I shoot my 9 mm, I have to lean against something to help steady me. My 1911 is easier for me to control, more accurate for me. But this 500. I don't shake, probably because it weighs a ton, resulting in more accurate shots.
Now, to the comparison to my 29-2 "Dirty Harry" .44. Don't get me wrong, I love this gun too, and I won't tell it I'm seeing someone else. But when I shoot it, it leaves the grip-pattern imprinted in my hand the first shot. I don't like firing more than three rounds at a time because of the recoil. The recoil is sharper than with the 500, and it's definitely not pleasant to shoot. Except for the cost of ammo, I'd shoot the 500 over the .44 anytime. I just need to go out in the woods somewhere and shoot something more substantial than a paper target so I can see it blow up.
I plan to buy some more potent ammo and try that.
Stats:
Armscor 500 S&W, 300 grain JHP, allegedly 1195 FPS and 951 foot lbs.
vs.
PMC .44 Mag, 180 grain JHP, rated on the box 1750 FPS, 1225 ft. lbs.